rename old block contents #7682
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We can just deprecate SignedBlindedBlockContents and BlindedBlockContents. My understanding is we would need to rename the current BlockContents and SignedBlockContents though to Old and create the new ones as per ethereum/beacon-APIs#369
|
Closing it, too many conflict, will raise a new PR |
Yeah. Sorry about that. Think now it's cleaner so can just rename |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR Description
SignedBlindedBlockContentstoSignedBlindedBlockContentsOldand deprecate itBlindedBlockContentstoBlindedBlockContentsOldand deprecate itFixed Issue(s)
#7651
#7654
Documentation
doc-change-requiredlabel to this PR if updates are required.Changelog