Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Differentiate witness txo-based seals from existing utxo-based seals #112

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 30, 2025

Conversation

dr-orlovsky
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@dr-orlovsky dr-orlovsky self-assigned this Jan 30, 2025
@dr-orlovsky dr-orlovsky mentioned this pull request Jan 30, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 30, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 6.25000% with 30 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 39.7%. Comparing base (0987784) to head (1487568).
Report is 3 commits behind head on v0.12.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
seals/src/wtxout.rs 3.7% 26 Missing ⚠️
src/bin/bpcore-stl.rs 0.0% 4 Missing ⚠️

❌ Your patch status has failed because the patch coverage (6.2%) is below the target coverage (60.0%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           v0.12    #112     +/-   ##
=======================================
- Coverage   39.8%   39.7%   -0.1%     
=======================================
  Files         28      29      +1     
  Lines       3129    3143     +14     
=======================================
+ Hits        1245    1247      +2     
- Misses      1884    1896     +12     
Flag Coverage Δ
rust 39.7% <6.2%> (-0.1%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant