-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 126
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove checks for equivocatory blocks #2596
Conversation
This reverts commit d8e422c.
created by primary block producer
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## development #2596 +/- ##
===============================================
+ Coverage 62.44% 62.99% +0.54%
===============================================
Files 211 211
Lines 27354 27136 -218
===============================================
+ Hits 17082 17095 +13
+ Misses 8633 8482 -151
+ Partials 1639 1559 -80
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Co-authored-by: Eclésio Junior <eclesiomelo.1@gmail.com>
…/gossamer into kishan/fix/equivocatory-blocks
Co-authored-by: Timothy Wu <timwu20@gmail.com>
…/gossamer into kishan/fix/equivocatory-blocks
🎉 This PR is included in version 0.7.0 🎉 The release is available on GitHub release Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Changes
We have logic to find different blocks with same block number and same author. If we find such blocks we throw and error.
Some of the discussion is here #2541 (comment)
#2541 (comment)
As discussed with @noot , it's probably authoring one as primary and one as secondary. If we don't error the fork should get resolved eventually.
Tests
go test -tags integration github.com/ChainSafe/gossamer
Issues
Fixes #2597
Primary Reviewer
@timwu20