Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.ContainerInstance to add version stable/2022-09-01 #21158

Conversation

fnuarnav
Copy link
Contributor

@fnuarnav fnuarnav commented Oct 17, 2022

This is a PR generated at OpenAPI Hub. You can view your work branch via this link.

ARM API Information (Control Plane)

Azure 1st Party Service can try out the Shift Left experience to initiate API design review from ADO code repo. If you are interested, may request engineering support by filling in with the form https://aka.ms/ShiftLeftSupportForm.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
  4. By default, Azure SDKs of all languages (.NET/Python/Java/JavaScript for both management-plane SDK and data-plane SDK, Go for management-plane SDK only ) MUST be refreshed with/after swagger of new version is published. If you prefer NOT to refresh any specific SDK language upon swagger updates in the current PR, please leave details with justification here.

Contribution checklist (MS Employees Only):

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
      -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. For more details refer to the wiki.
  • Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If you have any breaking changes as defined in the Breaking Change Policy, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board.

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Additional details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking Change Wiki.

NOTE: To update API(s) in public preview for over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @fnuarnav Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vscswagger@microsoft.com

    @ghost ghost added the Container Instances label Oct 17, 2022
    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Oct 17, 2022

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️⚠️Breaking Change(Cross-Version): 50 Warnings warning [Detail]
    compared swaggers (via Oad v0.10.1)] new version base version
    containerInstance.json 2022-09-01(2d35226) 2021-10-01(main)
    containerInstance.json 2022-09-01(2d35226) 2018-02-01-preview(main)

    The following breaking changes are detected by comparison with the latest preview version:

    Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

    Rule Message
    ⚠️ 1008 - ModifiedOperationId The operation id has been changed from 'ContainerGroupUsage_List' to 'Location_ListUsage'. This will impact generated code.
    New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L461:7
    Old: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2018-02-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L290:7
    ⚠️ 1008 - ModifiedOperationId The operation id has been changed from 'ContainerLogs_List' to 'Containers_ListLogs'. This will impact generated code.
    New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L500:7
    Old: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2018-02-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L320:7
    ⚠️ 1008 - ModifiedOperationId The operation id has been changed from 'StartContainer_LaunchExec' to 'Containers_ExecuteCommand'. This will impact generated code.
    New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L560:7
    Old: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2018-02-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L367:7
    ⚠️ 1011 - AddingResponseCode The new version adds a response code 'default'.
    New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L61:11
    ⚠️ 1011 - AddingResponseCode The new version adds a response code 'default'.
    New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L101:11
    ⚠️ 1011 - AddingResponseCode The new version adds a response code 'default'.
    New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L147:11
    ⚠️ 1011 - AddingResponseCode The new version adds a response code 'default'.
    New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L206:11
    ⚠️ 1011 - AddingResponseCode The new version adds a response code 'default'.
    New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L254:11
    ⚠️ 1011 - AddingResponseCode The new version adds a response code '202'.
    New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L292:11
    ⚠️ 1011 - AddingResponseCode The new version adds a response code 'default'.
    New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L298:11
    ⚠️ 1011 - AddingResponseCode The new version adds a response code 'default'.
    New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L448:11
    ⚠️ 1011 - AddingResponseCode The new version adds a response code 'default'.
    New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L487:11
    ⚠️ 1011 - AddingResponseCode The new version adds a response code 'default'.
    New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L550:11
    ⚠️ 1011 - AddingResponseCode The new version adds a response code 'default'.
    New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L606:11
    ⚠️ 1023 - TypeFormatChanged The new version has a different format than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L890:13
    Old: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2018-02-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L475:13
    ⚠️ 1023 - TypeFormatChanged The new version has a different format than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L960:9
    Old: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2018-02-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L526:9
    ⚠️ 1023 - TypeFormatChanged The new version has a different format than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L984:9
    Old: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2018-02-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L545:9
    ⚠️ 1023 - TypeFormatChanged The new version has a different format than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L1907:9
    Old: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2018-02-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L1056:9
    ⚠️ 1023 - TypeFormatChanged The new version has a different format than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L1913:9
    Old: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2018-02-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L1061:9
    ⚠️ 1023 - TypeFormatChanged The new version has a different format than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L529:11
    Old: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2018-02-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L349:11
    ⚠️ 1023 - TypeFormatChanged The new version has a different format than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L1977:13
    Old: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2018-02-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L1124:13
    ⚠️ 1023 - TypeFormatChanged The new version has a different format than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L1982:13
    Old: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2018-02-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L1128:13
    ⚠️ 1025 - RequiredStatusChange The 'required' status changed from the old version('False') to the new version('True').
    New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L1784:7
    Old: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2018-02-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L954:7
    ⚠️ 1025 - RequiredStatusChange The 'required' status changed from the old version('False') to the new version('True').
    New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L1571:7
    Old: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2018-02-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L839:7
    ⚠️ 1029 - ReadonlyPropertyChanged The read only property has changed from 'false' to 'true'.
    New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L896:13
    Old: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2018-02-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L480:13
    ⚠️ 1029 - ReadonlyPropertyChanged The read only property has changed from 'false' to 'true'.
    New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L949:9
    Old: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2018-02-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L517:9
    ⚠️ 1029 - ReadonlyPropertyChanged The read only property has changed from 'false' to 'true'.
    New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L954:9
    Old: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2018-02-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L521:9
    ⚠️ 1029 - ReadonlyPropertyChanged The read only property has changed from 'false' to 'true'.
    New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L960:9
    Old: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2018-02-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L526:9
    ⚠️ 1029 - ReadonlyPropertyChanged The read only property has changed from 'false' to 'true'.
    New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L966:9
    Old: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2018-02-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L530:9
    ⚠️ 1029 - ReadonlyPropertyChanged The read only property has changed from 'false' to 'true'.
    New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L972:9
    Old: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2018-02-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L535:9
    ️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There is no credential detected.
    ️⚠️LintDiff: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]
    compared tags (via openapi-validator v1.13.0) new version base version
    package-2022-09 package-2022-09(2d35226) default(main)

    The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

    Rule Message
    R4018 - OperationsApiResponseSchema The response schema of operations API '/providers/Microsoft.ContainerInstance/operations' does not match the ARM specification. Please standardize the schema.
    Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L424
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'GitRepoVolume' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L1146
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ContainerGroupIdentity' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L1515
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'CloudError' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L2341
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'CloudErrorBody' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L2350
    ⚠️ R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: timestamps
    Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L537
    ⚠️ R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: readOnly
    Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L1120
    ⚠️ R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: readOnly
    Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L1211
    ⚠️ R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData The response of operation:'ContainerGroups_Get' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response.
    Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L114
    ⚠️ R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData The response of operation:'ContainerGroups_CreateOrUpdate' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response.
    Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L155
    ⚠️ R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData The response of operation:'ContainerGroups_Update' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response.
    Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2022-09-01/containerInstance.json#L215
    ️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Avocado.
    ️️✔️ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️⚠️~[Staging] ServiceAPIReadinessTest: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]

    API Test is not triggered due to precheck failure. Check pipeline log for details.

    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passed for PoliCheck.
    ️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    ️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
    ️️✔️CadlValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for CadlValidation.
    ️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Summary.
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Oct 17, 2022

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
     Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account. 
    ️❌SDK Breaking Change Tracking failed [Detail]

    Breaking Changes Tracking

    azure-sdk-for-go - sdk/resourcemanager/containerinstance/armcontainerinstance - 3.0.0
    +	Struct `CloudErrorBody` has been removed
    +	Struct `CloudError` has been removed


    ️❌ azure-sdk-for-net-track2 failed [Detail]
    • Failed [Logs]Release - Generate from 7685d4c. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Automation-Sdk-Init.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initOutput.json
      warn	File azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[91mGeneratePackage: �[0m/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/eng/scripts/automation/GenerateAndBuildLib.ps1:611
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[96mLine |
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[96m 611 | �[0m         �[96mGeneratePackage -projectFolder $projectFolder -sdkRootPath $s�[0m …
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[96m     | �[91m         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[91m�[96m     | �[91mFailed to build sdk. exit code: False
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[0m
    • Azure.ResourceManager.ContainerInstance [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes] Breaking Change Detected
      info	[Changelog] Breaking Changes: /home/cloudtest/.nuget/packages/microsoft.dotnet.apicompat/5.0.0-beta.20467.1/build/Microsoft.DotNet.ApiCompat.targets(82,5): error : MembersMustExist : Member 'public System.Nullable<Azure.ResourceManager.ContainerInstance.Models.AutoGeneratedDomainNameLabelScope> Azure.ResourceManager.ContainerInstance.Models.ContainerGroupIPAddress.DnsNameLabelReusePolicy.get()' does not exist in the implementation but it does exist in the contract. [/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/containerinstance/Azure.ResourceManager.ContainerInstance/src/Azure.ResourceManager.ContainerInstance.csproj],
      info	[Changelog] /home/cloudtest/.nuget/packages/microsoft.dotnet.apicompat/5.0.0-beta.20467.1/build/Microsoft.DotNet.ApiCompat.targets(82,5): error : MembersMustExist : Member 'public void Azure.ResourceManager.ContainerInstance.Models.ContainerGroupIPAddress.DnsNameLabelReusePolicy.set(System.Nullable<Azure.ResourceManager.ContainerInstance.Models.AutoGeneratedDomainNameLabelScope>)' does not exist in the implementation but it does exist in the contract. [/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/containerinstance/Azure.ResourceManager.ContainerInstance/src/Azure.ResourceManager.ContainerInstance.csproj],
      info	[Changelog] /home/cloudtest/.nuget/packages/microsoft.dotnet.apicompat/5.0.0-beta.20467.1/build/Microsoft.DotNet.ApiCompat.targets(96,5): error : ApiCompat failed for '/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/artifacts/bin/Azure.ResourceManager.ContainerInstance/Debug/netstandard2.0/Azure.ResourceManager.ContainerInstance.dll' [/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/containerinstance/Azure.ResourceManager.ContainerInstance/src/Azure.ResourceManager.ContainerInstance.csproj]
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 7685d4c. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
      command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh]
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice New patch version of npm available! 8.19.2 -> 8.19.3
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Changelog: <https://github.com/npm/cli/releases/tag/v8.19.3>
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Run `npm install -g npm@8.19.3` to update!
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice
    • ️✔️track2_azure-mgmt-containerinstance [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] ### Features Added
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog]   - Model ContainerGroup has a new parameter extensions
      info	[Changelog]   - Model ContainerGroupProperties has a new parameter extensions
      info	[Changelog]   - Model EncryptionProperties has a new parameter identity
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-java warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 7685d4c. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	./eng/mgmt/automation/init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	./eng/mgmt/automation/generate.py ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateOutput.json
      warn	No file changes detected after generation
      warn	No package detected after generation
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 7685d4c. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./eng/scripts/automation_init.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	generator automation-v2 ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️sdk/resourcemanager/containerinstance/armcontainerinstance [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes] Breaking Change Detected
      info	[Changelog] ### Breaking Changes
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] - Struct `CloudError` has been removed
      info	[Changelog] - Struct `CloudErrorBody` has been removed
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] ### Features Added
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `DeploymentExtensionSpec`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `DeploymentExtensionSpecProperties`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `Identity` in struct `EncryptionProperties`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `Extensions` in struct `ContainerGroupPropertiesProperties`
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] Total 4 breaking change(s), 6 additive change(s).
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 7685d4c. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh .scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json
      warn	File azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	sh .scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️@azure/arm-containerinstance [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] **Features**
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog]   - Added Interface DeploymentExtensionSpec
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface ContainerGroupProperties has a new optional parameter extensions
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface EncryptionProperties has a new optional parameter identity
    ️⚠️ azure-resource-manager-schemas warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 7685d4c. Schema Automation 14.0.0
      command	.sdkauto/initScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[initScript.sh]
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile The package-lock.json file was created with an old version of npm,
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile so supplemental metadata must be fetched from the registry.
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile This is a one-time fix-up, please be patient...
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
      warn	File azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	.sdkauto/generateScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️containerinstance [View full logs]  [Release Schema Changes]
    ️️✔️ azure-powershell succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 7685d4c. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./tools/SwaggerCI/init.sh ../azure-powershell_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	pwsh ./tools/SwaggerCI/psci.ps1 ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️Az.ContainerInstance [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Oct 17, 2022

    Generated ApiView

    Language Package Name ApiView Link
    Go sdk/resourcemanager/containerinstance/armcontainerinstance Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.
    Python track2_azure-mgmt-containerinstance Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.
    .Net Azure.ResourceManager.ContainerInstance Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.
    JavaScript @azure/arm-containerinstance Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.

    @fnuarnav fnuarnav marked this pull request as ready for review October 27, 2022 18:08
    @openapi-workflow-bot openapi-workflow-bot bot added ARMReview WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Nov 1, 2022
    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi, @fnuarnav your PR are labelled with WaitForARMFeedback. A notification email will be sent out shortly afterwards to notify ARM review board(armapireview@microsoft.com).

    @NetRock NetRock added the ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review label Nov 1, 2022
    @openapi-workflow-bot openapi-workflow-bot bot removed the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Nov 1, 2022
    @AzureRestAPISpecReview AzureRestAPISpecReview added new-api-version ReadyForApiTest <valid label in PR review process>add this label when swagger and service APIs are ready for test labels Nov 3, 2022
    @ruowan ruowan merged commit 7685d4c into Azure:main Nov 4, 2022
    ghost pushed a commit to Azure/azure-resource-manager-schemas that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2022
    anandanthony pushed a commit to anandMicro/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2022
    … version stable/2022-09-01 (Azure#21158)
    
    * Adds base for updating Microsoft.ContainerInstance from version stable/2021-10-01 to version 2022-09-01
    
    * Updates readme
    
    * Updates API version in new specs and examples
    
    * Adding a new property 'identity' to EncryptionProperties
    
    * Including retry timeout minutes as part of same api version update
    
    * Fixing SpellCheck error
    
    * added Extensions property to swagger spec
    
    * add x-ms-identifier; fix spellings
    
    * remove retryTimeoutMinutes from spec
    
    * use correct nesting for extension properties
    
    * extension required properties
    
    * added contianer group extension example
    
    * add reference to extensions example
    
    * added example for contianer group encryptionProperties
    
    * fix errors in example schema
    
    * added LRO headery azure-asyncoperation to examples
    
    Co-authored-by: Sandeep Prakash <sandy4ualso@hotmail.com>
    Co-authored-by: Sandeep Prakash <sandep@microsoft.com>
    kayousef-zz pushed a commit to kayousef-zz/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2022
    … version stable/2022-09-01 (Azure#21158)
    
    * Adds base for updating Microsoft.ContainerInstance from version stable/2021-10-01 to version 2022-09-01
    
    * Updates readme
    
    * Updates API version in new specs and examples
    
    * Adding a new property 'identity' to EncryptionProperties
    
    * Including retry timeout minutes as part of same api version update
    
    * Fixing SpellCheck error
    
    * added Extensions property to swagger spec
    
    * add x-ms-identifier; fix spellings
    
    * remove retryTimeoutMinutes from spec
    
    * use correct nesting for extension properties
    
    * extension required properties
    
    * added contianer group extension example
    
    * add reference to extensions example
    
    * added example for contianer group encryptionProperties
    
    * fix errors in example schema
    
    * added LRO headery azure-asyncoperation to examples
    
    Co-authored-by: Sandeep Prakash <sandy4ualso@hotmail.com>
    Co-authored-by: Sandeep Prakash <sandep@microsoft.com>
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    ARMReview ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review CI-BreakingChange-Go Container Instances new-api-version ReadyForApiTest <valid label in PR review process>add this label when swagger and service APIs are ready for test resource-manager
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    5 participants