Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bringing hydra pr237 to sdk #331

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 28, 2013
Merged

bringing hydra pr237 to sdk #331

merged 1 commit into from Nov 28, 2013

Conversation

jjclancy
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like this is bringing along a few other from hydra too...

@andrerod
Copy link

LGTM merging

andrerod pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2013
bringing hydra pr237 to sdk
@andrerod andrerod merged commit d41a5bf into Azure:master Nov 28, 2013
jethibau pushed a commit to jethibau/azure-sdk-for-net that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2018
* Fix for issue#296

* refresh inners to the latest Swagger spec
fixes for issues when creating Azure Table, Cassandra or Gremlin (Graph) Cosmos DB database accounts.
added support for offline/online region operations
added support for Virtual Network Rule ACLs

* Fix for issue Azure#329; adding proper implementation for the List methods.

* Fix for issue Azure#307 (Java repo), create fails when no write location was explicitly set

* Add sample for CosmosDB with Azure Table account and Virtual Network ACL rules
jsquire pushed a commit to jsquire/azure-sdk-for-net that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2019
Updating client version to 2.0 since we have a breaking change (Interface changes in IMessageReceiver)
Bumping up dotnet framework version to netstandard 2.0. net 46 is required for functioning of web sockets
mentat9 pushed a commit to mentat9/azure-sdk-for-net that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2019
Updating client version to 2.0 since we have a breaking change (Interface changes in IMessageReceiver)
Bumping up dotnet framework version to netstandard 2.0. net 46 is required for functioning of web sockets
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants