Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert latest APIs which are not ready for downstream clients #18702

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 18, 2022

Conversation

ericshape
Copy link
Contributor

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
  4. If updating an existing version, please select the specific language SDKs and CLIs that must be refreshed after the swagger is published.
    • SDK of .NET (need service team to ensure code readiness)
    • SDK of Python
    • SDK of Java
    • SDK of Js
    • SDK of Go
    • PowerShell
    • CLI
    • Terraform
    • No refresh required for updates in this PR

Contribution checklist:

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that label "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added automatically to begin ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays to the manifest.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
      -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you are using OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. More details, refer to the wiki.
  • Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If any of the following scenarios apply to the PR, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.

  • Removing API(s) in a stable version
  • Removing properties in a stable version
  • Removing API version(s) in a stable version
  • Updating API in a stable or public preview version with Breaking Change Validation errors
  • Updating API(s) in public preview over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@ghost ghost added the SQL label Apr 15, 2022
@ericshape ericshape changed the title Remove APIs are not ready for downstream clients Remove latest APIs are not ready for downstream clients Apr 15, 2022
@ericshape ericshape changed the title Remove latest APIs are not ready for downstream clients Revert latest APIs are not ready for downstream clients Apr 15, 2022
@ericshape ericshape changed the title Revert latest APIs are not ready for downstream clients Revert latest APIs which are not ready for downstream clients Apr 15, 2022
@raych1 raych1 self-assigned this Apr 18, 2022
@ericshape
Copy link
Contributor Author

/azp run

@openapi-pipeline-app
Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Apr 18, 2022

Swagger Validation Report

️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️LintDiff succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for LintDiff.

️❌Avocado: 7 Errors, 1 Warnings failed [Detail]
Rule Message
NOT_LATEST_API_VERSION_IN_DEFAULT_TAG The default tag does not contains the latest API version. Please make sure the latest api version swaggers are in the default tag.
readme: specification/sql/resource-manager/readme.md
json: Microsoft.Sql/preview/2021-11-01-preview/ReplicationLinks.json
MISSING_APIS_IN_DEFAULT_TAG The default tag does not contain all APIs in this RP. Please make sure the missing API swaggers are in the default tag.
readme: specification/sql/resource-manager/readme.md
json: Microsoft.Sql/preview/2021-11-01-preview/ReplicationLinks.json
NOT_LATEST_API_VERSION_IN_DEFAULT_TAG The default tag does not contains the latest API version. Please make sure the latest api version swaggers are in the default tag.
readme: specification/sql/resource-manager/readme.md
json: Microsoft.Sql/preview/2021-11-01-preview/SensitivityLabels.json
NOT_LATEST_API_VERSION_IN_DEFAULT_TAG The default tag does not contains the latest API version. Please make sure the latest api version swaggers are in the default tag.
readme: specification/sql/resource-manager/readme.md
json: Microsoft.Sql/preview/2021-11-01-preview/ManagedDatabaseSensitivityLabels.json
MISSING_APIS_IN_DEFAULT_TAG The default tag does not contain all APIs in this RP. Please make sure the missing API swaggers are in the default tag.
readme: specification/sql/resource-manager/readme.md
json: Microsoft.Sql/preview/2021-11-01-preview/ManagedDatabaseSensitivityLabels.json
MISSING_APIS_IN_DEFAULT_TAG The default tag does not contain all APIs in this RP. Please make sure the missing API swaggers are in the default tag.
readme: specification/sql/resource-manager/readme.md
json: Microsoft.Sql/preview/2021-11-01-preview/SensitivityLabels.json
MISSING_APIS_IN_DEFAULT_TAG The default tag does not contain all APIs in this RP. Please make sure the missing API swaggers are in the default tag.
readme: specification/sql/resource-manager/readme.md
json: Microsoft.Sql/preview/2021-11-01-preview/ManagedServerDnsAliases.json
⚠️ MULTIPLE_API_VERSION The default tag contains multiple API versions swaggers.
readme: specification/sql/resource-manager/readme.md
tag: specification/sql/resource-manager/readme.md#tag-package-composite-v5
️️✔️~[Staging] ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️Cross-Version Breaking Changes succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
️️✔️SDK Track2 Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SDKTrack2Validation
️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

@openapi-pipeline-app
Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Apr 18, 2022

Swagger Generation Artifacts

️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️❌SDK Breaking Change Tracking failed [Detail]

Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

️❌ azure-sdk-for-net failed [Detail]

Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]

Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-net-track2 succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-java warning [Detail]

Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

️🔄 azure-sdk-for-go inProgress [Detail]
️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go-track2 succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-js warning [Detail]

Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

️⚠️ azure-resource-manager-schemas warning [Detail]

Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi @ericshape, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of Avocado, semantic validation, model validation, breaking change, lintDiff. If you have any questions, please post your questions in this channel https://aka.ms/swaggersupport.

TaskHow to fixPriority
AvocadoFix-AvocadoHigh
Semantic validationFix-SemanticValidation-ErrorHigh
Model validationFix-ModelValidation-ErrorHigh
LintDiffFix-LintDiffhigh
If you need further help, please feedback via swagger feedback.

1 similar comment
@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi @ericshape, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of Avocado, semantic validation, model validation, breaking change, lintDiff. If you have any questions, please post your questions in this channel https://aka.ms/swaggersupport.

TaskHow to fixPriority
AvocadoFix-AvocadoHigh
Semantic validationFix-SemanticValidation-ErrorHigh
Model validationFix-ModelValidation-ErrorHigh
LintDiffFix-LintDiffhigh
If you need further help, please feedback via swagger feedback.

@raych1 raych1 merged commit 8b871ca into main Apr 18, 2022
Copy link
Member

@ostojicb ostojicb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

- Microsoft.Sql/stable/2014-04-01-legacy/replicationLinks_legacy.json was also removed during rebase, should that change also be reverted

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants