Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add new API version 2019-07-01 for SIG swagger spec #6400

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Jul 17, 2019

Conversation

jerryc3
Copy link
Contributor

@jerryc3 jerryc3 commented Jun 20, 2019

Latest improvements:

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Contribution checklist:

  • I have reviewed the documentation for the workflow.
  • Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and have all been fixed in this PR.
  • The OpenAPI Hub was used for checking validation status and next steps.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Service team MUST add the "WaitForARMFeedback" label if the management plane API changes fall into one of the below categories.
  • adding/removing APIs.
  • adding/removing properties.
  • adding/removing API-version.
  • adding a new service in Azure.

Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged urgently, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
    Please follow the link to find more details on API review process.

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Jun 20, 2019

SDK Automation [Logs] (Generated from 46c41c8, Iteration 8)

Succeeded Python: Azure/azure-sdk-for-python [Logs] [Diff]
Failed Java: Azure/azure-sdk-for-java [Logs] [Diff]
Failed JavaScript: Azure/azure-sdk-for-js [Logs]
  • No packages generated.
Failed Go: Azure/azure-sdk-for-go [Logs]
  • No packages generated.
Failed Ruby: Azure/azure-sdk-for-ruby [Logs] [Diff]

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jun 20, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-ruby

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-ruby

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jun 20, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#5853

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jun 20, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

A PR has been created for you based on this PR content.

Once this PR will be merged, content will be added to your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-go#5283

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jun 20, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-java

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-java

@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@jhendrixMSFT
Copy link
Member

@AutorestCI regenerate azure-sdk-for-go

@ravbhatnagar ravbhatnagar added ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review and removed WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Jun 26, 2019
@ravbhatnagar
Copy link
Contributor

Two properties changed to writable from readonly. Signing off from ARM side.

@jerryc3 jerryc3 changed the title [DO NOT MERGE] Add new API version 2019-07-01 for SIG swagger spec Add new API version 2019-07-01 for SIG swagger spec Jul 1, 2019
@vanbasten2323
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

@jhendrixMSFT
Copy link
Member

@jerryc3 this looks good from SDK perspective. Does anybody else need to review/sign off?

@jerryc3
Copy link
Contributor Author

jerryc3 commented Jul 3, 2019

@jerryc3 this looks good from SDK perspective. Does anybody else need to review/sign off?

Hi Joel, Thanks for the review! The code owners Pengfei/Hyonho still need to take a look. I also got informed yesterday that my team is trying to add another small field. I think it would be better to add it to this PR so SDK team only has to regenerate once - I will update this PR as soon as it is ready.

@vanbasten23
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

@jhendrixMSFT
Copy link
Member

@jerryc3 is this ready now?

@jerryc3
Copy link
Contributor Author

jerryc3 commented Jul 17, 2019

@jerryc3 is this ready now?

This is ready! I have asked Hyonho to look at it and then we can merge as soon as he signs off.

@hyonholee
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM. Thanks.

@jerryc3
Copy link
Contributor Author

jerryc3 commented Jul 17, 2019

@jhendrixMSFT Got all required approvals. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants