These crates may be used to inspect and validate the internal state of Filecoin Actors.
For the smart-contracts, see:
https://github.com/filecoin-project/builtin-actors
NOTE: The code in actors/
and fil_actors_shared/
is copy-pasted from the
above repository. Therefore, it's advised to avoid refactoring such code in
order to facilitate a smoother version upgrade process and potentially automate
it.
Given the copy-paste nature of the code, it's important to understand the reasons behind it, as it's not obvious at first glance.
We copy only a small subset of the code, strictly around actor releases which happen ~3 times a year. This is not a huge burden to maintain.
Note that the approach here is similar to the one in go-state-types.
The builtin-actors are not
following semver and in the current structure it would be hard to do so.
Dependency update in a particular actor version might require a major version
bump. Dependencies of the actors code not unified and so actors vX
might use
completely different version of cid
than actors vX+1
. This creates
compilation and linking issues in the downstream projects that depend on the
actors code.
In the builtin-actors, the prior versions of the actors are not maintained. Any security issues found in the actors code are fixed in the latest version and the older versions are not updated. This creates a security risk for the projects that depend on the actors code (and not the smart-contracts). By copying the code, the projects can maintain the security of the actors code by updating the code to the latest version.
Given the current approach, the code that exists here might not be exactly the same as the one released in the WASM bundles. This shouldn't be an issue, as most of it is not used for calculations but as state definitions.
The existence of most of the code in the actors/
and fil_actors_shared/
directories could be avoided by having different versioning in the
builtin-actors. Each actor
release, e.g., actors_v14
, would be a separate directory in the repository. As
such, it would allow the release to follow semver and keep the dependencies
across all actors up-to-date. On the other hand, the code would still need to be
copied on new releases so it's shifting the problem rather than solving it. That
said, it's a valid approach and could be considered in the future.