Bump timeit to 0.3.2 #6349

tonyredondo · 2024-11-25T16:50:41Z

Summary of changes

This PR bumps timeit to the latest version.

datadog-ddstaging · 2024-11-25T17:12:03Z

Datadog Report

Branch report: tony/bump-timeit-to-0.2.1
Commit report: 82f85f1
Test service: dd-trace-dotnet

✅ 0 Failed, 450988 Passed, 2742 Skipped, 19h 22m 41.67s Total Time

andrewlock · 2024-11-25T17:50:26Z

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing the following branches/commits:

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program. And are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are shown in red. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.6.2) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6349) - mean (73ms)  : 70, 76
     .   : milestone, 73,
    master - mean (76ms)  : 71, 81
     .   : milestone, 76,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6349) - mean (1,018ms)  : 981, 1054
     .   : milestone, 1018,
    master - mean (1,064ms)  : 973, 1154
     .   : milestone, 1064,

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6349) - mean (114ms)  : 110, 119
     .   : milestone, 114,
    master - mean (119ms)  : 114, 124
     .   : milestone, 119,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6349) - mean (703ms)  : 688, 718
     .   : milestone, 703,
    master - mean (745ms)  : 678, 811
     .   : milestone, 745,

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6349) - mean (97ms)  : 92, 102
     .   : milestone, 97,
    master - mean (101ms)  : 96, 107
     .   : milestone, 101,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6349) - mean (650ms)  : 634, 667
     .   : milestone, 650,
    master - mean (678ms)  : 658, 698
     .   : milestone, 678,

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.6.2) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6349) - mean (190ms)  : 187, 193
     .   : milestone, 190,
    master - mean (192ms)  : 189, 195
     .   : milestone, 192,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6349) - mean (1,095ms)  : 1066, 1124
     .   : milestone, 1095,
    master - mean (1,095ms)  : 1072, 1119
     .   : milestone, 1095,

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6349) - mean (276ms)  : 272, 280
     .   : milestone, 276,
    master - mean (276ms)  : 272, 280
     .   : milestone, 276,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6349) - mean (873ms)  : 836, 910
     .   : milestone, 873,
    master - mean (868ms)  : 846, 891
     .   : milestone, 868,

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6349) - mean (266ms)  : 262, 270
     .   : milestone, 266,
    master - mean (266ms)  : 262, 269
     .   : milestone, 266,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6349) - mean (850ms)  : 815, 886
     .   : milestone, 850,
    master - mean (856ms)  : 826, 887
     .   : milestone, 856,

andrewlock · 2024-11-25T20:22:04Z

Throughput/Crank Report ⚡

Throughput results for AspNetCoreSimpleController comparing the following branches/commits:

Cases where throughput results for the PR are worse than latest master (5% drop or greater), results are shown in red.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see one of the many, many dashboards!

gantt
    title Throughput Linux x64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (6349) (11.156M)   : 0, 11155730
    master (11.198M)   : 0, 11198348
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (11.033M)   : 0, 11032866

    section Automatic
    This PR (6349) (7.351M)   : 0, 7351480
    master (7.205M)   : 0, 7205466
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (7.786M)   : 0, 7785853

    section Trace stats
    master (7.443M)   : 0, 7442635

    section Manual
    master (11.218M)   : 0, 11217680

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (6349) (6.742M)   : 0, 6741955
    master (6.727M)   : 0, 6726536

    section DD_TRACE_ENABLED=0
    master (10.410M)   : 0, 10409702

gantt
    title Throughput Linux arm64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (6349) (9.537M)   : 0, 9536549
    master (9.510M)   : 0, 9510466
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (9.495M)   : 0, 9494821

    section Automatic
    This PR (6349) (6.342M)   : 0, 6342249
    master (6.331M)   : 0, 6331398

    section Trace stats
    master (6.659M)   : 0, 6658730

    section Manual
    master (9.280M)   : 0, 9280107

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (6349) (5.976M)   : 0, 5976106
    master (5.691M)   : 0, 5690770

    section DD_TRACE_ENABLED=0
    master (8.840M)   : 0, 8840434

gantt
    title Throughput Windows x64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (6349) (9.804M)   : 0, 9803773
    master (10.163M)   : 0, 10163050
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (10.020M)   : 0, 10019592

    section Automatic
    This PR (6349) (6.025M)   : crit ,0, 6025042
    master (6.829M)   : 0, 6828973
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (7.255M)   : 0, 7255257

    section Trace stats
    master (7.555M)   : 0, 7554541

    section Manual
    master (10.735M)   : 0, 10735441

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (6349) (6.213M)   : crit ,0, 6212745
    master (6.575M)   : 0, 6575410

    section DD_TRACE_ENABLED=0
    master (10.155M)   : 0, 10155272

andrewlock · 2024-11-25T22:40:01Z

Benchmarks Report for tracer 🐌

Benchmarks for #6349 compared to master:

1 benchmarks are faster, with geometric mean 1.118
2 benchmarks are slower, with geometric mean 1.187
All benchmarks have the same allocations

The following thresholds were used for comparing the benchmark speeds:

Mann–Whitney U test with statistical test for significance of 5%
Only results indicating a difference greater than 10% and 0.3 ns are considered.

Allocation changes below 0.5% are ignored.

Benchmark details

Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Gen 1	Gen 2	Allocated
master	`StartStopWithChild`	net6.0	7.97μs	45.4ns	340ns	0.0193	0.0077	0	5.61 KB
master	`StartStopWithChild`	netcoreapp3.1	10.3μs	56.3ns	328ns	0.0198	0.0099	0	5.8 KB
master	`StartStopWithChild`	net472	16.3μs	45.3ns	175ns	1.04	0.293	0.0951	6.2 KB
#6349	`StartStopWithChild`	net6.0	8.17μs	45.7ns	303ns	0.012	0.00399	0	5.61 KB
#6349	`StartStopWithChild`	netcoreapp3.1	10μs	56ns	372ns	0.0191	0.00953	0	5.8 KB
#6349	`StartStopWithChild`	net472	16.4μs	40.6ns	157ns	1.04	0.318	0.0978	6.22 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net6.0	491μs	248ns	895ns	0	2.7 KB
master	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	netcoreapp3.1	657μs	465ns	1.8μs	0	2.7 KB
master	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net472	844μs	562ns	2.18μs	0.419	3.3 KB
#6349	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net6.0	497μs	677ns	2.62μs	0	2.7 KB
#6349	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	netcoreapp3.1	666μs	344ns	1.33μs	0	2.7 KB
#6349	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net472	846μs	257ns	997ns	0.422	3.3 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`SendRequest`	net6.0	151μs	981ns	9.71μs	0.149	14.47 KB
master	`SendRequest`	netcoreapp3.1	167μs	950ns	6.85μs	0.161	17.27 KB
master	`SendRequest`	net472	0.00119ns	0.000623ns	0.00241ns	0	0 b
#6349	`SendRequest`	net6.0	148μs	867ns	7.75μs	0.142	14.47 KB
#6349	`SendRequest`	netcoreapp3.1	171μs	1.07μs	10.7μs	0.159	17.27 KB
#6349	`SendRequest`	net472	0.0016ns	0.000824ns	0.00308ns	0	0 b

Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Gen 1	Gen 2	Allocated
master	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net6.0	555μs	1.69μs	6.32μs	0.548	0	0	41.62 KB
master	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	netcoreapp3.1	686μs	3.45μs	16.2μs	0.34	0	0	41.85 KB
master	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net472	854μs	3.84μs	14.4μs	8.33	2.5	0.417	53.25 KB
#6349	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net6.0	554μs	2.06μs	7.96μs	0.551	0	0	41.58 KB
#6349	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	netcoreapp3.1	683μs	3.65μs	20.3μs	0.347	0	0	41.85 KB
#6349	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net472	878μs	3.83μs	14.8μs	8.87	2.66	0.443	53.27 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.DbCommandBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Gen 1	Allocated
master	`ExecuteNonQuery`	net6.0	1.28μs	1.01ns	3.92ns	0.0147	0	1.02 KB
master	`ExecuteNonQuery`	netcoreapp3.1	1.74μs	2.21ns	8.55ns	0.0139	0	1.02 KB
master	`ExecuteNonQuery`	net472	2.13μs	1.25ns	4.86ns	0.156	0.00108	987 B
#6349	`ExecuteNonQuery`	net6.0	1.41μs	1.73ns	6.71ns	0.0141	0	1.02 KB
#6349	`ExecuteNonQuery`	netcoreapp3.1	1.8μs	1.43ns	5.55ns	0.0136	0	1.02 KB
#6349	`ExecuteNonQuery`	net472	2.1μs	2.99ns	11.2ns	0.156	0.00105	987 B

Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark - Faster 🎉 Same allocations ✔️

Faster 🎉 in #6349

Benchmark	base/diff	Base Median (ns)	Diff Median (ns)	Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch‑net6.0	1.118	1,344.46	1,202.74

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`CallElasticsearch`	net6.0	1.35μs	1.64ns	6.37ns	0.0135	976 B
master	`CallElasticsearch`	netcoreapp3.1	1.49μs	0.569ns	2.13ns	0.0133	976 B
master	`CallElasticsearch`	net472	2.56μs	2.42ns	9.38ns	0.158	995 B
master	`CallElasticsearchAsync`	net6.0	1.29μs	0.568ns	2.13ns	0.0129	952 B
master	`CallElasticsearchAsync`	netcoreapp3.1	1.68μs	1.97ns	7.65ns	0.0136	1.02 KB
master	`CallElasticsearchAsync`	net472	2.63μs	1.95ns	7.3ns	0.166	1.05 KB
#6349	`CallElasticsearch`	net6.0	1.2μs	1.91ns	7.39ns	0.0137	976 B
#6349	`CallElasticsearch`	netcoreapp3.1	1.61μs	1.64ns	5.91ns	0.0127	976 B
#6349	`CallElasticsearch`	net472	2.59μs	1.43ns	5.53ns	0.158	995 B
#6349	`CallElasticsearchAsync`	net6.0	1.32μs	0.705ns	2.73ns	0.0131	952 B
#6349	`CallElasticsearchAsync`	netcoreapp3.1	1.66μs	1.18ns	4.41ns	0.0133	1.02 KB
#6349	`CallElasticsearchAsync`	net472	2.83μs	0.521ns	1.88ns	0.166	1.05 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`ExecuteAsync`	net6.0	1.27μs	0.915ns	3.42ns	0.0132	952 B
master	`ExecuteAsync`	netcoreapp3.1	1.72μs	0.807ns	3.02ns	0.0123	952 B
master	`ExecuteAsync`	net472	1.8μs	0.423ns	1.64ns	0.145	915 B
#6349	`ExecuteAsync`	net6.0	1.29μs	0.768ns	2.88ns	0.0136	952 B
#6349	`ExecuteAsync`	netcoreapp3.1	1.55μs	1.08ns	4.18ns	0.0125	952 B
#6349	`ExecuteAsync`	net472	1.83μs	1.52ns	5.87ns	0.145	915 B

Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`SendAsync`	net6.0	4.44μs	1.38ns	5.16ns	0.0311	2.31 KB
master	`SendAsync`	netcoreapp3.1	5.35μs	1.65ns	6.4ns	0.0374	2.85 KB
master	`SendAsync`	net472	7.28μs	8.94ns	34.6ns	0.494	3.12 KB
#6349	`SendAsync`	net6.0	4.48μs	1.01ns	3.8ns	0.0324	2.31 KB
#6349	`SendAsync`	netcoreapp3.1	5.45μs	3.07ns	11.9ns	0.0385	2.85 KB
#6349	`SendAsync`	net472	7.12μs	2.01ns	7.79ns	0.495	3.12 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	1.61μs	0.652ns	2.44ns	0.0227	1.64 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	2.21μs	0.8ns	2.99ns	0.0222	1.64 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	net472	2.58μs	2.47ns	9.22ns	0.249	1.57 KB
#6349	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	1.53μs	1.31ns	4.91ns	0.0232	1.64 KB
#6349	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	2.23μs	1.31ns	4.91ns	0.0225	1.64 KB
#6349	`EnrichedLog`	net472	2.74μs	1.75ns	6.77ns	0.249	1.57 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Gen 1	Allocated
master	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	121μs	114ns	428ns	0.0608	0	4.28 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	124μs	160ns	618ns	0	0	4.28 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	net472	151μs	99.8ns	373ns	0.681	0.227	4.46 KB
#6349	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	120μs	174ns	675ns	0	0	4.28 KB
#6349	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	124μs	114ns	427ns	0	0	4.28 KB
#6349	`EnrichedLog`	net472	152μs	147ns	570ns	0.684	0.228	4.46 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.NLogBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	3.08μs	1.29ns	5.01ns	0.0306	2.2 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	4.25μs	1.32ns	5.13ns	0.0302	2.2 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	net472	4.79μs	2.13ns	8.25ns	0.321	2.02 KB
#6349	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	2.96μs	2.32ns	8.99ns	0.031	2.2 KB
#6349	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	4.15μs	1.47ns	5.5ns	0.0292	2.2 KB
#6349	`EnrichedLog`	net472	4.79μs	1.05ns	3.93ns	0.321	2.02 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`SendReceive`	net6.0	1.34μs	0.474ns	1.77ns	0.0158	1.14 KB
master	`SendReceive`	netcoreapp3.1	1.74μs	0.59ns	2.21ns	0.0157	1.14 KB
master	`SendReceive`	net472	2.12μs	0.668ns	2.5ns	0.183	1.16 KB
#6349	`SendReceive`	net6.0	1.29μs	0.486ns	1.88ns	0.0161	1.14 KB
#6349	`SendReceive`	netcoreapp3.1	1.79μs	0.967ns	3.62ns	0.0152	1.14 KB
#6349	`SendReceive`	net472	2.06μs	1.04ns	4.01ns	0.183	1.16 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	2.67μs	1.32ns	5.12ns	0.0228	1.6 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	3.85μs	1.17ns	4.37ns	0.0211	1.65 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	net472	4.48μs	2.37ns	8.88ns	0.322	2.04 KB
#6349	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	2.81μs	1.27ns	4.92ns	0.0224	1.6 KB
#6349	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	3.83μs	4.31ns	16.7ns	0.021	1.65 KB
#6349	`EnrichedLog`	net472	4.45μs	1.76ns	6.58ns	0.322	2.04 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark - Slower ⚠️ Same allocations ✔️

Slower ⚠️ in #6349

Benchmark	diff/base	Base Median (ns)	Diff Median (ns)	Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope‑net6.0	1.249	477.75	596.84
Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan‑net6.0	1.127	404.06	455.32

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`StartFinishSpan`	net6.0	403ns	0.694ns	2.69ns	0.00817	576 B
master	`StartFinishSpan`	netcoreapp3.1	578ns	1.3ns	5.05ns	0.00778	576 B
master	`StartFinishSpan`	net472	721ns	1.91ns	7.41ns	0.0917	578 B
master	`StartFinishScope`	net6.0	478ns	0.652ns	2.52ns	0.00978	696 B
master	`StartFinishScope`	netcoreapp3.1	676ns	3.63ns	18.5ns	0.00961	696 B
master	`StartFinishScope`	net472	850ns	1.58ns	6.1ns	0.104	658 B
#6349	`StartFinishSpan`	net6.0	455ns	0.606ns	2.35ns	0.00807	576 B
#6349	`StartFinishSpan`	netcoreapp3.1	563ns	0.494ns	1.91ns	0.00784	576 B
#6349	`StartFinishSpan`	net472	653ns	1.5ns	5.8ns	0.0916	578 B
#6349	`StartFinishScope`	net6.0	596ns	0.909ns	3.52ns	0.00976	696 B
#6349	`StartFinishScope`	netcoreapp3.1	708ns	2.15ns	8.05ns	0.00936	696 B
#6349	`StartFinishScope`	net472	859ns	1.79ns	6.92ns	0.104	658 B

Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`RunOnMethodBegin`	net6.0	651ns	1.15ns	4.47ns	0.00982	696 B
master	`RunOnMethodBegin`	netcoreapp3.1	986ns	2.14ns	8.27ns	0.00893	696 B
master	`RunOnMethodBegin`	net472	1.06μs	2.33ns	9.03ns	0.104	658 B
#6349	`RunOnMethodBegin`	net6.0	678ns	0.98ns	3.8ns	0.00975	696 B
#6349	`RunOnMethodBegin`	netcoreapp3.1	952ns	1.96ns	7.6ns	0.00939	696 B
#6349	`RunOnMethodBegin`	net472	1.07μs	2.21ns	8.58ns	0.104	658 B

daniel-romano-DD

👍

## Summary of changes This PR bumps timeit to the latest version.

Bump timeit to 0.2.1

ee71824

github-actions bot added the area:builds project files, build scripts, pipelines, versioning, releases, packages label Nov 25, 2024

increase count

81b4406

changes

4a11d92

tonyredondo marked this pull request as ready for review November 25, 2024 22:00

tonyredondo requested a review from a team as a code owner November 25, 2024 22:00

tonyredondo added 5 commits November 26, 2024 15:04

Update run.cmd

98c7cca

Update run.cmd

b8bebdd

changes

2a282ee

change values

95b2c19

values change

64ff48b

tonyredondo changed the title ~~Bump timeit to 0.2.1~~ Bump timeit to 0.3.0 Nov 26, 2024

bump version

998d7b4

tonyredondo changed the title ~~Bump timeit to 0.3.0~~ Bump timeit to 0.3.1 Nov 26, 2024

tonyredondo added 2 commits November 26, 2024 18:30

changes

4476aeb

bump

82f85f1

tonyredondo changed the title ~~Bump timeit to 0.3.1~~ Bump timeit to 0.3.2 Nov 26, 2024

daniel-romano-DD approved these changes Nov 27, 2024

View reviewed changes

tonyredondo merged commit 9dc0d08 into master Nov 27, 2024
77 checks passed

tonyredondo deleted the tony/bump-timeit-to-0.2.1 branch November 27, 2024 09:50

github-actions bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone Nov 27, 2024

veerbia pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2024

Bump timeit to 0.3.2 (#6349)

30b4062

## Summary of changes This PR bumps timeit to the latest version.

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Bump timeit to 0.3.2 #6349

Bump timeit to 0.3.2 #6349

tonyredondo commented Nov 25, 2024 •

edited

Loading

datadog-ddstaging bot commented Nov 25, 2024 •

edited

Loading

andrewlock commented Nov 25, 2024 •

edited

Loading

andrewlock commented Nov 25, 2024 •

edited

Loading

andrewlock commented Nov 25, 2024 •

edited

Loading

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Faster 🎉 in #6349

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Slower ⚠️ in #6349

Raw results

Raw results

daniel-romano-DD left a comment

Bump timeit to 0.3.2 #6349

Bump timeit to 0.3.2 #6349

Conversation

tonyredondo commented Nov 25, 2024 • edited Loading

Summary of changes

datadog-ddstaging bot commented Nov 25, 2024 • edited Loading

Datadog Report

andrewlock commented Nov 25, 2024 • edited Loading

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

andrewlock commented Nov 25, 2024 • edited Loading

Throughput/Crank Report ⚡

andrewlock commented Nov 25, 2024 • edited Loading

Benchmarks Report for tracer 🐌

Benchmark details

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Faster 🎉 in #6349

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Slower ⚠️ in #6349

Raw results

Raw results

daniel-romano-DD left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

tonyredondo commented Nov 25, 2024 •

edited

Loading

datadog-ddstaging bot commented Nov 25, 2024 •

edited

Loading

andrewlock commented Nov 25, 2024 •

edited

Loading

andrewlock commented Nov 25, 2024 •

edited

Loading

andrewlock commented Nov 25, 2024 •

edited

Loading