Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rpc blobs bug fix + blobsUtil endianness + integration tests #7200

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Jun 1, 2023

Conversation

tbenr
Copy link
Contributor

@tbenr tbenr commented May 30, 2023

fixes: #7216
fixes: #7183
fixes: #6834

Documentation

  • I thought about documentation and added the doc-change-required label to this PR if updates are required.

Changelog

  • I thought about adding a changelog entry, and added one if I deemed necessary.

@tbenr tbenr force-pushed the rpc_blobs_integration_test branch from dfb3ea7 to 9883a9f Compare May 31, 2023 11:32
@tbenr tbenr changed the title Rpc blobs integration test Rpc blobs bug fix + integration tests May 31, 2023
@tbenr tbenr changed the title Rpc blobs bug fix + integration tests Rpc blobs bug fix + blobsUtil endianness + integration tests May 31, 2023
@tbenr tbenr force-pushed the rpc_blobs_integration_test branch from 524b849 to ae9ac9e Compare June 1, 2023 09:03
@tbenr tbenr marked this pull request as ready for review June 1, 2023 16:24
Copy link
Contributor

@StefanBratanov StefanBratanov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM with one javadoc nit

Copy link
Contributor

@StefanBratanov StefanBratanov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM with one javadoc nit

new BlobSidecarsByRangeRequestMessage(
firstSupportedSlot,
updatedCount,
spec.getMaxBlobsPerBlock(firstSupportedSlot.plus(updatedCount))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should be technically .plus(updatedCount).minus(1)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

right.. good point

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

put it on the other place too

@tbenr tbenr enabled auto-merge (squash) June 1, 2023 17:14
@tbenr tbenr merged commit 41ca518 into Consensys:master Jun 1, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants