Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix subtle WCF bug #6131

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 9, 2024
Merged

Fix subtle WCF bug #6131

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 9, 2024

Conversation

andrewlock
Copy link
Member

Summary of changes

Fix the precedence bug

Reason for change

The order of precedence is wrong with the use of ?? false, so the second condition is never checked

image

Implementation details

Make the null check explicit

Test coverage

Meh, this seems like a tricky case to check so YOLO?

@andrewlock andrewlock added type:bug area:automatic-instrumentation Automatic instrumentation managed C# code (Datadog.Trace.ClrProfiler.Managed) area:integrations labels Oct 8, 2024
@andrewlock andrewlock requested review from a team as code owners October 8, 2024 18:40
@datadog-ddstaging
Copy link

datadog-ddstaging bot commented Oct 8, 2024

Datadog Report

Branch report: andrew/fix-wcf-bug
Commit report: 5bb2da3
Test service: dd-trace-dotnet

✅ 0 Failed, 364916 Passed, 2084 Skipped, 15h 5m 24.83s Total Time

@andrewlock
Copy link
Member Author

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing the following branches/commits:

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program. And are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are shown in red. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.6.2) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6131) - mean (71ms)  : 67, 74
     .   : milestone, 71,
    master - mean (70ms)  : 68, 72
     .   : milestone, 70,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6131) - mean (1,108ms)  : 1083, 1133
     .   : milestone, 1108,
    master - mean (1,109ms)  : 1088, 1130
     .   : milestone, 1109,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6131) - mean (110ms)  : 106, 113
     .   : milestone, 110,
    master - mean (110ms)  : 108, 113
     .   : milestone, 110,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6131) - mean (776ms)  : 759, 792
     .   : milestone, 776,
    master - mean (781ms)  : 765, 796
     .   : milestone, 781,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6131) - mean (93ms)  : 91, 95
     .   : milestone, 93,
    master - mean (93ms)  : 91, 95
     .   : milestone, 93,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6131) - mean (731ms)  : 711, 752
     .   : milestone, 731,
    master - mean (739ms)  : 718, 761
     .   : milestone, 739,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.6.2) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6131) - mean (194ms)  : 186, 201
     .   : milestone, 194,
    master - mean (191ms)  : 187, 195
     .   : milestone, 191,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6131) - mean (1,203ms)  : 1161, 1244
     .   : milestone, 1203,
    master - mean (1,197ms)  : 1171, 1222
     .   : milestone, 1197,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6131) - mean (276ms)  : 272, 280
     .   : milestone, 276,
    master - mean (277ms)  : 271, 282
     .   : milestone, 277,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6131) - mean (939ms)  : 923, 955
     .   : milestone, 939,
    master - mean (942ms)  : 924, 960
     .   : milestone, 942,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6131) - mean (265ms)  : 260, 271
     .   : milestone, 265,
    master - mean (268ms)  : 262, 273
     .   : milestone, 268,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6131) - mean (930ms)  : 909, 951
     .   : milestone, 930,
    master - mean (937ms)  : 916, 958
     .   : milestone, 937,

Loading

Copy link
Contributor

@bouwkast bouwkast left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@andrewlock
Copy link
Member Author

Benchmarks Report for tracer 🐌

Benchmarks for #6131 compared to master:

  • 2 benchmarks are faster, with geometric mean 1.145
  • 2 benchmarks are slower, with geometric mean 1.153
  • 1 benchmarks have fewer allocations

The following thresholds were used for comparing the benchmark speeds:

  • Mann–Whitney U test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 10% and 0.3 ns are considered.

Allocation changes below 0.5% are ignored.

Benchmark details

Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master StartStopWithChild net6.0 7.83μs 43.8ns 270ns 0.0149 0.00744 0 5.43 KB
master StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1 9.81μs 54.2ns 347ns 0.0189 0.00945 0 5.61 KB
master StartStopWithChild net472 16.8μs 75ns 291ns 1.02 0.311 0.0864 6.06 KB
#6131 StartStopWithChild net6.0 7.96μs 45ns 298ns 0.0152 0.00759 0 5.43 KB
#6131 StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1 9.83μs 53.7ns 318ns 0.0195 0.00975 0 5.62 KB
#6131 StartStopWithChild net472 16.3μs 47.7ns 185ns 1.03 0.293 0.0978 6.07 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 499μs 216ns 778ns 0 0 0 2.7 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 648μs 730ns 2.83μs 0 0 0 2.7 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 826μs 214ns 828ns 0.414 0 0 3.3 KB
#6131 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 498μs 438ns 1.7μs 0 0 0 2.7 KB
#6131 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 644μs 2.76μs 13.5μs 0 0 0 2.7 KB
#6131 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 842μs 509ns 1.9μs 0.422 0 0 3.3 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendRequest net6.0 192μs 1.07μs 6.66μs 0.147 0 0 18.45 KB
master SendRequest netcoreapp3.1 218μs 1.18μs 8.24μs 0.217 0 0 20.61 KB
master SendRequest net472 0.00176ns 0.000702ns 0.00272ns 0 0 0 0 b
#6131 SendRequest net6.0 210μs 1.33μs 13.2μs 0.182 0 0 18.45 KB
#6131 SendRequest netcoreapp3.1 228μs 1.4μs 13.5μs 0.206 0 0 20.61 KB
#6131 SendRequest net472 0.0022ns 0.000955ns 0.0037ns 0 0 0 0 b
Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Fewer allocations 🎉

Fewer allocations 🎉 in #6131

Benchmark Base Allocated Diff Allocated Change Change %
Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces‑net6.0 41.75 KB 41.43 KB -323 B -0.77%

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 576μs 1.64μs 6.12μs 0.553 0 0 41.75 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 699μs 3.53μs 16.6μs 0.336 0 0 41.73 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 852μs 3.34μs 12.9μs 8.45 2.53 0.422 53.28 KB
#6131 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 559μs 2.58μs 9.65μs 0.563 0 0 41.43 KB
#6131 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 752μs 4.06μs 27.8μs 0.393 0 0 41.57 KB
#6131 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 852μs 3.26μs 12.6μs 8.39 2.52 0.419 53.29 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.DbCommandBenchmark - Faster 🎉 Same allocations ✔️

Faster 🎉 in #6131

Benchmark base/diff Base Median (ns) Diff Median (ns) Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.DbCommandBenchmark.ExecuteNonQuery‑net6.0 1.134 1,361.15 1,200.62

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master ExecuteNonQuery net6.0 1.36μs 1.25ns 4.84ns 0.014 0 0 1.02 KB
master ExecuteNonQuery netcoreapp3.1 1.75μs 1.7ns 6.58ns 0.0139 0 0 1.02 KB
master ExecuteNonQuery net472 2.15μs 1.75ns 6.57ns 0.157 0 0 987 B
#6131 ExecuteNonQuery net6.0 1.2μs 1.25ns 4.85ns 0.0144 0 0 1.02 KB
#6131 ExecuteNonQuery netcoreapp3.1 1.72μs 1.53ns 5.71ns 0.0139 0 0 1.02 KB
#6131 ExecuteNonQuery net472 2.19μs 3.64ns 14.1ns 0.156 0 0 987 B
Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master CallElasticsearch net6.0 1.17μs 0.644ns 2.41ns 0.0135 0 0 976 B
master CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1 1.49μs 1.09ns 4.22ns 0.0129 0 0 976 B
master CallElasticsearch net472 2.5μs 1.29ns 5ns 0.158 0 0 995 B
master CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0 1.28μs 0.913ns 3.42ns 0.0134 0 0 952 B
master CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.6μs 0.532ns 1.99ns 0.0136 0 0 1.02 KB
master CallElasticsearchAsync net472 2.57μs 1.07ns 4.01ns 0.167 0 0 1.05 KB
#6131 CallElasticsearch net6.0 1.23μs 1.14ns 4.43ns 0.0133 0 0 976 B
#6131 CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1 1.58μs 1.06ns 4.11ns 0.0135 0 0 976 B
#6131 CallElasticsearch net472 2.58μs 0.851ns 3.3ns 0.157 0 0 995 B
#6131 CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0 1.18μs 0.75ns 2.9ns 0.0135 0 0 952 B
#6131 CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.57μs 0.598ns 2.24ns 0.0134 0 0 1.02 KB
#6131 CallElasticsearchAsync net472 2.55μs 2.08ns 8.06ns 0.167 0 0 1.05 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master ExecuteAsync net6.0 1.25μs 2.17ns 8.41ns 0.0131 0 0 952 B
master ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.61μs 1.36ns 5.07ns 0.0129 0 0 952 B
master ExecuteAsync net472 1.9μs 0.723ns 2.8ns 0.144 0 0 915 B
#6131 ExecuteAsync net6.0 1.2μs 0.281ns 1.01ns 0.0132 0 0 952 B
#6131 ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.55μs 0.642ns 2.4ns 0.0132 0 0 952 B
#6131 ExecuteAsync net472 1.85μs 2.23ns 8.62ns 0.145 0 0 915 B
Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendAsync net6.0 4.11μs 2.8ns 10.5ns 0.0308 0 0 2.22 KB
master SendAsync netcoreapp3.1 5.16μs 3.69ns 14.3ns 0.0361 0 0 2.76 KB
master SendAsync net472 7.75μs 5.08ns 19ns 0.498 0 0 3.15 KB
#6131 SendAsync net6.0 4.28μs 1.73ns 6.71ns 0.03 0 0 2.22 KB
#6131 SendAsync netcoreapp3.1 5.1μs 2.29ns 8.87ns 0.0356 0 0 2.76 KB
#6131 SendAsync net472 7.8μs 1.65ns 6.41ns 0.497 0 0 3.15 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 1.44μs 0.626ns 2.34ns 0.023 0 0 1.64 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 2.22μs 1.67ns 6.24ns 0.0223 0 0 1.64 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 2.54μs 1.09ns 4.07ns 0.249 0 0 1.57 KB
#6131 EnrichedLog net6.0 1.46μs 0.647ns 2.51ns 0.0233 0 0 1.64 KB
#6131 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 2.2μs 1.77ns 6.63ns 0.0218 0 0 1.64 KB
#6131 EnrichedLog net472 2.51μs 0.8ns 3.1ns 0.249 0 0 1.57 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 114μs 128ns 495ns 0.0567 0 0 4.28 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 117μs 166ns 644ns 0.0588 0 0 4.28 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 146μs 134ns 519ns 0.654 0.218 0 4.46 KB
#6131 EnrichedLog net6.0 115μs 121ns 467ns 0.0572 0 0 4.28 KB
#6131 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 119μs 266ns 1.03μs 0 0 0 4.28 KB
#6131 EnrichedLog net472 147μs 128ns 494ns 0.661 0.22 0 4.46 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.NLogBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 3.06μs 1.91ns 7.39ns 0.0305 0 0 2.2 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 4.3μs 1.99ns 7.69ns 0.0302 0 0 2.2 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 4.85μs 2ns 7.49ns 0.32 0 0 2.02 KB
#6131 EnrichedLog net6.0 3.03μs 2.68ns 10ns 0.0303 0 0 2.2 KB
#6131 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 4.08μs 9.8ns 37.9ns 0.0284 0 0 2.2 KB
#6131 EnrichedLog net472 4.98μs 0.899ns 3.48ns 0.32 0 0 2.02 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendReceive net6.0 1.35μs 0.772ns 2.89ns 0.0161 0 0 1.14 KB
master SendReceive netcoreapp3.1 1.83μs 0.869ns 3.37ns 0.0155 0 0 1.14 KB
master SendReceive net472 2.14μs 1.73ns 6.7ns 0.183 0.00108 0 1.16 KB
#6131 SendReceive net6.0 1.39μs 1.54ns 5.96ns 0.0157 0 0 1.14 KB
#6131 SendReceive netcoreapp3.1 1.79μs 2.08ns 8.06ns 0.0154 0 0 1.14 KB
#6131 SendReceive net472 2.1μs 1.68ns 6.52ns 0.183 0 0 1.16 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 2.67μs 1.16ns 4.48ns 0.0214 0 0 1.6 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 3.81μs 1.71ns 6.61ns 0.0211 0 0 1.65 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 4.46μs 2.37ns 8.87ns 0.322 0 0 2.04 KB
#6131 EnrichedLog net6.0 2.69μs 0.709ns 2.74ns 0.0215 0 0 1.6 KB
#6131 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 4.07μs 1.69ns 6.54ns 0.0203 0 0 1.65 KB
#6131 EnrichedLog net472 4.46μs 3.68ns 14.3ns 0.322 0 0 2.04 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark - Slower ⚠️ Same allocations ✔️

Slower ⚠️ in #6131

Benchmark diff/base Base Median (ns) Diff Median (ns) Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope‑net6.0 1.195 485.03 579.76

Faster 🎉 in #6131

Benchmark base/diff Base Median (ns) Diff Median (ns) Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan‑netcoreapp3.1 1.157 647.65 559.77

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master StartFinishSpan net6.0 413ns 0.329ns 1.27ns 0.00812 0 0 576 B
master StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1 649ns 1.79ns 6.92ns 0.0077 0 0 576 B
master StartFinishSpan net472 722ns 0.204ns 0.764ns 0.0915 0 0 578 B
master StartFinishScope net6.0 485ns 0.356ns 1.38ns 0.00974 0 0 696 B
master StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1 733ns 1.47ns 5.67ns 0.00939 0 0 696 B
master StartFinishScope net472 844ns 0.555ns 2ns 0.104 0 0 658 B
#6131 StartFinishSpan net6.0 401ns 0.248ns 0.961ns 0.00803 0 0 576 B
#6131 StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1 560ns 0.247ns 0.89ns 0.00791 0 0 576 B
#6131 StartFinishSpan net472 707ns 0.256ns 0.959ns 0.0915 0 0 578 B
#6131 StartFinishScope net6.0 579ns 0.477ns 1.85ns 0.00988 0 0 696 B
#6131 StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1 769ns 0.731ns 2.83ns 0.00941 0 0 696 B
#6131 StartFinishScope net472 851ns 0.696ns 2.6ns 0.104 0 0 658 B
Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark - Slower ⚠️ Same allocations ✔️

Slower ⚠️ in #6131

Benchmark diff/base Base Median (ns) Diff Median (ns) Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin‑net6.0 1.113 591.09 657.75

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master RunOnMethodBegin net6.0 591ns 0.29ns 1.12ns 0.00966 0 0 696 B
master RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1 903ns 0.496ns 1.92ns 0.00919 0 0 696 B
master RunOnMethodBegin net472 1.07μs 0.313ns 1.13ns 0.105 0 0 658 B
#6131 RunOnMethodBegin net6.0 658ns 0.428ns 1.66ns 0.00958 0 0 696 B
#6131 RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1 1μs 0.381ns 1.47ns 0.00902 0 0 696 B
#6131 RunOnMethodBegin net472 1.13μs 0.495ns 1.92ns 0.104 0 0 658 B

@andrewlock
Copy link
Member Author

Throughput/Crank Report ⚡

Throughput results for AspNetCoreSimpleController comparing the following branches/commits:

Cases where throughput results for the PR are worse than latest master (5% drop or greater), results are shown in red.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see one of the many, many dashboards!

gantt
    title Throughput Linux x64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (6131) (11.147M)   : 0, 11147482
    master (10.947M)   : 0, 10947067
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (11.081M)   : 0, 11080577

    section Automatic
    This PR (6131) (7.336M)   : 0, 7336378
    master (7.357M)   : 0, 7357178
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (7.732M)   : 0, 7732233

    section Trace stats
    master (7.658M)   : 0, 7658023

    section Manual
    master (11.170M)   : 0, 11169713

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (6131) (6.818M)   : 0, 6818467
    master (6.794M)   : 0, 6793735

    section DD_TRACE_ENABLED=0
    master (10.165M)   : 0, 10164915

Loading
gantt
    title Throughput Linux arm64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (6131) (9.489M)   : 0, 9488617
    master (9.407M)   : 0, 9406571
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (9.798M)   : 0, 9798067

    section Automatic
    This PR (6131) (6.555M)   : 0, 6554553
    master (6.543M)   : 0, 6542618

    section Trace stats
    master (6.888M)   : 0, 6887750

    section Manual
    master (9.380M)   : 0, 9379533

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (6131) (6.111M)   : 0, 6110814
    master (6.148M)   : 0, 6147954

    section DD_TRACE_ENABLED=0
    master (8.559M)   : 0, 8559117

Loading
gantt
    title Throughput Windows x64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (6131) (10.417M)   : 0, 10416739
    master (9.869M)   : 0, 9868639
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (10.067M)   : 0, 10067315

    section Automatic
    This PR (6131) (6.858M)   : 0, 6858137
    master (6.673M)   : 0, 6672534
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (7.552M)   : 0, 7552193

    section Trace stats
    master (7.379M)   : 0, 7378820

    section Manual
    master (10.188M)   : 0, 10188482

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (6131) (6.439M)   : 0, 6439046
    master (6.068M)   : 0, 6067649

    section DD_TRACE_ENABLED=0
    master (9.316M)   : 0, 9315564

Loading

@andrewlock andrewlock merged commit 1900fea into master Oct 9, 2024
74 of 75 checks passed
@andrewlock andrewlock deleted the andrew/fix-wcf-bug branch October 9, 2024 16:34
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone Oct 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:automatic-instrumentation Automatic instrumentation managed C# code (Datadog.Trace.ClrProfiler.Managed) area:integrations type:bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants