-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improvement to traditional installation guidelines #16
Comments
I'm not sure what packages could be missing because I determined the dependencies using Did the users that experienced the problem really install all of those packages? Line 35 in 54ee6d2
This list is the dependency list that is put into the Debian package created by CPack, and I was able to install this package on a clean Ubuntu. This is the output of
Maybe they used a non Debian-based distro? |
Ahh I'm sorry now I get it, you meant not the direct package dependencies but also the build toolchain etc. Then let's just add the packages that come in our Docker images. For just building that would be: Lines 25 to 31 in 54ee6d2
And then the additional tools: Lines 52 to 60 in 54ee6d2
Mayben we then should also add instructions on how to set up the python environment for the h52xdmf script? In the Dockerfile that would correspond to: Lines 84 to 88 in 54ee6d2
I can update the README accordingly if you are fine with the above suggestions :) |
Closed via #22 |
The traditional installation option offered by @siggmo is a popular choice for quickly trying out FANS by multiple users.
I was wondering if it can be improved a bit more by identifying and adding every single dependency of FANS including but not limited to gcc/ g++, CMake, git, htop, time.
This would make the traditional installation guide very exhaustive and by far the easiest way to get all the dependencies installed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: