Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

in the python binding, use the local types #471

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 18, 2024
Merged

in the python binding, use the local types #471

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 18, 2024

Conversation

arvidn
Copy link
Contributor

@arvidn arvidn commented Apr 18, 2024 •
edited
Loading

instead of types from chia.types.blockchain_format

@arvidn arvidn requested a review from Rigidity April 18, 2024 06:04
@arvidn arvidn force-pushed the sized-bytes-binding branch from 2c2f2be to af480b3 Compare April 18, 2024 06:17
@arvidn arvidn changed the title in the python binding, use the local version of sized_bytes in the python binding, use the local types Apr 18, 2024
@coveralls-official Coveralls Official
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 8733299118

Details

  • 2 of 2 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 2 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 85.388%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 8705995518: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 11220
Relevant Lines: 13140
💛 - Coveralls

@pmaslana pmaslana merged commit 26c28e6 into main Apr 18, 2024
64 checks passed
@pmaslana pmaslana deleted the sized-bytes-binding branch April 18, 2024 15:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Rigidity Rigidity Rigidity approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
ready_to_merge
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@arvidn @Rigidity @pmaslana