Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Try working around missing Docker Compose v1 in hosted runners #5386

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 3, 2024

Conversation

andrewlock
Copy link
Member

@andrewlock andrewlock commented Apr 3, 2024

Summary of changes

Run installer tests on a separate "smoke test" pool

Reason for change

Microsoft, have decided to break 30k pipelines by removing docker compose v1 from their hosted pipelines, installing v2 only instead: actions/runner-images#9557

What's more, their own Azure Devops DockerCompose@0 task doesn't even support v2: microsoft/azure-pipelines-tasks#19711

Implementation details

As a workaround, set up a separate Azure VMSS and use that for the smoke tests instead of the hosted runners.

Alternatives include:

  • Switching everything to use v2. This would also require dropping usage of the built-in task DockerCompose@0. Also, Microsoft don't provide arm64 hosted runners, so we have to self host, and those images are using v2, so we'd have to duplicate a bunch of tasks and/or update the runners etc.
  • Install Docker compose v1 on the hosted runners, as described here. I tried that, and it didn't work, primarily because we don't just use the DockerCompose@v0 task.
  • Switch to managing this with test containers, so there's only one abstraction to handle. I think we should look into this in the future, if nothing else it would reduce the amount of YAML we have, aiding transitions to other CI systems if necessary

Test coverage

This is the test. I'll also do a "run all installer tests" run to be sure.

Other details

:azure-chaos:

@andrewlock andrewlock added the area:builds project files, build scripts, pipelines, versioning, releases, packages label Apr 3, 2024
@datadog-ddstaging
Copy link

datadog-ddstaging bot commented Apr 3, 2024

Datadog Report

Branch report: andrew/ci/fix-docker-compose
Commit report: 7f0cafb
Test service: dd-trace-dotnet

✅ 0 Failed, 319935 Passed, 1541 Skipped, 42m 29.41s Wall Time
❄️ 1 New Flaky

New Flaky Tests (1)

  • ObfuscateWithDefaultPattern - Datadog.Trace.Tests.Util.Http.EvidenceRedactorTests - Last Failure

    Expand for error
     Expected string to be "key1=val1&<redacted>&key2=val2" with a length of 30, but "" has a length of 0, differs near "" (index 0).
    

@andrewlock
Copy link
Member Author

andrewlock commented Apr 3, 2024

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing the following branches/commits:

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program. And are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are shown in red. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.6.2) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (5386) - mean (74ms)  : 65, 84
     .   : milestone, 74,
    master - mean (73ms)  : 65, 80
     .   : milestone, 73,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (5386) - mean (1,010ms)  : 989, 1031
     .   : milestone, 1010,
    master - mean (1,003ms)  : 983, 1022
     .   : milestone, 1003,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (5386) - mean (112ms)  : 109, 115
     .   : milestone, 112,
    master - mean (111ms)  : 106, 115
     .   : milestone, 111,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (5386) - mean (723ms)  : 701, 745
     .   : milestone, 723,
    master - mean (717ms)  : 692, 742
     .   : milestone, 717,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (5386) - mean (94ms)  : 90, 98
     .   : milestone, 94,
    master - mean (94ms)  : 90, 98
     .   : milestone, 94,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (5386) - mean (679ms)  : 657, 700
     .   : milestone, 679,
    master - mean (676ms)  : 651, 700
     .   : milestone, 676,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.6.2) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (5386) - mean (188ms)  : 185, 191
     .   : milestone, 188,
    master - mean (187ms)  : 182, 193
     .   : milestone, 187,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (5386) - mean (1,077ms)  : 1052, 1101
     .   : milestone, 1077,
    master - mean (1,077ms)  : 1056, 1097
     .   : milestone, 1077,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (5386) - mean (272ms)  : 268, 276
     .   : milestone, 272,
    master - mean (270ms)  : 264, 277
     .   : milestone, 270,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (5386) - mean (878ms)  : 848, 908
     .   : milestone, 878,
    master - mean (868ms)  : 847, 889
     .   : milestone, 868,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (5386) - mean (260ms)  : 254, 266
     .   : milestone, 260,
    master - mean (260ms)  : 253, 266
     .   : milestone, 260,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (5386) - mean (857ms)  : 831, 884
     .   : milestone, 857,
    master - mean (855ms)  : 824, 887
     .   : milestone, 855,

Loading

@andrewlock
Copy link
Member Author

andrewlock commented Apr 3, 2024

Benchmarks Report for tracer 🐌

Benchmarks for #5386 compared to master:

  • 1 benchmarks are faster, with geometric mean 1.132
  • 3 benchmarks are slower, with geometric mean 1.149
  • 1 benchmarks have fewer allocations

The following thresholds were used for comparing the benchmark speeds:

  • Mann–Whitney U test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 10% and 0.3 ns are considered.

Allocation changes below 0.5% are ignored.

Benchmark details

Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master StartStopWithChild net6.0 8.82μs 48.5ns 295ns 0.0176 0.00879 0 7.51 KB
master StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1 10.6μs 53ns 249ns 0.0268 0.0107 0 7.6 KB
master StartStopWithChild net472 16.9μs 50.1ns 194ns 1.35 0.337 0.11 8.05 KB
#5386 StartStopWithChild net6.0 8.59μs 48.7ns 334ns 0.0272 0.00906 0 7.51 KB
#5386 StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1 10.6μs 55.2ns 253ns 0.0261 0.0104 0 7.6 KB
#5386 StartStopWithChild net472 16.9μs 75.9ns 284ns 1.35 0.356 0.0932 8.05 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 461μs 362ns 1.4μs 0 0 0 2.7 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 604μs 303ns 1.17μs 0 0 0 2.7 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 817μs 3.87μs 18.2μs 0.403 0 0 3.3 KB
#5386 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 462μs 1.07μs 3.99μs 0 0 0 2.7 KB
#5386 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 608μs 1.41μs 5.44μs 0 0 0 2.7 KB
#5386 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 813μs 243ns 840ns 0.408 0 0 3.3 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendRequest net6.0 174μs 217ns 839ns 0.174 0 0 18.33 KB
master SendRequest netcoreapp3.1 191μs 293ns 1.1μs 0.19 0 0 20.49 KB
master SendRequest net472 0.000539ns 0.000291ns 0.00105ns 0 0 0 0 b
#5386 SendRequest net6.0 175μs 208ns 805ns 0.174 0 0 18.33 KB
#5386 SendRequest netcoreapp3.1 193μs 305ns 1.18μs 0.193 0 0 20.49 KB
#5386 SendRequest net472 0.000605ns 0.000224ns 0.000869ns 0 0 0 0 b
Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Fewer allocations 🎉

Fewer allocations 🎉 in #5386

Benchmark Base Allocated Diff Allocated Change Change %
Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces‑net6.0 41.75 KB 41.53 KB -217 B -0.52%

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 549μs 259ns 1μs 0.551 0 0 41.75 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 654μs 938ns 3.63μs 0.324 0 0 41.74 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 899μs 4.22μs 16.3μs 8.04 2.23 0.446 53.24 KB
#5386 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 543μs 1.01μs 3.9μs 0.546 0 0 41.53 KB
#5386 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 670μs 842ns 3.15μs 0.34 0 0 41.79 KB
#5386 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 838μs 3.2μs 12.4μs 8.08 2.55 0.425 53.23 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.DbCommandBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master ExecuteNonQuery net6.0 1.18μs 0.318ns 1.23ns 0.0107 0 0 784 B
master ExecuteNonQuery netcoreapp3.1 1.53μs 0.851ns 3.3ns 0.0105 0 0 784 B
master ExecuteNonQuery net472 1.73μs 1.19ns 4.6ns 0.118 0 0 746 B
#5386 ExecuteNonQuery net6.0 1.13μs 0.595ns 2.31ns 0.0108 0 0 784 B
#5386 ExecuteNonQuery netcoreapp3.1 1.47μs 1.47ns 5.71ns 0.0109 0 0 784 B
#5386 ExecuteNonQuery net472 1.81μs 1.21ns 4.68ns 0.118 0 0 746 B
Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark - Slower ⚠️ Same allocations ✔️

Slower ⚠️ in #5386

Benchmark diff/base Base Median (ns) Diff Median (ns) Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync‑net6.0 1.123 1,299.70 1,459.98

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master CallElasticsearch net6.0 1.32μs 1.32ns 5.13ns 0.0144 0 0 1.01 KB
master CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1 1.57μs 0.883ns 3.3ns 0.0139 0 0 1.01 KB
master CallElasticsearch net472 2.47μs 1.15ns 4.13ns 0.161 0 0 1.02 KB
master CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0 1.3μs 0.506ns 1.89ns 0.0137 0 0 984 B
master CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.63μs 0.751ns 2.81ns 0.0144 0 0 1.06 KB
master CallElasticsearchAsync net472 2.67μs 1.07ns 4.15ns 0.17 0 0 1.08 KB
#5386 CallElasticsearch net6.0 1.25μs 0.482ns 1.87ns 0.0145 0 0 1.01 KB
#5386 CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1 1.59μs 0.626ns 2.34ns 0.0139 0 0 1.01 KB
#5386 CallElasticsearch net472 2.48μs 1.05ns 4.05ns 0.161 0 0 1.02 KB
#5386 CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0 1.46μs 1.15ns 4.46ns 0.0139 0 0 984 B
#5386 CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.76μs 2.48ns 9.6ns 0.0139 0 0 1.06 KB
#5386 CallElasticsearchAsync net472 2.7μs 1.95ns 7.29ns 0.17 0 0 1.08 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master ExecuteAsync net6.0 1.24μs 0.545ns 2.11ns 0.013 0 0 928 B
master ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.69μs 1.05ns 3.92ns 0.0125 0 0 928 B
master ExecuteAsync net472 1.91μs 0.712ns 2.67ns 0.141 0 0 891 B
#5386 ExecuteAsync net6.0 1.31μs 1.01ns 3.76ns 0.0131 0 0 928 B
#5386 ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.75μs 2.08ns 8.05ns 0.0123 0 0 928 B
#5386 ExecuteAsync net472 1.89μs 2.05ns 7.94ns 0.141 0.000952 0 891 B
Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendAsync net6.0 4.04μs 2.09ns 7.8ns 0.0302 0 0 2.16 KB
master SendAsync netcoreapp3.1 5.16μs 1.43ns 5.37ns 0.0362 0 0 2.7 KB
master SendAsync net472 7.56μs 3.82ns 14.8ns 0.484 0 0 3.05 KB
#5386 SendAsync net6.0 4.19μs 3.27ns 12.2ns 0.0296 0 0 2.16 KB
#5386 SendAsync netcoreapp3.1 4.96μs 7.78ns 30.1ns 0.0343 0 0 2.7 KB
#5386 SendAsync net472 7.65μs 8.46ns 32.8ns 0.481 0 0 3.05 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 1.5μs 1.13ns 4.37ns 0.0233 0 0 1.65 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 2.15μs 0.918ns 3.43ns 0.0219 0 0 1.65 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 2.73μs 2.51ns 9.74ns 0.25 0 0 1.57 KB
#5386 EnrichedLog net6.0 1.53μs 0.403ns 1.51ns 0.023 0 0 1.65 KB
#5386 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 2.29μs 0.95ns 3.68ns 0.0225 0 0 1.65 KB
#5386 EnrichedLog net472 2.62μs 1.57ns 6.07ns 0.249 0 0 1.57 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 111μs 105ns 407ns 0 0 0 4.23 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 117μs 132ns 513ns 0.0587 0 0 4.23 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 145μs 64.1ns 248ns 0.654 0.218 0 4.41 KB
#5386 EnrichedLog net6.0 112μs 90.2ns 349ns 0.0559 0 0 4.23 KB
#5386 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 119μs 138ns 518ns 0 0 0 4.23 KB
#5386 EnrichedLog net472 146μs 119ns 460ns 0.658 0.219 0 4.41 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.NLogBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 3.26μs 1.31ns 5.07ns 0.0311 0 0 2.21 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 4.08μs 2.63ns 10.2ns 0.0305 0 0 2.21 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 5μs 2.36ns 8.82ns 0.321 0 0 2.02 KB
#5386 EnrichedLog net6.0 3.1μs 1.84ns 6.9ns 0.0311 0 0 2.21 KB
#5386 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 4.3μs 2.89ns 11.2ns 0.03 0 0 2.21 KB
#5386 EnrichedLog net472 4.93μs 4.25ns 16.5ns 0.321 0 0 2.02 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendReceive net6.0 1.52μs 1.01ns 3.9ns 0.016 0 0 1.18 KB
master SendReceive netcoreapp3.1 1.79μs 1.17ns 4.38ns 0.016 0 0 1.18 KB
master SendReceive net472 2.37μs 1.59ns 6.16ns 0.187 0 0 1.18 KB
#5386 SendReceive net6.0 1.4μs 0.625ns 2.25ns 0.0161 0 0 1.18 KB
#5386 SendReceive netcoreapp3.1 1.75μs 0.495ns 1.78ns 0.0157 0 0 1.18 KB
#5386 SendReceive net472 2.18μs 1.43ns 5.36ns 0.187 0 0 1.18 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 2.76μs 1.05ns 4.06ns 0.0219 0 0 1.55 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 4μs 0.974ns 3.51ns 0.022 0 0 1.6 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 4.45μs 2.02ns 7.81ns 0.314 0 0 1.99 KB
#5386 EnrichedLog net6.0 2.76μs 0.991ns 3.84ns 0.0222 0 0 1.55 KB
#5386 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 4.07μs 1.22ns 4.71ns 0.0204 0 0 1.6 KB
#5386 EnrichedLog net472 4.41μs 2.37ns 9.17ns 0.316 0 0 1.99 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark - Slower ⚠️ Same allocations ✔️

Slower ⚠️ in #5386

Benchmark diff/base Base Median (ns) Diff Median (ns) Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan‑net6.0 1.205 456.10 549.61

Faster 🎉 in #5386

Benchmark base/diff Base Median (ns) Diff Median (ns) Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan‑netcoreapp3.1 1.132 777.01 686.61

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master StartFinishSpan net6.0 457ns 1.04ns 4.04ns 0.00774 0 0 552 B
master StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1 778ns 2.42ns 9.36ns 0.00729 0 0 552 B
master StartFinishSpan net472 779ns 1.64ns 6.15ns 0.0876 0 0 554 B
master StartFinishScope net6.0 609ns 1.34ns 5.21ns 0.00935 0 0 672 B
master StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1 856ns 1.34ns 5.02ns 0.00896 0 0 672 B
master StartFinishScope net472 935ns 1.28ns 4.94ns 0.1 0 0 634 B
#5386 StartFinishSpan net6.0 550ns 0.792ns 3.07ns 0.00782 0 0 552 B
#5386 StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1 686ns 1.3ns 4.85ns 0.00736 0 0 552 B
#5386 StartFinishSpan net472 800ns 0.978ns 3.79ns 0.0879 0 0 554 B
#5386 StartFinishScope net6.0 550ns 1.47ns 5.68ns 0.00947 0 0 672 B
#5386 StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1 890ns 1.07ns 4.15ns 0.00882 0 0 672 B
#5386 StartFinishScope net472 891ns 1.59ns 6.17ns 0.101 0 0 634 B
Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark - Slower ⚠️ Same allocations ✔️

Slower ⚠️ in #5386

Benchmark diff/base Base Median (ns) Diff Median (ns) Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin‑net472 1.120 1,021.87 1,144.02

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master RunOnMethodBegin net6.0 638ns 0.91ns 3.52ns 0.0093 0 0 672 B
master RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1 944ns 1.74ns 6.76ns 0.00916 0 0 672 B
master RunOnMethodBegin net472 1.02μs 1.18ns 4.42ns 0.101 0 0 634 B
#5386 RunOnMethodBegin net6.0 665ns 0.999ns 3.87ns 0.00939 0 0 672 B
#5386 RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1 923ns 1.59ns 5.95ns 0.00903 0 0 672 B
#5386 RunOnMethodBegin net472 1.14μs 2.67ns 10.3ns 0.101 0 0 634 B

@andrewlock andrewlock marked this pull request as ready for review April 3, 2024 10:21
@andrewlock andrewlock requested a review from a team as a code owner April 3, 2024 10:21
@andrewlock
Copy link
Member Author

Throughput/Crank Report:zap:

Throughput results for AspNetCoreSimpleController comparing the following branches/commits:

Cases where throughput results for the PR are worse than latest master (5% drop or greater), results are shown in red.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see one of the many, many dashboards!

gantt
    title Throughput Linux x64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (5386) (11.239M)   : 0, 11238645
    master (11.713M)   : 0, 11712713
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (11.269M)   : 0, 11269029

    section Automatic
    This PR (5386) (7.884M)   : 0, 7884189
    master (7.970M)   : 0, 7970298
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (8.101M)   : 0, 8100962

    section Trace stats
    This PR (5386) (8.223M)   : 0, 8222894
    master (8.309M)   : 0, 8309370

    section Manual
    This PR (5386) (9.941M)   : 0, 9941351
    master (10.107M)   : 0, 10107374

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (5386) (7.467M)   : 0, 7467302
    master (7.592M)   : 0, 7591882

    section Version Conflict
    This PR (5386) (6.682M)   : 0, 6682297
    master (6.799M)   : 0, 6799241

Loading
gantt
    title Throughput Linux arm64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (5386) (9.486M)   : 0, 9486105
    master (9.521M)   : 0, 9520620
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (9.648M)   : 0, 9648037

    section Automatic
    This PR (5386) (6.536M)   : 0, 6536406
    master (6.557M)   : 0, 6557237

    section Trace stats
    This PR (5386) (6.938M)   : 0, 6937958
    master (6.958M)   : 0, 6958067

    section Manual
    This PR (5386) (8.146M)   : 0, 8145535
    master (8.209M)   : 0, 8209424

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (5386) (6.195M)   : 0, 6194611
    master (6.187M)   : 0, 6187080

    section Version Conflict
    This PR (5386) (5.609M)   : 0, 5608709
    master (5.613M)   : 0, 5612669

Loading
gantt
    title Throughput Windows x64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (5386) (8.864M)   : 0, 8864217
    master (8.806M)   : 0, 8806035
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (8.991M)   : 0, 8990879

    section Automatic
    This PR (5386) (6.188M)   : 0, 6187835
    master (6.106M)   : 0, 6106236
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (6.362M)   : 0, 6361714

    section Trace stats
    This PR (5386) (6.382M)   : 0, 6382402
    master (6.459M)   : 0, 6458941

    section Manual
    This PR (5386) (7.674M)   : 0, 7673833
    master (7.422M)   : 0, 7422112

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (5386) (5.859M)   : 0, 5859235
    master (5.963M)   : 0, 5962899

    section Version Conflict
    This PR (5386) (5.291M)   : 0, 5291334
    master (5.237M)   : 0, 5237367

Loading

Copy link
Contributor

@shurivich shurivich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@daniel-romano-DD daniel-romano-DD left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks a lot

@andrewlock andrewlock merged commit dae0a2f into master Apr 3, 2024
61 of 66 checks passed
@andrewlock andrewlock deleted the andrew/ci/fix-docker-compose branch April 3, 2024 11:38
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the vNext milestone Apr 3, 2024
@andrewlock andrewlock modified the milestones: vNext, vNext-v2 Apr 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:builds project files, build scripts, pipelines, versioning, releases, packages
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants