Use deps.clj to launch deps.edn projects on Windows #1004
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What has Changed?
bb.exe is bundled and on Windows used to launch deps.edn projects
Project type Clojure CLI is renamed to deps.edn
Change deps.edn launch on windows to use bb.exe
Refactored some of how the executable and the rest of the command line is built. Also refactored how the
shell:
param to childprocess is determined.Since the project-types are set up statically, and we need to fetch the path to bb.exe dynamically, there is some non-config-driven parts introduced in jack-in.ts. I think that overall the refactoring made most things better, but then this eats away a bit of that... Anyway, I don't quite see how it could be avoided.
Fixes #1000
Might help with #997
TODO:
This needs to be tested
Mac
Linux
Windows
My Calva PR Checklist
I have:
dev
branch. (Or have specific reasons to target some other branch.)published
. (Sorry for the nagging.)[Unreleased]
entry inCHANGELOG.md
, linking the issue(s) that the PR is addressing.ci/circleci: build
test. NB: There is a CircleCI bug that makes the Artifacts hard to find. Please see this issue for workarounds.The Calva Team PR Checklist:
Before merging we (at least one of us) have:
dev
branch (unless reasons).Ping @PEZ, @kstehn, @cfehse, @bpringe