We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi @oriol ,
In CII, BR-CL-10 uses:
<rule context="//ram:GlobalID[@schemeID][not(ancestor::ram:SpecifiedTradeProduct)]" flag="fatal">
and the selector and BR-CL-26 uses:
<rule context="ram:ApplicableHeaderTradeDelivery/ram:ShipToTradeParty/ram:GlobalID[@schemeID]" flag="fatal">
They conflict for the ram:ShipToTradeParty/ram:GlobalID element.
ram:ShipToTradeParty/ram:GlobalID
We think the resolution to this can be to change BR-CL-10 to
//ram:GlobalID[@schemeID][not(ancestor::ram:SpecifiedTradeProduct) and not(ancestor::ram:ShipToTradeParty)]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Done as suggested, but shouldn't it be better to just remove BR-CL-26?
Sorry, something went wrong.
changed context for BR-CL-10 in CII. Closes #307
39f9f0e
Yes, alternatively a removal of BR-CL-26 would also work I assume
Will keep it as is, with the two rules and the new context
No branches or pull requests
Hi @oriol ,
In CII, BR-CL-10 uses:
and the selector and BR-CL-26 uses:
They conflict for the
ram:ShipToTradeParty/ram:GlobalID
element.We think the resolution to this can be to change BR-CL-10 to
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: