Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add default value 10 for top in ListMultivariateModels #22773

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

minkefusiji
Copy link
Member

@minkefusiji minkefusiji commented Feb 23, 2023

Data Plane API - Pull Request

API Info: The Basics

Most of the information about your service should be captured in the issue that serves as your engagement record.

  • Link to engagement record issue:

Is this review for (select one):

  • a private preview
  • a public preview
  • GA release

Change Scope

This section will help us focus on the specific parts of your API that are new or have been modified.
Please share a link to the design document for the new APIs, a link to the previous Open API document (swagger) if applicable, and the root paths that have been updated.

  • Design Document:
  • Previous Open API Doc:
  • Updated paths:

❔Got questions? Need additional info?? We are here to help!

Contact us!

The Azure API Review Board is dedicated to helping you create amazing APIs. You can read about our mission and learn more about our process on our wiki.

Click here for links to tools, specs, guidelines & other good stuff

Tooling

Guidelines & Specifications

Helpful Links

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @minkefusiji Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vscswagger@microsoft.com

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Feb 23, 2023

    Swagger pipeline can not start as the pull request has merge conflicts.

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Feb 23, 2023

    Swagger pipeline can not start as the pull request has merge conflicts.

    @ghost ghost added the Cognitive Services label Feb 23, 2023
    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Feb 23, 2023

    Swagger pipeline restarted successfully. If there is ApiView generated, it will be updated in this comment.

    @AzureRestAPISpecReview AzureRestAPISpecReview added the Cadl Authored with Cadl label Feb 23, 2023
    Copy link
    Member

    @mikekistler mikekistler left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    The change to the Cadl looks good but you should regenerate the OpenAPI and include it in this PR so everything stays in sync.

    @AzureRestAPISpecReview AzureRestAPISpecReview added BreakingChangeReviewRequired <valid label in PR review process>add this label when breaking change review is required CI-FixRequiredOnFailure data-plane labels Mar 1, 2023
    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @minkefusiji, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review.
    Action: To initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
    If you want to know the production traffic statistic, please see ARM Traffic statistic.
    If you think it is false positive breaking change, please provide the reasons in the PR comment, report to Swagger Tooling Team via https://aka.ms/swaggerfeedback.
    Note: To avoid breaking change, you can refer to Shift Left Solution for detecting breaking change in early phase at your service code repository.

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @minkefusiji, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of Avocado, semantic validation, model validation, breaking change, lintDiff. If you have any questions, please post your questions in this channel https://aka.ms/swaggersupport.

    TaskHow to fixPriority
    AvocadoFix-AvocadoHigh
    Semantic validationFix-SemanticValidation-ErrorHigh
    Model validationFix-ModelValidation-ErrorHigh
    LintDiffFix-LintDiffhigh
    If you need further help, please feedback via swagger feedback.

    @minkefusiji
    Copy link
    Member Author

    The change to the Cadl looks good but you should regenerate the OpenAPI and include it in this PR so everything stays in sync.

    OpenAPI regenerated.

    @mikekistler
    Copy link
    Member

    There is another small issue I am working to resolve -- prior changes to the Cadl that did not update the OpenAPI. Hoping to get those resolved today.

    @ghost
    Copy link

    ghost commented Mar 19, 2023

    Hi, @minkefusiji. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

    @ghost ghost added the no-recent-activity label Mar 19, 2023
    @mikeharder
    Copy link
    Member

    /azp run

    @azure-pipelines
    Copy link

    Pull request contains merge conflicts.

    @ghost ghost removed the no-recent-activity label Mar 20, 2023
    @mikekistler
    Copy link
    Member

    I think this PR can be closed. I have included the important changes in #23434.

    @ghost
    Copy link

    ghost commented Apr 30, 2023

    Hi, @minkefusiji. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

    @ghost ghost added the no-recent-activity label Apr 30, 2023
    @ghost ghost closed this May 15, 2023
    @ghost
    Copy link

    ghost commented May 15, 2023

    Hi, @minkefusiji. The PR will be closed since the PR has no update for 28 days. If you still need the PR review to proceed, please reopen it and @ mention PR assignee.

    This pull request was closed.
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    BreakingChangeReviewRequired <valid label in PR review process>add this label when breaking change review is required Cadl Authored with Cadl CI-FixRequiredOnFailure Cognitive Services data-plane
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    6 participants