-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update IotHub Quickstart sample to use latest Event Hubs SDK #11289
Labels
Milestone
Comments
ghost
added
the
needs-triage
Workflow: This is a new issue that needs to be triaged to the appropriate team.
label
May 7, 2020
ramya-rao-a
added
Client
This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library.
Event Hubs
labels
May 7, 2020
ghost
removed
the
needs-triage
Workflow: This is a new issue that needs to be triaged to the appropriate team.
label
May 7, 2020
It's merged |
openapi-sdkautomation bot
pushed a commit
to AzureSDKAutomation/azure-sdk-for-python
that referenced
this issue
Jan 11, 2021
[Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.DataLakeAnalytics to add version preview/2015-10-01-preview (Azure#11289) * Issue 8189082: Swagger Correctness: MICROSOFT.DATALAKEANALYTICS(null) * Issue 8189082: Swagger Correctness: MICROSOFT.DATALAKEANALYTICS(null) * build failue fix * Issue 8189082: Swagger Correctness: MICROSOFT.DATALAKEANALYTICS(null) * Issue 8189082: Swagger Correctness: MICROSOFT.DATALAKEANALYTICS(null) * Issue 8189082: Swagger Correctness: MICROSOFT.DATALAKEANALYTICS(null) * Issue 8189082: Swagger Correctness: MICROSOFT.DATALAKEANALYTICS(null) * Issue 8189082: Swagger Correctness: MICROSOFT.DATALAKEANALYTICS(null) * Issue 8189082: Swagger Correctness: MICROSOFT.DATALAKEANALYTICS(null) * Issue 8189082: Swagger Correctness: MICROSOFT.DATALAKEANALYTICS(null) * Issue 8189082: Swagger Correctness: MICROSOFT.DATALAKEANALYTICS(null) * Issue 8189082: Swagger Correctness: MICROSOFT.DATALAKEANALYTICS(null) * Issue 8189082: Swagger Correctness: MICROSOFT.DATALAKEANALYTICS(null) * Issue 8189082: Swagger Correctness: MICROSOFT.DATALAKEANALYTICS(null) * Issue 8189082: Swagger Correctness: MICROSOFT.DATALAKEANALYTICS(null) * Validation issue fix * Removing example JSON file is not referenced from the swagger file * Prettier Error Fix * Prettier Check fixes * typo fix and Removed breaking changes for Readonly field * Validation issue fix * prettier error fix * Reverting Readonly propertly fix * Semantic Validation fix * Semantic Validation fix * BreakingChange fix for 2015 preview version * ReadonlyPropertyChanged * ReadonlyPropertyChanged Fix * Swagger SemanticValidation failed Fix * prettier check fix * Fixing swagger issues * fixed model validation errors * Review feedback fix and adding default response * lint diff tool fixes * Removed Error codes and defaulted error response * Prettier fixes * breaking changes and sdk failure fixes * prettier fix * fixing merge conflicts * swagger lintdiff fixes * breaking changes fix * prettier fix * Update custom-words.txt * piepline Error Fix * Path fixed * duplicate path fix * Removed duplicate paths * Lintdiff fixes * lint diff fixes for list schema * code review comments * Swagger Model Validation Failure Fix * prettier fix Co-authored-by: Sravan Thupili <srthupil@microsoft.com>
openapi-sdkautomation bot
pushed a commit
to AzureSDKAutomation/azure-sdk-for-python
that referenced
this issue
Jan 11, 2021
[Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.DataLakeAnalytics to add version preview/2015-10-01-preview (Azure#11289) * Issue 8189082: Swagger Correctness: MICROSOFT.DATALAKEANALYTICS(null) * Issue 8189082: Swagger Correctness: MICROSOFT.DATALAKEANALYTICS(null) * build failue fix * Issue 8189082: Swagger Correctness: MICROSOFT.DATALAKEANALYTICS(null) * Issue 8189082: Swagger Correctness: MICROSOFT.DATALAKEANALYTICS(null) * Issue 8189082: Swagger Correctness: MICROSOFT.DATALAKEANALYTICS(null) * Issue 8189082: Swagger Correctness: MICROSOFT.DATALAKEANALYTICS(null) * Issue 8189082: Swagger Correctness: MICROSOFT.DATALAKEANALYTICS(null) * Issue 8189082: Swagger Correctness: MICROSOFT.DATALAKEANALYTICS(null) * Issue 8189082: Swagger Correctness: MICROSOFT.DATALAKEANALYTICS(null) * Issue 8189082: Swagger Correctness: MICROSOFT.DATALAKEANALYTICS(null) * Issue 8189082: Swagger Correctness: MICROSOFT.DATALAKEANALYTICS(null) * Issue 8189082: Swagger Correctness: MICROSOFT.DATALAKEANALYTICS(null) * Issue 8189082: Swagger Correctness: MICROSOFT.DATALAKEANALYTICS(null) * Issue 8189082: Swagger Correctness: MICROSOFT.DATALAKEANALYTICS(null) * Validation issue fix * Removing example JSON file is not referenced from the swagger file * Prettier Error Fix * Prettier Check fixes * typo fix and Removed breaking changes for Readonly field * Validation issue fix * prettier error fix * Reverting Readonly propertly fix * Semantic Validation fix * Semantic Validation fix * BreakingChange fix for 2015 preview version * ReadonlyPropertyChanged * ReadonlyPropertyChanged Fix * Swagger SemanticValidation failed Fix * prettier check fix * Fixing swagger issues * fixed model validation errors * Review feedback fix and adding default response * lint diff tool fixes * Removed Error codes and defaulted error response * Prettier fixes * breaking changes and sdk failure fixes * prettier fix * fixing merge conflicts * swagger lintdiff fixes * breaking changes fix * prettier fix * Update custom-words.txt * piepline Error Fix * Path fixed * duplicate path fix * Removed duplicate paths * Lintdiff fixes * lint diff fixes for list schema * code review comments * Swagger Model Validation Failure Fix * prettier fix Co-authored-by: Sravan Thupili <srthupil@microsoft.com>
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Labels
https://github.com/Azure-Samples/azure-iot-samples-python is the Python samples repo for IotHub. The read-d2c-messages folder is meant to contain sample that shows how to use the Event Hubs package to get events sent to IotHub.
Previously, this contained a link to the older event hub repo whose sample code would not work with the latest event hubs package and thus confusing users. I fixed that with Azure-Samples/azure-iot-samples-python#23 as a temporary stop gap to avoid users from being mislead.
This issue is to track the follow up work needed to update the samples repo with a real sample just like we did for node in Azure-Samples/azure-iot-samples-node#39
Please try and follow a similar model i.e
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: