Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pause governance #146

Closed
JakeHartnell opened this issue Jan 30, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

Pause governance #146

JakeHartnell opened this issue Jan 30, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@JakeHartnell
Copy link
Member

As a DAO, we would like to vote to pause governance for a certain period of time. During this frozen period no proposals can be made or executed, and voting is disabled.

Talking with @ben2x4 made me realize that this a simple and very important feature... and useful in a number of cases.

@elsehow
Copy link
Collaborator

elsehow commented Jan 30, 2022 via email

@JakeHartnell
Copy link
Member Author

honest question: when might a DAO need to do this?

Still thinking about this... not 100% sure it's needed. Need more real world testing...

  • When it launches. For example, if a DAO launches with a certain amount of DAO tokens in it's treasury. A user or small group of users could perhaps race to stake their tokens and pass a proposal.

  • Moving the DAO. For whatever reason, a DAO may want to transfer it's operations to another DAO contract. People would need to unstake their DAO tokens for the old contract, and restake with the new. As not many people would have staked with the new DAO, it could be in a temporary vulnerable state.

  • Taking a break. DAOs operate 24/7, but humans don't communities may wish to simply take a collective break or holiday.

@elsehow
Copy link
Collaborator

elsehow commented Jan 30, 2022

These are all perfectly reasonable. The "race" (kind of like a timing attack on governance) seems especially important. Can you imagine if delays with an IBC relayer cause an important proposal to pass/fail?

JakeHartnell added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 1, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants