Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use 'eth_sendTransaction' for CAIP-27 example. 'personal_sign' is not… #314

Merged

Conversation

adonesky1
Copy link
Contributor

'personal_sign' is an offchain signing method (more appropriate to the new proposed Wallet namespace) and therefore a bad example for CAIP-27

Copy link
Collaborator

@bumblefudge bumblefudge left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I totally agree!

In fact, a second PR adding an additional example with personal_sign sent, targeted to wallet:eip155 rather than eip155:1 (or eip155:0 for that matter) might be a useful addition, here and/or in a profile for the namespaces repo, i.e. in the wallet/caip25.md profile 😎

1 review from hassan or two from non-codeowners and we merge

@bumblefudge bumblefudge merged commit 8ad30fc into ChainAgnostic:main Jul 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants