Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Experiment] Protocol methods on HLC experiment - Serialization #27022

Closed

Conversation

annelo-msft
Copy link
Member

Initial prototyping work toward #26941

@ghost ghost added the Storage Storage Service (Queues, Blobs, Files) label Feb 15, 2022
@annelo-msft annelo-msft changed the title Protocol methods on HLC experiment - Serialization [Experiment] Protocol methods on HLC experiment - Serialization Mar 30, 2022
@ghost ghost added the no-recent-activity There has been no recent activity on this issue. label Jun 3, 2022
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 3, 2022

Hi @annelo-msft. Thank you for your interest in helping to improve the Azure SDK experience and for your contribution. We've noticed that there hasn't been recent engagement on this pull request. If this is still an active work stream, please let us know by pushing some changes or leaving a comment. Otherwise, we'll close this out in 7 days.

@ghost ghost closed this Jun 10, 2022
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 10, 2022

Hi @annelo-msft. Thank you for your contribution. Since there hasn't been recent engagement, we're going to close this out. Feel free to respond with a comment containing "/reopen" if you'd like to continue working on these changes. Please be sure to use the command to reopen or remove the "no-recent-activity" label; otherwise, this is likely to be closed again with the next cleanup pass.

This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Do Not Merge no-recent-activity There has been no recent activity on this issue. Storage Storage Service (Queues, Blobs, Files)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant