-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
invalid operand for instruction cmpli
#1419
Comments
Yeah. Looks like gas will accept an implied L=0 when building in 32-bit mode. I do see some mention of a three-argument version in some old docs, but that's for omitting the CR field, not the L field. Sent a kernel patch for it: https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au/T/#u |
Thank you for the patch and adding the URL here. Maybe you could also add the URL of the GitHub issue to the commit message.
|
In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Fix is now in my next branch. |
[ Upstream commit fef071b ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071b ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071b ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071b ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071b ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071b ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071b ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071b ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071b ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071b ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071b ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071b ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1952579 [ Upstream commit fef071b ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fef071be57dc43679a32d5b0e6ee176d6f12e9f2 ] In dcr-low.S we use cmpli with three arguments, instead of four arguments as defined in the ISA: cmpli cr0,r3,1024 This appears to be a PPC440-ism, looking at the "PPC440x5 CPU Core User’s Manual" it shows cmpli having no L field, but implied to be 0 due to the core being 32-bit. It mentions that the ISA defines four arguments and recommends using cmplwi. It also corresponds to the old POWER instruction set, which had no L field there, a reserved bit instead. dcr-low.S is only built 32-bit, because it is only built when DCR_NATIVE=y, which is only selected by 40x and 44x. Looking at the generated code (with gcc/gas) we see cmplwi as expected. Although gas is happy with the 3-argument version when building for 32-bit, the LLVM assembler is not and errors out with: arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr-low.S:27:10: error: invalid operand for instruction cmpli 0,%r3,1024; ... ^ Switch to the cmplwi extended opcode, which avoids any confusion when reading the ISA, fixes the issue with the LLVM assembler, and also means the code could be built 64-bit in future (though that's very unlikely). Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> BugLink: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1419 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211014024424.528848-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
working around #675
It looks like the diagnostic is referring to the
cmpli
instructions.I think
cmpli
should have 4 operands, not 3?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: