Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: jsonfmt sql #6567

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 15, 2019
Merged

chore: jsonfmt sql #6567

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 15, 2019

Conversation

nschonni
Copy link
Contributor

@nschonni nschonni commented Jul 9, 2019

No description provided.

@nschonni nschonni requested a review from jaredmoo as a code owner July 9, 2019 03:43
@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Jul 9, 2019

SDK Automation [Logs] (Generated from 52fb8b9)

Succeeded Python: Azure/azure-sdk-for-python [Logs] [Diff]
Failed Java: Azure/azure-sdk-for-java [Logs] [Diff]
Failed Go: Azure/azure-sdk-for-go [Logs]
  • No packages generated.
Succeeded JavaScript: Azure/azure-sdk-for-js [Logs] [Diff]
Failed Ruby: Azure/azure-sdk-for-ruby [Logs] [Diff]

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jul 9, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-python

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jul 9, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-go

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jul 9, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-java

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-java#3004

@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@yungezz yungezz merged commit 9d9ee63 into Azure:master Jul 15, 2019
@nschonni nschonni deleted the chore--jsonfmt-sql branch July 15, 2019 20:24
celikcigdem pushed a commit to celikcigdem/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants