RUM-3460: Fix padding and resizing issue for image view mapper

[ambushwork]

What does this PR do?

In app development, clients usually use paddings to resize the content drawable in a given size image view, prior to this PR we didn't taken into account these paddings to resize our image wireframe, which leads some images/icons bigger than real.

So the updates in this PR:

• Add paddings for a demo image view in sample app
• Add paddings calculation in resolveParentRectAbsPosition function
• Fix the issue that GradientDrawable didn't take into account the width&height after resizing.

Motivation

RUM-3460

Demo

Anything else we should know when reviewing?

Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)

• Feature or bugfix MUST have appropriate tests (unit, integration, e2e)
• Make sure you discussed the feature or bugfix with the maintaining team in an Issue
• Make sure each commit and the PR mention the Issue number (cf the CONTRIBUTING doc)

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 81.81818% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 70.37%. Comparing base (b1d6ebb) to head (39c3e59).
Report is 5 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...replay/internal/recorder/mapper/ImageViewMapper.kt	33.33%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #2372      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    70.30%   70.37%   +0.07%     
===========================================
  Files          744      744              
  Lines        27721    27726       +5     
  Branches      4630     4630              
===========================================
+ Hits         19488    19512      +24     
+ Misses        6947     6936      -11     
+ Partials      1286     1278       -8     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
.../recorder/resources/DefaultImageWireframeHelper.kt	95.30% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
...oid/sessionreplay/internal/utils/ImageViewUtils.kt	97.44% <100.00%> (+0.09%)	⬆️
...replay/internal/recorder/mapper/ImageViewMapper.kt	92.11% <33.33%> (-5.12%)	⬇️

... and 31 files with indirect coverage changes

[xgouchet]

Note

Shouldn't we have some unit tests around those functions ?

[ambushwork]

Note

Shouldn't we have some unit tests around those functions ?

@xgouchet there are unit tests around these, I just updated with the padding case to cover it better, and instrumented test payloads are regenerated for them.