Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Hub Generated] Publish private branch 'user/jimmyca/fixAppConfigSpec' #19882

Conversation

jimmyca15
Copy link
Member

This is a PR generated at OpenAPI Hub. You can view your work branch via this link.

ARM API Information (Control Plane)

Azure 1st Party Service can try out the Shift Left experience to initiate API design review from ADO code repo. If you are interested, may request engineering support by filling in with the form https://aka.ms/ShiftLeftSupportForm.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
  4. By default, Azure SDKs of all languages (.NET/Python/Java/JavaScript for both management-plane SDK and data-plane SDK, Go for management-plane SDK only ) MUST be refreshed with/after swagger of new version is published. If you prefer NOT to refresh any specific SDK language upon swagger updates in the current PR, please leave details with justification here.

Contribution checklist (MS Employees Only):

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
      -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. For more details refer to the wiki.
  • Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If you have any breaking changes as defined in the Breaking Change Policy, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board.

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Additional details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking Change Wiki.

NOTE: To update API(s) in public preview for over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

* Remove list key values operation.
* Update description for PUT private endpoint connection to be clear it can't be used to create.
* Added example for list operations API.
@jimmyca15
Copy link
Member Author

The PR is created based on the updates in the private branch. The updates in the PR has already been reviewed and approved with this PR Azure/azure-rest-api-specs-pr/7780

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @jimmyca15 Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vscswagger@microsoft.com

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Jul 21, 2022

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️❌BreakingChange: 1 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
    compared swaggers (via Oad v0.10.4)] new version base version
    appconfiguration.json 2022-05-01(7abd680) 2022-05-01(main)
    Rule Message
    1005 - RemovedPath The new version is missing a path that was found in the old version. Was path '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.AppConfiguration/configurationStores/{configStoreName}/keyValues' removed or restructured?
    Old: Microsoft.AppConfiguration/stable/2022-05-01/appconfiguration.json#L815:5
    ️️✔️Breaking Change(Cross-Version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There is no credential detected.
    ️⚠️LintDiff: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]
    compared tags (via openapi-validator v2.0.0) new version base version
    package-2022-05-01 package-2022-05-01(7abd680) package-2022-05-01(main)

    The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

    Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

    Rule Message
    CreateOperationAsyncResponseValidation An async PUT operation must set long running operation options 'x-ms-long-running-operation-options'
    Location: Microsoft.AppConfiguration/stable/2022-05-01/appconfiguration.json#L154
    DeleteOperationAsyncResponseValidation An async DELETE operation must set long running operation options 'x-ms-long-running-operation-options'
    Location: Microsoft.AppConfiguration/stable/2022-05-01/appconfiguration.json#L216
    LroLocationHeader A 202 response should include an Location response header.
    Location: Microsoft.AppConfiguration/stable/2022-05-01/appconfiguration.json#L240
    LroPatch202 The async patch operation should return 202.
    Location: Microsoft.AppConfiguration/stable/2022-05-01/appconfiguration.json#L289
    ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'privateEndpointConnectionName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
    Location: Microsoft.AppConfiguration/stable/2022-05-01/appconfiguration.json#L562
    CreateOperationAsyncResponseValidation An async PUT operation must set long running operation options 'x-ms-long-running-operation-options'
    Location: Microsoft.AppConfiguration/stable/2022-05-01/appconfiguration.json#L610
    DeleteOperationAsyncResponseValidation An async DELETE operation must set long running operation options 'x-ms-long-running-operation-options'
    Location: Microsoft.AppConfiguration/stable/2022-05-01/appconfiguration.json#L673
    LroLocationHeader A 202 response should include an Location response header.
    Location: Microsoft.AppConfiguration/stable/2022-05-01/appconfiguration.json#L704
    ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'groupName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
    Location: Microsoft.AppConfiguration/stable/2022-05-01/appconfiguration.json#L770
    ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'keyValueName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
    Location: Microsoft.AppConfiguration/stable/2022-05-01/appconfiguration.json#L819
    DeleteOperationAsyncResponseValidation An async DELETE operation must set long running operation options 'x-ms-long-running-operation-options'
    Location: Microsoft.AppConfiguration/stable/2022-05-01/appconfiguration.json#L923
    LroLocationHeader A 202 response should include an Location response header.
    Location: Microsoft.AppConfiguration/stable/2022-05-01/appconfiguration.json#L954
    PostOperationAsyncResponseValidation An async POST operation must set long running operation options 'x-ms-long-running-operation-options'
    Location: Microsoft.AppConfiguration/stable/2022-05-01/appconfiguration.json#L1057
    LroLocationHeader A 202 response should include an Location response header.
    Location: Microsoft.AppConfiguration/stable/2022-05-01/appconfiguration.json#L1082
    XmsParameterLocation The parameter 'SubscriptionIdParameter' is defined in global parameters section without 'x-ms-parameter-location' extension. This would add the parameter as the client property. Please ensure that this is exactly you want. If so, apply the extension 'x-ms-parameter-location': 'client'. Else, apply the extension 'x-ms-parameter-location': 'method'.
    Location: Microsoft.AppConfiguration/stable/2022-05-01/appconfiguration.json#L2186
    XmsParameterLocation The parameter 'ApiVersionParameter' is defined in global parameters section without 'x-ms-parameter-location' extension. This would add the parameter as the client property. Please ensure that this is exactly you want. If so, apply the extension 'x-ms-parameter-location': 'client'. Else, apply the extension 'x-ms-parameter-location': 'method'.
    Location: Microsoft.AppConfiguration/stable/2022-05-01/appconfiguration.json#L2212
    ⚠️ XmsLongRunningOperationOptions The x-ms-long-running-operation-options should be specified explicitly to indicate the type of response header to track the async operation.
    Location: Microsoft.AppConfiguration/stable/2022-05-01/appconfiguration.json#L154
    ⚠️ XmsLongRunningOperationOptions The x-ms-long-running-operation-options should be specified explicitly to indicate the type of response header to track the async operation.
    Location: Microsoft.AppConfiguration/stable/2022-05-01/appconfiguration.json#L216
    ⚠️ XmsLongRunningOperationOptions The x-ms-long-running-operation-options should be specified explicitly to indicate the type of response header to track the async operation.
    Location: Microsoft.AppConfiguration/stable/2022-05-01/appconfiguration.json#L260
    ⚠️ RequiredReadOnlySystemData The response of operation:'PrivateEndpointConnections_Get' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response.
    Location: Microsoft.AppConfiguration/stable/2022-05-01/appconfiguration.json#L563
    ⚠️ RequiredReadOnlySystemData The response of operation:'PrivateEndpointConnections_CreateOrUpdate' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response.
    Location: Microsoft.AppConfiguration/stable/2022-05-01/appconfiguration.json#L610
    ⚠️ XmsLongRunningOperationOptions The x-ms-long-running-operation-options should be specified explicitly to indicate the type of response header to track the async operation.
    Location: Microsoft.AppConfiguration/stable/2022-05-01/appconfiguration.json#L610
    ⚠️ XmsLongRunningOperationOptions The x-ms-long-running-operation-options should be specified explicitly to indicate the type of response header to track the async operation.
    Location: Microsoft.AppConfiguration/stable/2022-05-01/appconfiguration.json#L673
    ⚠️ RequiredReadOnlySystemData The response of operation:'KeyValues_Get' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response.
    Location: Microsoft.AppConfiguration/stable/2022-05-01/appconfiguration.json#L820
    ⚠️ RequiredReadOnlySystemData The response of operation:'KeyValues_CreateOrUpdate' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response.
    Location: Microsoft.AppConfiguration/stable/2022-05-01/appconfiguration.json#L867
    ⚠️ XmsLongRunningOperationOptions The x-ms-long-running-operation-options should be specified explicitly to indicate the type of response header to track the async operation.
    Location: Microsoft.AppConfiguration/stable/2022-05-01/appconfiguration.json#L923
    ⚠️ XmsLongRunningOperationOptions The x-ms-long-running-operation-options should be specified explicitly to indicate the type of response header to track the async operation.
    Location: Microsoft.AppConfiguration/stable/2022-05-01/appconfiguration.json#L1057
    ⚠️ UniqueXmsExample Do not have duplicate name of x-ms-example, make sure every x-ms-example name unique. Duplicate x-ms-example: ConfigurationStores_CheckNameAvailable
    Location: Microsoft.AppConfiguration/stable/2022-05-01/appconfiguration.json#L1143
    ⚠️ UniqueXmsExample Do not have duplicate name of x-ms-example, make sure every x-ms-example name unique. Duplicate x-ms-example: ConfigurationStores_CheckNameNotAvailable
    Location: Microsoft.AppConfiguration/stable/2022-05-01/appconfiguration.json#L1143
    ⚠️ EnumInsteadOfBoolean Booleans properties are not descriptive in all cases and can make them to use, evaluate whether is makes sense to keep the property as boolean or turn it into an enum.
    Location: Microsoft.AppConfiguration/stable/2022-05-01/appconfiguration.json#L1260
    ️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Avocado.
    ️️✔️ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️~[Staging] ServiceAPIReadinessTest succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ServiceAPIReadinessTest.

    Operation coverage: total: 0, untested: 0, failed: 0, passed: 0

    Traffic Validation is finished. Check pipeline artifact for detail report.

    ️️✔️SwaggerAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️CadlAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passed for PoliCheck.
    ️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    ️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
    ️️✔️CadlValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for CadlValidation.
    ️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Summary.
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Jul 21, 2022

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
     Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account. 
    ️❌SDK Breaking Change Tracking failed [Detail]

    Breaking Changes Tracking

    azure-sdk-for-go - armappconfiguration - Approved - 2.0.0
    +	Field `KeyValueParameters` of struct `KeyValuesClientCreateOrUpdateOptions` has been removed
    +	Function `*KeyValuesClient.CreateOrUpdate` parameter(s) have been changed from `(context.Context, string, string, string, *KeyValuesClientCreateOrUpdateOptions)` to `(context.Context, string, string, string, KeyValue, *KeyValuesClientCreateOrUpdateOptions)`
    +	Function `*KeyValuesClient.NewListByConfigurationStorePager` has been removed
    +	Struct `KeyValuesClientListByConfigurationStoreOptions` has been removed
    +	Struct `KeyValuesClientListByConfigurationStoreResponse` has been removed
    azure-sdk-for-python-track2 - track2_azure-mgmt-appconfiguration - Approved - 2.2.0
    +	Removed operation KeyValuesOperations.list_by_configuration_store
    azure-sdk-for-js - @azure/arm-appconfiguration - Approved - 4.0.0
    +	Interface ConfigurationStoresListByResourceGroupNextOptionalParams no longer has parameter skipToken
    +	Interface ConfigurationStoresListKeysNextOptionalParams no longer has parameter skipToken
    +	Interface ConfigurationStoresListNextOptionalParams no longer has parameter skipToken
    +	Interface OperationsListNextOptionalParams no longer has parameter skipToken
    +	Removed operation KeyValues.listByConfigurationStore
    azure-sdk-for-go - sdk/resourcemanager/appconfiguration/armappconfiguration - Approved - 2.0.0
    +	Function `*KeyValuesClient.NewListByConfigurationStorePager` has been removed
    +	Struct `KeyValuesClientListByConfigurationStoreResponse` has been removed
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 2c4244e. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
      command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice New major version of npm available! 8.19.3 -> 9.4.1
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Changelog: <https://github.com/npm/cli/releases/tag/v9.4.1>
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Run `npm install -g npm@9.4.1` to update!
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice
    • ️✔️track2_azure-mgmt-appconfiguration [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes] Breaking Change Detected
      info	[Changelog] ### Breaking Changes
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog]   - Removed operation KeyValuesOperations.list_by_configuration_store
    ️❌ azure-sdk-for-net-track2 failed [Detail]
    • Failed [Logs]Release - Generate from 2c4244e. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Automation-Sdk-Init.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[31;1mGeneratePackage: �[0m/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/eng/scripts/automation/GenerateAndBuildLib.ps1:672
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1mLine |
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1m 672 | �[0m         �[36;1mGeneratePackage -projectFolder $projectFolder -sdkRootPath $s�[0m …
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1m     | �[31;1m         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[31;1m�[36;1m     | �[31;1mFailed to generate sdk. exit code: False
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[0m
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[31;1mGet-ChildItem: �[0m/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/eng/scripts/automation/GenerateAndBuildLib.ps1:760
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1mLine |
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1m 760 | �[0m … rtifacts += �[36;1mGet-ChildItem $artifactsPath -Filter *.nupkg -exclude *.s�[0m …
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1m     | �[31;1m               ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[31;1m�[36;1m     | �[31;1mCannot find path
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1m     | �[31;1m'/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/artifacts/packages/Debug/' because
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1m     | �[31;1mit does not exist.
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[0m
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[31;1mGeneratePackage: �[0m/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/eng/scripts/automation/GenerateAndBuildLib.ps1:672
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1mLine |
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1m 672 | �[0m         �[36;1mGeneratePackage -projectFolder $projectFolder -sdkRootPath $s�[0m …
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1m     | �[31;1m         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[31;1m�[36;1m     | �[31;1mFailed to generate sdk artifact
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[0m
    • Azure.ResourceManager.AppConfiguration [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog]
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-java warning [Detail]
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 2c4244e. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh .scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json
      warn	File azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	sh .scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️@azure/arm-appconfiguration [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes] Breaking Change Detected
      info	[Changelog] **Breaking Changes**
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog]   - Removed operation KeyValues.listByConfigurationStore
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface ConfigurationStoresListByResourceGroupNextOptionalParams no longer has parameter skipToken
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface ConfigurationStoresListKeysNextOptionalParams no longer has parameter skipToken
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface ConfigurationStoresListNextOptionalParams no longer has parameter skipToken
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface OperationsListNextOptionalParams no longer has parameter skipToken
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 2c4244e. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./eng/scripts/automation_init.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	generator automation-v2 ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️sdk/resourcemanager/appconfiguration/armappconfiguration [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes] Breaking Change Detected
      info	[Changelog] ### Breaking Changes
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] - Function `*KeyValuesClient.NewListByConfigurationStorePager` has been removed
      info	[Changelog] - Struct `KeyValuesClientListByConfigurationStoreResponse` has been removed
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] Total 3 breaking change(s), 0 additive change(s).
    ️⚠️ azure-resource-manager-schemas warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 2c4244e. Schema Automation 14.0.0
      command	.sdkauto/initScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[initScript.sh]  WARN old lockfile
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile The package-lock.json file was created with an old version of npm,
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile so supplemental metadata must be fetched from the registry.
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile This is a one-time fix-up, please be patient...
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
      warn	File azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	.sdkauto/generateScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateOutput.json
      warn	No file changes detected after generation
    • ️✔️appconfiguration [View full logs
    ️️✔️ azure-powershell succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 2c4244e. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./tools/SwaggerCI/init.sh ../azure-powershell_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	pwsh ./tools/SwaggerCI/psci.ps1 ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️Az.AppConfiguration [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @jimmyca15, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of Avocado, semantic validation, model validation, breaking change, lintDiff. If you have any questions, please post your questions in this channel https://aka.ms/swaggersupport.

    TaskHow to fixPriority
    AvocadoFix-AvocadoHigh
    Semantic validationFix-SemanticValidation-ErrorHigh
    Model validationFix-ModelValidation-ErrorHigh
    LintDiffFix-LintDiffhigh
    If you need further help, please feedback via swagger feedback.

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @jimmyca15, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review.
    Action: To initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
    If you want to know the production traffic statistic, please see ARM Traffic statistic.
    If you think it is false positive breaking change, please provide the reasons in the PR comment, report to Swagger Tooling Team via https://aka.ms/swaggerfeedback.
    Note: To avoid breaking change, you can refer to Shift Left Solution for detecting breaking change in early phase at your service code repository.

    @jimmyca15
    Copy link
    Member Author

    All breaking changes have been approved in the private repo PR.

    @jimmyca15
    Copy link
    Member Author

    Hello @qiaozha please let me know if there is anything I need to do to complete this PR. All approvals, including breaking change approval can be found in the private branch PR that this was published from.

    @jimmyca15
    Copy link
    Member Author

    Hello @qiaozha

    The breaking changes for this were approved in the private repo. can we merge this?

    @qiaozha
    Copy link
    Member

    qiaozha commented Aug 4, 2022

    @jimmyca15 Can you fix the avocado failure and prettier check failure ?

    @qiaozha qiaozha added the Approved-BreakingChange DO NOT USE! OBSOLETE label. See https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/issues/6374 label Aug 4, 2022
    @qiaozha
    Copy link
    Member

    qiaozha commented Aug 4, 2022

    The api breaking change is approved in previous private repo PR.

    Copy link
    Member

    @ArcturusZhang ArcturusZhang left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    I saw there are the reasons in the corresponding private PR. Approved

    @qiaozha
    Copy link
    Member

    qiaozha commented Jan 4, 2023

    @jimmyca15 can you fix the swagger model validation errors ?

    @qiaozha
    Copy link
    Member

    qiaozha commented Jan 4, 2023

    Also, there's staging lint diff error

    @jimmyca15
    Copy link
    Member Author

    @qiaozha Wouldn't fixing those model validation errors be an unapproved breaking change?

    Also, the lint diff error is the approved breaking change this PR is making. Is there a way for me to silence that lint diff error?

    @qiaozha
    Copy link
    Member

    qiaozha commented Jan 13, 2023

    @raych1 Can you help take a look at the Model Validation error ? Thanks

    Comment on lines 179 to 184
    - suppress: R4015
    from: appconfiguration.json
    where: $.definitions.KeyValue
    - suppress: R3010
    from: appconfiguration.json
    where: $.definitions.KeyValue
    Copy link
    Member

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    @jianyexi Can you help review the suppression directive here ? Thanks

    @qiaozha
    Copy link
    Member

    qiaozha commented Jan 13, 2023

    @ArcturusZhang Can you help take a look at the dotnet sdk track2 generation error ? Thanks

    @jimmyca15
    Copy link
    Member Author

    @qiaozha I see you mentioned some people. Should I be reaching out to these individuals for the concerns you mentioned? We really need this checked in.

    Please note that all these breaking changes were requested and approved in the private repo PR this was generated from.

    https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs-pr/pull/7780

    @raych1
    Copy link
    Contributor

    raych1 commented Feb 2, 2023

    @jimmyca15 , please refer to this example to add LRO headers to swagger examples to fix model validation errors.

    @tadelesh tadelesh added the Approved-SdkBreakingChange-Go Approve the breaking change tracking for azure-sdk-for-go label Feb 2, 2023
    @jimmyca15 jimmyca15 force-pushed the published/jimmyca15/azure-rest-api-specs-pr/user/jimmyca/fixAppConfigSpec branch from 635a22f to 6d6032b Compare February 2, 2023 19:17
    @jimmyca15 jimmyca15 force-pushed the published/jimmyca15/azure-rest-api-specs-pr/user/jimmyca/fixAppConfigSpec branch from 6d6032b to 7abd680 Compare February 2, 2023 22:07
    @jimmyca15
    Copy link
    Member Author

    @raych1 I have added it and resolved the model validation errors.

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    Approved-BreakingChange DO NOT USE! OBSOLETE label. See https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/issues/6374 Approved-SdkBreakingChange-Go Approve the breaking change tracking for azure-sdk-for-go Approved-SdkBreakingChange-JavaScript Approved-SdkBreakingChange-Python BreakingChangeReviewRequired <valid label in PR review process>add this label when breaking change review is required CI-BreakingChange-Go CI-BreakingChange-JavaScript resource-manager SuppressionReviewRequired
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    8 participants