Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[AKS] update go SDK configuration and fix a consistency error #3172

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 12, 2018

Conversation

mboersma
Copy link
Member

@mboersma mboersma commented Jun 1, 2018

#3131 forgot to update readme.md for the Go multi-api SDK. This does that and updates some older description fields so they pass the new, more strict model linting.

PR information

  • The title of the PR is clear and informative.
  • There are a small number of commits, each of which have an informative message. This means that previously merged commits do not appear in the history of the PR. For information on cleaning up the commits in your pull request, see this page.
  • Except for special cases involving multiple contributors, the PR is started from a fork of the main repository, not a branch.
  • If applicable, the PR references the bug/issue that it fixes.
  • Swagger files are correctly named (e.g. the api-version in the path should match the api-version in the spec).

Quality of Swagger

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jun 1, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-python

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jun 1, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-node

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-node

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jun 1, 2018

Automation for azure-libraries-for-java

Nothing to generate for azure-libraries-for-java

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jun 1, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-ruby

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-ruby

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jun 1, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-go#2022

@mboersma
Copy link
Member Author

mboersma commented Jun 1, 2018

Looks like npm itself has a security issue with a package it wants to install, and I may need to do more to sync up the models since that validation step failed now.

@annatisch
Copy link
Member

annatisch commented Jun 8, 2018

@mboersma - This seems to be the last CI error - could you take a look?

INFO:swaggertosdk.autorest_tools:FATAL: Error: '$.definitions.OrchestratorProfile.required' has incompatible values (---
INFO:swaggertosdk.autorest_tools:- orchestratorType
INFO:swaggertosdk.autorest_tools:- orchestratorVersion
INFO:swaggertosdk.autorest_tools:, ---
INFO:swaggertosdk.autorest_tools:- orchestratorVersion
INFO:swaggertosdk.autorest_tools:).

It looks like it's just a mismatch between OrchestratorProfile in location.json vs managedClusters.json.

@mboersma mboersma force-pushed the update-aks-go-sdk branch from 5b364d9 to eebe190 Compare June 11, 2018 16:35
@annatisch
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the fix @mboersma.
There's still a couple of linter ARMViolations:

  • "Property named: 'enableRBAC', for definition: 'ManagedClusterProperties' must follow camelCase style. Example: 'enableRbac'."
  • "Tracked resource 'ContainerService' must have patch operation that at least supports the update of tags. It's strongly recommended that the PATCH operation supports update of all mutable properties as well."
  • "Tracked resource 'ManagedCluster' must have patch operation that at least supports the update of tags. It's strongly recommended that the PATCH operation supports update of all mutable properties as well."

Given that these errors are not caused by the commits in this PR, I wont block merging because of them - but wondering if it's possible to get these fixed or (if the service is already live) to apply for ARM violation suppression so we can get the CI green?

@mboersma
Copy link
Member Author

wondering if it's possible to get these fixed or (if the service is already live) to apply for ARM violation suppression so we can get the CI green?

Thanks @annatisch! Yes, our intent is to suppress those three known violations for now as AKS is already live. We've communicated with @ravbhatnagar and have a plan to implement the PATCH endpoint for Managed Clusters.

@annatisch annatisch merged commit da72ddb into Azure:master Jun 12, 2018
@mboersma mboersma deleted the update-aks-go-sdk branch June 12, 2018 18:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants