Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Avoid Partial Pattern Matches #24081

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 30, 2023
Merged

Avoid Partial Pattern Matches #24081

merged 2 commits into from
May 30, 2023

Conversation

malpaniHMC
Copy link
Contributor

ARM API Information (Control Plane)

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
  4. By default, Azure SDKs of all languages (.NET/Python/Java/JavaScript for both management-plane SDK and data-plane SDK, Go for management-plane SDK only ) MUST be refreshed with/after swagger of new version is published. If you prefer NOT to refresh any specific SDK language upon swagger updates in the current PR, please leave details with justification here.

Contribution checklist (MS Employees Only):

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
      -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. For more details refer to the wiki. Note that this doesn't apply if you are trying to merge a PR that was previously in the private repository.
  • Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If you have any breaking changes as defined in the Breaking Change Policy, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board.

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Additional details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking Change Wiki.

NOTE: To update API(s) in public preview for over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @malpaniHMC Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vscswagger@microsoft.com

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented May 19, 2023

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️❌BreakingChange: 22 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
    compared swaggers (via Oad v0.10.4)] new version base version
    TrafficController.json 2023-05-01-preview(cd1cdc7) 2023-05-01-preview(main)
    Rule Message
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L190:11
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L190:11
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L235:11
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L235:11
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L306:11
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L306:11
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L360:11
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L360:11
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L425:11
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L425:11
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L475:11
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L475:11
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L483:11
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L483:11
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L528:11
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L528:11
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L536:11
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L536:11
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L607:11
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L607:11
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L615:11
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L615:11
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L669:11
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L669:11
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L677:11
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L677:11
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L742:11
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L742:11
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L792:11
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L792:11
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L800:11
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L800:11
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L845:11
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L845:11
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L853:11
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L853:11
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L924:11
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L924:11
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L932:11
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L932:11
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L986:11
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L986:11
    1036 - ConstraintChanged The new version has a different 'pattern' value than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L994:11
    Old: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L994:11
    ️️✔️Breaking Change(Cross-Version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There is no credential detected.
    ️⚠️LintDiff: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]
    compared tags (via openapi-validator v2.1.2) new version base version
    package-2023-05-01-preview package-2023-05-01-preview(cd1cdc7) package-2023-05-01-preview(main)

    The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

    Rule Message
    PutResponseSchemaDescription Description of 200 response code of a PUT operation MUST include term 'update'.
    Location: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L253
    PutResponseSchemaDescription Description of 200 response code of a PUT operation MUST include term 'update'.
    Location: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L554
    PutResponseSchemaDescription Description of 200 response code of a PUT operation MUST include term 'update'.
    Location: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L871
    ⚠️ ProvisioningStateSpecifiedForLRODelete 200 response schema in long running DELETE operation is missing ProvisioningState property. A LRO DELETE operations 200 response schema must have ProvisioningState specified.
    Location: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L370
    ⚠️ ProvisioningStateSpecifiedForLRODelete 200 response schema in long running DELETE operation is missing ProvisioningState property. A LRO DELETE operations 200 response schema must have ProvisioningState specified.
    Location: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L687
    ⚠️ ProvisioningStateSpecifiedForLRODelete 200 response schema in long running DELETE operation is missing ProvisioningState property. A LRO DELETE operations 200 response schema must have ProvisioningState specified.
    Location: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L1004
    ⚠️ SchemaDescriptionOrTitle Schema should have a description or title.
    Location: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L1132
    ⚠️ SchemaDescriptionOrTitle Schema should have a description or title.
    Location: Microsoft.ServiceNetworking/preview/2023-05-01-preview/TrafficController.json#L1247
    ️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Avocado.
    ️️✔️ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️⚠️~[Staging] ServiceAPIReadinessTest: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]

    API Test is not triggered due to precheck failure. Check pipeline log for details.

    ️️✔️SwaggerAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️CadlAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️TypeSpecAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passed for PoliCheck.
    ️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    ️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
    ️️✔️CadlValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for CadlValidation.
    ️️✔️TypeSpec Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for TypeSpec Validation.
    ️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Summary.
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented May 19, 2023

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
     Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account. 
    ️️✔️SDK Breaking Change Tracking succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

    Breaking Changes Tracking



    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 5d9660b. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
      command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh]
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice New minor version of npm available! 9.5.1 -> 9.6.7
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Changelog: <https://github.com/npm/cli/releases/tag/v9.6.7>
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Run `npm install -g npm@9.6.7` to update!
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice
    • ️✔️track2_azure-mgmt-servicenetworking [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog]
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 5d9660b. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./eng/scripts/automation_init.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	generator automation-v2 ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️sdk/resourcemanager/servicenetworking/armservicenetworking [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] ### Other Changes
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] Total 0 breaking change(s), 0 additive change(s).
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented May 19, 2023

    Generated ApiView

    Language Package Name ApiView Link
    Go sdk/resourcemanager/servicenetworking/armservicenetworking https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/b790bf2517394184b6126daf71aece26

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @malpaniHMC, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review.
    Action: To initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
    If you want to know the production traffic statistic, please see ARM Traffic statistic.
    If you think it is false positive breaking change, please provide the reasons in the PR comment, report to Swagger Tooling Team via https://aka.ms/swaggerfeedback.
    Note: To avoid breaking change, you can refer to Shift Left Solution for detecting breaking change in early phase at your service code repository.

    @JackTn
    Copy link
    Member

    JackTn commented May 22, 2023

    @malpaniHMC can you fix or explain the breaking change that why cause ConstraintChanged happend

    @JackTn
    Copy link
    Member

    JackTn commented May 22, 2023

    @msyyc @tadelesh help to approve sdk-breaking-for python/go , Thanks

    @malpaniHMC
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    malpaniHMC commented May 22, 2023

    Hi @JackTn, our service is still in the private preview stage and the breaking change is not a problem for us at the moment. We realized that we wanted our service to accept a more limited range of inputs for resource names.

    @tadelesh tadelesh added the Approved-SdkBreakingChange-Go Approve the breaking change tracking for azure-sdk-for-go label May 23, 2023
    @JackTn
    Copy link
    Member

    JackTn commented May 23, 2023

    @malpaniHMC

    Hi @JackTn, our service is still in the private preview stage and the breaking change is not a problem for us at the moment. We realized that we wanted our service to accept a more limited range of inputs for resource names.

    @JeffreyRichter can you approve this breaking change ?

    @JeffreyRichter JeffreyRichter added the Approved-BreakingChange DO NOT USE! OBSOLETE label. See https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/issues/6374 label May 23, 2023
    @msyyc
    Copy link
    Member

    msyyc commented May 24, 2023

    /azp run

    @azure-pipelines
    Copy link

    Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

    @JackTn
    Copy link
    Member

    JackTn commented May 25, 2023

    @malpaniHMC pls resolve conflicts and do you need to merge this pr now ?

    @tadelesh tadelesh removed CI-BreakingChange-Go Approved-SdkBreakingChange-Go Approve the breaking change tracking for azure-sdk-for-go labels May 25, 2023
    @malpaniHMC
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    @JackTn I have resolved the merge conflicts. Yes, I would like the PR to be merged now.

    @openapi-pipeline-app openapi-pipeline-app bot added Approved-SdkBreakingChange-Go Approve the breaking change tracking for azure-sdk-for-go CI-BreakingChange-Go labels May 25, 2023
    @JackTn
    Copy link
    Member

    JackTn commented May 26, 2023

    @JackTn I have resolved the merge conflicts. Yes, I would like the PR to be merged now.

    @msyyc take a look on this pr and help to merge it, Thanks

    @JackTn JackTn added the Approved-OkToMerge <valid label in PR review process>add this label when assignee approve to merge the updates label May 26, 2023
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    Approved-BreakingChange DO NOT USE! OBSOLETE label. See https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/issues/6374 Approved-OkToMerge <valid label in PR review process>add this label when assignee approve to merge the updates Approved-SdkBreakingChange-Go Approve the breaking change tracking for azure-sdk-for-go Approved-SdkBreakingChange-Python BreakingChangeReviewRequired <valid label in PR review process>add this label when breaking change review is required CI-BreakingChange-Go resource-manager
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    6 participants