-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.ContainerInstance to add version preview/2023-02-01-preview #23221
Conversation
…e/2022-09-01 to version 2023-02-01-preview
Hi, @MicroJamesLim Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips. Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vscswagger@microsoft.com |
Swagger Validation Report
|
compared swaggers (via Oad v0.10.4)] | new version | base version |
---|---|---|
containerInstance.json | 2023-02-01-preview(2f2f786) | 2022-09-01(main) |
containerInstance.json | 2023-02-01-preview(2f2f786) | 2022-10-01-preview(main) |
The following breaking changes are detected by comparison with the latest preview version:
️️✔️
CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
️⚠️
LintDiff: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]
compared tags (via openapi-validator v2.0.0) | new version | base version |
---|---|---|
package-preview-2023-02 | package-preview-2023-02(2f2f786) | default(main) |
The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:
Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.
️️✔️
Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️
ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️❌
~[Staging] ServiceAPIReadinessTest: 1 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
Rule | Message |
---|---|
Error |
"\nfatal error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, open '/mnt/vss/_work/1/azure-rest-api-specs/specification/containerinstance/resource-manager/Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2023-02-01-preview/scenarios/basic.yaml', "errno":-2, "code":"ENOENT", "syscall":"open", "path":"/mnt/vss/_work/1/azure-rest-api-specs/specification/containerinstance/resource-manager/Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2023-02-01-preview/scenarios/basic.yaml"\n" |
️️✔️
SwaggerAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️
CadlAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️
ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️
SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️
PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passed for PoliCheck.
️️✔️
PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
️️✔️
SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️
Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
️️✔️
CadlValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for CadlValidation.
️️✔️
TypeSpec Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for TypeSpec Validation.
️️✔️
PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Summary.
Swagger Generation Artifacts
|
Generated ApiView
|
/azp run unifiedPipeline |
No pipelines are associated with this pull request. |
/azp run unifiedPipeline |
No pipelines are associated with this pull request. |
/azp run unifiedPipeline |
No pipelines are associated with this pull request. |
/azp run unifiedPipeline |
No pipelines are associated with this pull request. |
Hi @MicroJamesLim, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of
|
/azp run unifiedPipeline |
No pipelines are associated with this pull request. |
/azp run unifiedPipeline |
No pipelines are associated with this pull request. |
approved for python breaking |
/azp run unifiedPipeline |
No pipelines are associated with this pull request. |
], | ||
"x-ms-enum": { | ||
"name": "IsCustomProvisioningTimeout", | ||
"modelAsString": true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have already set modelAsString to true in the previous commit. Also the documentation indicates that it's set to true as default.
… version preview/2023-02-01-preview (Azure#23221) * Adds base for updating Microsoft.ContainerInstance from version stable/2022-09-01 to version 2023-02-01-preview * Updates readme * Updates API version in new specs and examples * added property * added sample request and responses * integer format * read only property * read only fix * custom word * changed boolean to enum * changed boolean to enum in examples * x-ms-enum
This is a PR generated at OpenAPI Hub. You can view your work branch via this link.
ARM API Information (Control Plane)
Azure 1st Party Service can try out the Shift Left experience to initiate API design review from ADO code repo. If you are interested, may request engineering support by filling in with the form https://aka.ms/ShiftLeftSupportForm.
Changelog
Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:
Contribution checklist (MS Employees Only):
If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.
ARM API Review Checklist
Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:
Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.
-[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. For more details refer to the wiki.
Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
Breaking Change Review Checklist
If you have any breaking changes as defined in the Breaking Change Policy, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board.
Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Additional details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking Change Wiki.
NOTE: To update API(s) in public preview for over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)
Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.