Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Do Not Merge] Kusto: Add support for attached databases #5933

Closed
wants to merge 9 commits into from

Conversation

radennis
Copy link
Contributor

Latest improvements:

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Contribution checklist:

  • I have reviewed the documentation for the workflow.
  • Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and have all been fixed in this PR.
  • The OpenAPI Hub was used for checking validation status and next steps.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Service team MUST add the "WaitForARMFeedback" label if the management plane API changes fall into one of the below categories.
  • adding/removing APIs.
  • adding/removing properties.
  • adding/removing API-version.
  • adding a new service in Azure.

Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged urgently, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
    Please follow the link to find more details on API review process.

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented May 13, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-js

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-js

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented May 13, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-ruby

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-ruby

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented May 13, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

A PR has been created for you:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#5707

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented May 13, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-java

Encountered a Subprocess error: (azure-sdk-for-java)

Command: ['/usr/local/bin/autorest', '/tmp/tmp10y_6e82/rest/specification/azure-kusto/resource-manager/readme.md', '--perform-load=false', '--swagger-to-sdk', '--output-artifact=configuration.json', '--input-file=foo', '--output-folder=/tmp/tmppmi50a2b']
Finished with return code 7
and output:

AutoRest code generation utility [version: 2.0.4283; node: v8.12.0]
(C) 2018 Microsoft Corporation.
https://aka.ms/autorest
Failure:
Error: Unable to start AutoRest Core from /root/.autorest/@microsoft.azure_autorest-core@2.0.4373/node_modules/@microsoft.azure/autorest-core
Error: Unable to start AutoRest Core from /root/.autorest/@microsoft.azure_autorest-core@2.0.4373/node_modules/@microsoft.azure/autorest-core
    at main (/opt/node_modules/autorest/dist/app.js:232:19)
    at <anonymous>

/root/.autorest/@microsoft.azure_autorest-core@2.0.4373/node_modules/@microsoft.azure/autorest-core/dist/app.js:33
    autorest_core_1.Shutdown();
    ^
ReferenceError: autorest_core_1 is not defined
    at process.on (/root/.autorest/@microsoft.azure_autorest-core@2.0.4373/node_modules/@microsoft.azure/autorest-core/dist/app.js:33:5)
    at emitOne (events.js:121:20)
    at process.emit (events.js:211:7)
    at process.emit (/node_modules/source-map-support/source-map-support.js:439:21)
fs.js:612
  return binding.close(fd);
                 ^

Error: EBADF: bad file descriptor, close
    at Object.fs.closeSync (fs.js:612:18)
    at StaticVolumeFile.shutdown (/opt/node_modules/autorest/dist/static-loader.js:352:10)
    at StaticFilesystem.shutdown (/opt/node_modules/autorest/dist/static-loader.js:406:17)
    at process.exit.n [as exit] (/opt/node_modules/autorest/dist/static-loader.js:169:11)
    at printErrorAndExit (/node_modules/source-map-support/source-map-support.js:423:11)
    at process.emit (/node_modules/source-map-support/source-map-support.js:435:16)
    at process._fatalException (bootstrap_node.js:391:26)

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented May 13, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

A PR has been created for you:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-go#4785

@radennis radennis changed the title Kusto: Add support for attached databases [Do Not Merge] Kusto: Add support for attached databases May 13, 2019
@azuresdkci azuresdkci requested a review from kpajdzik May 13, 2019 12:23
@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

adxsdknet added a commit to adxsdknet/azure-sdk-for-net that referenced this pull request May 13, 2019
REST Spec PR 'Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#5933'
REST Spec PR Author 'radennis'
REST Spec PR Last commit
@adxsdknet
Copy link

adxsdknet commented May 13, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-net

A PR has been created for you:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-net#6253
.NET SDK Commits:
adxsdknet/azure-sdk-for-net@552d689
adxsdknet/azure-sdk-for-net@028c2df
adxsdknet/azure-sdk-for-net@6bdd102

adxsdknet added a commit to adxsdknet/azure-sdk-for-net that referenced this pull request May 14, 2019
REST Spec PR 'Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#5933'
REST Spec PR Author 'radennis'
REST Spec PR Last commit
@radennis
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kpajdzik do you have any other comments or can approve?

@kpajdzik
Copy link
Contributor

@kpajdzik do you have any other comments or can approve?

Could you resolve the merge conflicts? I'll merge after the resolution.

@radennis
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @kpajdzik. Please do not merge yet. The CR is here to make sure it is approved by the SDK and ARM folks before going forward. Thanks!

adxsdknet added a commit to adxsdknet/azure-sdk-for-net that referenced this pull request May 20, 2019
REST Spec PR 'Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#5933'
REST Spec PR Author 'radennis'
REST Spec PR Last commit
@kpajdzik kpajdzik added the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label May 20, 2019
@kpajdzik
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @kpajdzik. Please do not merge yet. The CR is here to make sure it is approved by the SDK and ARM folks before going forward. Thanks!

I'm adding ARM team if you need their review. I believe I'm one of the "SDK folks" so we have this checked :)

@radennis
Copy link
Contributor Author

That's great, thanks @kpajdzik. Regarding ARM, would appreciate @KrisBash's approval since he attended the design review.

@sanjaiganesh
Copy link
Contributor

KrishBash is ARM reviewer next week. I would defer to Krish this as Ravit suggested.

@radennis
Copy link
Contributor Author

radennis commented Jun 4, 2019

@KrisBash could you please take a look and approve per our design? Just to make it clear, we're not looking into pushing this change now. Just getting your approval, so that once the feature is complete we can add it to the swagger.

Copy link
Contributor

@KrisBash KrisBash left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for working closely with us on this one. - it looks as expected. I had a few questions in my comments.

@KrisBash KrisBash added ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review and removed ARMReviewInProgress labels Jun 6, 2019
@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Jun 6, 2019

SDK Automation [Logs] (Generated from 48f2ed9)

Pending Python: Azure/azure-sdk-for-python
  • Package generation pending.
Pending Go: Azure/azure-sdk-for-go
  • Package generation pending.
Pending Java: Azure/azure-sdk-for-java
  • Package generation pending.

Copy link
Contributor

@KrisBash KrisBash left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@KrisBash KrisBash added ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review and removed ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Jun 6, 2019
@radennis
Copy link
Contributor Author

radennis commented Jun 10, 2019

Thanks @KrisBash !
Closing the PR for until we want to push it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants