add moonshot api #5156
add moonshot api #5156
Conversation
|
@lloydzhou is attempting to deploy a commit to the NextChat Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@lloydzhou has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 22 minutes and 46 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe recent changes enhance the application by integrating a new model provider, Moonshot, into the authentication and API handling mechanisms. This includes updates across multiple files to support new routes, API interactions, and configuration settings, ensuring robust error handling and management for Moonshot requests. The modifications allow the application to seamlessly interact with Moonshot's functionalities, expanding its versatility and capabilities. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant Auth
participant MoonshotAPI
participant Server
Client->>Auth: Request with ModelProvider.Moonshot
Auth->>Server: Validate Moonshot API Key
alt Valid API Key
Server->>MoonshotAPI: Process Request
MoonshotAPI-->>Server: Return Response
Server-->>Auth: Forward Response
Auth-->>Client: Return Response
else Invalid API Key
Auth-->>Client: Return 401 Unauthorized
end
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Your build has completed! |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (7)
- app/api/auth.ts (1 hunks)
- app/api/moonshot/[...path]/route.ts (1 hunks)
- app/client/api.ts (6 hunks)
- app/client/platforms/moonshot.ts (1 hunks)
- app/config/server.ts (3 hunks)
- app/constant.ts (7 hunks)
- app/store/access.ts (4 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (25)
app/api/auth.ts (1)
88-90: LGTM!The new case for
ModelProvider.Moonshotcorrectly assignsserverConfig.moonshotApiKeytosystemApiKey.app/api/moonshot/[...path]/route.ts (3)
17-41: LGTM!The
handlefunction correctly handles incoming requests, performs authentication for Moonshot, and proxies the request.
67-153: LGTM!The
requestfunction correctly constructs the request to be proxied to Moonshot, including handling URL construction, setting headers, handling timeouts, and processing the response.
107-136: LGTM!The
isModelAvailableInServerfunction correctly checks if a given model is available in the server configuration.app/store/access.ts (4)
42-44: LGTM!The
DEFAULT_MOONSHOT_URLconstant correctly constructs the URL for the Moonshot API based on the application's context.
89-92: LGTM!The
DEFAULT_ACCESS_STATEconstant correctly includesmoonshotUrlandmoonshotApiKeyfor storing Moonshot-specific configuration.
145-147: LGTM!The
isValidMoonshotmethod correctly checks the validity of the Moonshot API key.
161-161: LGTM!The
isAuthorizedmethod correctly includes the Moonshot API key validation in the overall authorization check.app/config/server.ts (2)
60-63: LGTM!The addition of
MOONSHOT_URLandMOONSHOT_API_KEYto theProcessEnvinterface is consistent with the existing pattern for other providers.
127-129: LGTM!The integration of Moonshot-specific configurations in
getServerSideConfigis consistent with the existing pattern for other providers.Also applies to: 176-179
app/client/api.ts (3)
15-15: LGTM!The addition of the
MoonshotApiimport statement is straightforward and necessary for the integration of the Moonshot provider.
121-123: LGTM!The addition of the Moonshot case in the
ClientApiconstructor is consistent with the existing pattern for other providers.
Line range hint
206-228:
LGTM!The integration of Moonshot-specific logic in
getHeadersandgetClientApiis consistent with the existing pattern for other providers.Also applies to: 278-279
app/client/platforms/moonshot.ts (5)
1-37: LGTM! But clarify thedisableListModelsproperty.The implementation of the
MoonshotApiclass follows the existing pattern for other providers. However, thedisableListModelsproperty is set totruewithout explanation.Could you please clarify why
disableListModelsis set totrue?
38-63: LGTM!The implementation of the
pathmethod follows the existing pattern for other providers and correctly constructs the base URL for Moonshot API requests.
65-67: LGTM!The implementation of the
extractMessagemethod follows the existing pattern for other providers and correctly extracts the message content from the response.
69-240: LGTM!The implementation of the
chatmethod follows the existing pattern for other providers and correctly handles chat requests and responses, including streaming responses.
241-250: LGTM! But clarify themodelsmethod.The implementation of the
usageandmodelsmethods follows the existing pattern for other providers. However, themodelsmethod returns an empty array, which might need further implementation.Could you please clarify if the
modelsmethod is intended to return an empty array, or if further implementation is needed?app/constant.ts (7)
25-25: LGTM!The addition of the
MOONSHOT_BASE_URLconstant is correct.
51-51: LGTM!The addition of the
Moonshotentry to theApiPathenum is correct.
105-105: LGTM!The addition of the
Moonshotentry to theServiceProviderenum is correct.
126-126: LGTM!The addition of the
Moonshotentry to theModelProviderenum is correct.
190-193: LGTM!The addition of the
Moonshotconstant withExampleEndpointandChatPathis correct.
301-301: LGTM!The addition of the
moonshotModesarray is correct.
367-375: LGTM!The integration of
moonshotModesinto theDEFAULT_MODELSexport is correct.
|
π» εζ΄η±»ε | Change Type
π εζ΄θ―΄ζ | Description of Change
π θ‘₯ε δΏ‘ζ― | Additional Information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
MoonshotApiclass for streamlined chat interactions with the language model.Bug Fixes
Documentation