Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge fitWorkflow branch to basicMacroImplementation one #6

Open
wants to merge 45 commits into
base: working-basicMacroImplementation
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sarafiorendi
Copy link
Contributor

As agreed, the idea is to have just one branch which can be used both for the efficiency computation and to perform the fit to reco MC (useful for the SFs optimisation).

I created this branch, which is basically the same as working-fitWorkflow(*) in order to be able to see the real comparison wrt the base branch (as explained here).

(*)
git checkout -b official-fitWorkflow-toMerge origin/working-fitWorkflow
git merge origin/working-basicMacroImplementation

  • fixed a couple of conflicts
  • update readme
  • keep plotEff.cc from basicMacroImplementation, which was fixed in PR3

aboletti and others added 30 commits May 23, 2019 11:33
…using KDE efficiency and with the possibility of using pre-computed integrals
… rooFitResult objects

(cherry picked from commit d3a0a7a)
…fitWorkflow

Including README file and two minor fixes from working-basicMacroImplementation
…fitWorkflow

Including from working-basicMacroImplementation splitting of dataset workspace and usage of folder for produced files
…macros, improve file managment in HTCondor executable
…fitWorkflow

Including the use of ROOT batch mode in instructions
…tory structure, (3) included code to compute GEN-RECO deltaNLL in fit macro
…ns to include them, (2) sanity checks in run_preComp_Integrals_MC.sh macro
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants