Adding 202 Accepted for deletion call #15874

sureleo · 2021-08-31T22:53:18Z

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

What's the purpose of the update?
- new service onboarding
- new API version
- update existing version for new feature
- update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
- Other, please clarify: We are leveraging K8Bridge and RPaas to handle resource deletion. RPaas and K8bridge are returning 202 all along but we did not define this response in the swagger. RPaas has acknowledged this bug in the response validation.
When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
If updating an existing version, please select the specific language SDKs and CLIs that must be refreshed after the swagger is published.
- SDK of .NET (need service team to ensure code readiness)
- SDK of Python
- SDK of Java
- SDK of Js
- SDK of Go
- PowerShell
- CLI
- Terraform
- No refresh required for updates in this PR

Contribution checklist:

I commit to follow the Breaking Change Policy of "no breaking changes"
I have reviewed the documentation for the workflow.
Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and errors have all been fixed in this PR. How to fix?

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

Change to data plane APIs

Adding new properties

All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to begin ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays to the manifest.
- Adding a new service
- Adding new API(s)
- Adding a new API version
  -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits.
Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If any of the following scenarios apply to the PR, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.

Removing API(s) in a stable version
Removing properties in a stable version
Removing API version(s) in a stable version
Updating API in a stable or public preview version with Breaking Change Validation errors
Updating API(s) in public preview over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

openapi-workflow-bot · 2021-08-31T22:53:20Z

Hi, @sureleo Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.

PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.

For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator

If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vsswagger@microsoft.com

openapi-workflow-bot · 2021-08-31T22:53:21Z

[Call for Action] To better understand Azure service dev/test scenario, and support Azure service developer better on Swagger and REST API related tests in early phase, please help to fill in with this survey https://aka.ms/SurveyForEarlyPhase. It will take 5 to 10 minutes. If you already complete survey, please neglect this comment. Thanks.

openapi-pipeline-app · 2021-08-31T22:53:22Z

Swagger Validation Report

️❌BreakingChange: 14 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]

Compared Swaggers (Based on Oad v0.9.0)
- current:preview/2021-07-01-preview/azurearcdata.json compared with base:preview/2021-07-01-preview/azurearcdata.json
- current:stable/2021-08-01/azurearcdata.json compared with base:stable/2021-08-01/azurearcdata.json

Rule	Message
`❌` 1011 - AddingResponseCode	The new version adds a response code '202'. New: Microsoft.AzureArcData/preview/2021-07-01-preview/azurearcdata.json#L276:11
`❌` 1011 - AddingResponseCode	The new version adds a response code '202'. New: Microsoft.AzureArcData/preview/2021-07-01-preview/azurearcdata.json#L572:11
`❌` 1011 - AddingResponseCode	The new version adds a response code '202'. New: Microsoft.AzureArcData/preview/2021-07-01-preview/azurearcdata.json#L868:11
`❌` 1011 - AddingResponseCode	The new version adds a response code '202'. New: Microsoft.AzureArcData/preview/2021-07-01-preview/azurearcdata.json#L1116:11
`❌` 1011 - AddingResponseCode	The new version adds a response code '202'. New: Microsoft.AzureArcData/stable/2021-08-01/azurearcdata.json#L276:11
`❌` 1011 - AddingResponseCode	The new version adds a response code '202'. New: Microsoft.AzureArcData/stable/2021-08-01/azurearcdata.json#L572:11
`❌` 1011 - AddingResponseCode	The new version adds a response code '202'. New: Microsoft.AzureArcData/stable/2021-08-01/azurearcdata.json#L820:11
`❌` 1044 - XmsLongRunningOperationChanged	The new version has a different 'x-ms-longrunning-operation' value than the previous one. New: Microsoft.AzureArcData/preview/2021-07-01-preview/azurearcdata.json#L247:7 Old: Microsoft.AzureArcData/preview/2021-07-01-preview/azurearcdata.json#L247:7
`❌` 1044 - XmsLongRunningOperationChanged	The new version has a different 'x-ms-longrunning-operation' value than the previous one. New: Microsoft.AzureArcData/preview/2021-07-01-preview/azurearcdata.json#L543:7 Old: Microsoft.AzureArcData/preview/2021-07-01-preview/azurearcdata.json#L539:7
`❌` 1044 - XmsLongRunningOperationChanged	The new version has a different 'x-ms-longrunning-operation' value than the previous one. New: Microsoft.AzureArcData/preview/2021-07-01-preview/azurearcdata.json#L839:7 Old: Microsoft.AzureArcData/preview/2021-07-01-preview/azurearcdata.json#L831:7
`❌` 1044 - XmsLongRunningOperationChanged	The new version has a different 'x-ms-longrunning-operation' value than the previous one. New: Microsoft.AzureArcData/preview/2021-07-01-preview/azurearcdata.json#L1088:7 Old: Microsoft.AzureArcData/preview/2021-07-01-preview/azurearcdata.json#L1076:7
`❌` 1044 - XmsLongRunningOperationChanged	The new version has a different 'x-ms-longrunning-operation' value than the previous one. New: Microsoft.AzureArcData/stable/2021-08-01/azurearcdata.json#L247:7 Old: Microsoft.AzureArcData/stable/2021-08-01/azurearcdata.json#L247:7
`❌` 1044 - XmsLongRunningOperationChanged	The new version has a different 'x-ms-longrunning-operation' value than the previous one. New: Microsoft.AzureArcData/stable/2021-08-01/azurearcdata.json#L543:7 Old: Microsoft.AzureArcData/stable/2021-08-01/azurearcdata.json#L539:7
`❌` 1044 - XmsLongRunningOperationChanged	The new version has a different 'x-ms-longrunning-operation' value than the previous one. New: Microsoft.AzureArcData/stable/2021-08-01/azurearcdata.json#L792:7 Old: Microsoft.AzureArcData/stable/2021-08-01/azurearcdata.json#L784:7

️⚠️LintDiff: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]

Linted configuring files (Based on source branch, openapi-validator v1.10.1 , classic-openapi-validator v1.1.10 )
- azurearcdata/resource-manager/readme.md tag:package-2021-08-01
- azurearcdata/resource-manager/readme.md tag:package-preview-2021-07-01
Linted configuring files (Based on target branch, openapi-validator v1.10.1 , classic-openapi-validator v1.1.10 )
- azurearcdata/resource-manager/readme.md tag:package-2021-08-01
- azurearcdata/resource-manager/readme.md tag:package-preview-2021-07-01

The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

Rule	Message
⚠️ R1001 - OperationIdNounVerb	Per the Noun_Verb convention for Operation Ids, the noun 'DataControllers' should not appear after the underscore. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.AzureArcData/stable/2021-08-01/azurearcdata.json#L733
⚠️ R1001 - OperationIdNounVerb	Per the Noun_Verb convention for Operation Ids, the noun 'DataControllers' should not appear after the underscore. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.AzureArcData/stable/2021-08-01/azurearcdata.json#L796
⚠️ R1001 - OperationIdNounVerb	Per the Noun_Verb convention for Operation Ids, the noun 'DataControllers' should not appear after the underscore. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.AzureArcData/stable/2021-08-01/azurearcdata.json#L844
⚠️ R1001 - OperationIdNounVerb	Per the Noun_Verb convention for Operation Ids, the noun 'DataControllers' should not appear after the underscore. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.AzureArcData/stable/2021-08-01/azurearcdata.json#L888
⚠️ R1001 - OperationIdNounVerb	Per the Noun_Verb convention for Operation Ids, the noun 'DataControllers' should not appear after the underscore. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.AzureArcData/preview/2021-07-01-preview/azurearcdata.json#L1029
⚠️ R1001 - OperationIdNounVerb	Per the Noun_Verb convention for Operation Ids, the noun 'DataControllers' should not appear after the underscore. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.AzureArcData/preview/2021-07-01-preview/azurearcdata.json#L1092
⚠️ R1001 - OperationIdNounVerb	Per the Noun_Verb convention for Operation Ids, the noun 'DataControllers' should not appear after the underscore. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.AzureArcData/preview/2021-07-01-preview/azurearcdata.json#L1140
⚠️ R1001 - OperationIdNounVerb	Per the Noun_Verb convention for Operation Ids, the noun 'DataControllers' should not appear after the underscore. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.AzureArcData/preview/2021-07-01-preview/azurearcdata.json#L1184
⚠️ R1006 - PutInOperationName	'PUT' operation 'DataControllers_PutDataController' should use method name 'Create'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.AzureArcData/stable/2021-08-01/azurearcdata.json#L733
⚠️ R1006 - PutInOperationName	'PUT' operation 'DataControllers_PutDataController' should use method name 'Create'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.AzureArcData/preview/2021-07-01-preview/azurearcdata.json#L1029
⚠️ R1007 - PatchInOperationName	'PATCH' operation 'DataControllers_PatchDataController' should use method name 'Update'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.AzureArcData/stable/2021-08-01/azurearcdata.json#L888
⚠️ R1007 - PatchInOperationName	'PATCH' operation 'DataControllers_PatchDataController' should use method name 'Update'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.AzureArcData/preview/2021-07-01-preview/azurearcdata.json#L1184
⚠️ R2001 - AvoidNestedProperties	Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience Location: Microsoft.AzureArcData/preview/2021-07-01-preview/azurearcdata.json#L1837
⚠️ R2018 - XmsEnumValidation	The enum types should have x-ms-enum type extension set with appropriate options. Property name: name Location: Microsoft.AzureArcData/stable/2021-08-01/azurearcdata.json#L975
⚠️ R2018 - XmsEnumValidation	The enum types should have x-ms-enum type extension set with appropriate options. Property name: name Location: Microsoft.AzureArcData/preview/2021-07-01-preview/azurearcdata.json#L1271
⚠️ R3017 - GuidUsage	Guid used in model definition 'OnPremiseProperty' for property 'id'. Usage of Guid is not recommanded. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board. Location: Microsoft.AzureArcData/stable/2021-08-01/azurearcdata.json#L1437
⚠️ R3017 - GuidUsage	Guid used in model definition 'LogAnalyticsWorkspaceConfig' for property 'workspaceId'. Usage of Guid is not recommanded. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board. Location: Microsoft.AzureArcData/stable/2021-08-01/azurearcdata.json#L1936
⚠️ R3017 - GuidUsage	Guid used in model definition 'UploadServicePrincipal' for property 'clientId'. Usage of Guid is not recommanded. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board. Location: Microsoft.AzureArcData/stable/2021-08-01/azurearcdata.json#L1956
⚠️ R3017 - GuidUsage	Guid used in model definition 'OnPremiseProperty' for property 'id'. Usage of Guid is not recommanded. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board. Location: Microsoft.AzureArcData/preview/2021-07-01-preview/azurearcdata.json#L1748
⚠️ R3017 - GuidUsage	Guid used in model definition 'LogAnalyticsWorkspaceConfig' for property 'workspaceId'. Usage of Guid is not recommanded. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board. Location: Microsoft.AzureArcData/preview/2021-07-01-preview/azurearcdata.json#L2208
⚠️ R3017 - GuidUsage	Guid used in model definition 'UploadServicePrincipal' for property 'clientId'. Usage of Guid is not recommanded. If GUIDs are absolutely required in your service, please get sign off from the Azure API review board. Location: Microsoft.AzureArcData/preview/2021-07-01-preview/azurearcdata.json#L2228
⚠️ R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: dev Location: Microsoft.AzureArcData/stable/2021-08-01/azurearcdata.json#L948
⚠️ R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: dev Location: Microsoft.AzureArcData/stable/2021-08-01/azurearcdata.json#L995
⚠️ R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: isDataAction Location: Microsoft.AzureArcData/stable/2021-08-01/azurearcdata.json#L1118
⚠️ R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: dev Location: Microsoft.AzureArcData/preview/2021-07-01-preview/azurearcdata.json#L1244
⚠️ R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: dev Location: Microsoft.AzureArcData/preview/2021-07-01-preview/azurearcdata.json#L1291
⚠️ R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean	Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: isDataAction Location: Microsoft.AzureArcData/preview/2021-07-01-preview/azurearcdata.json#L1437
⚠️ R3027 - TrackedResourceListByResourceGroup	The tracked resource, 'DataControllerResource', must have a list by resource group operation.(This rule does not apply for tenant level resources.) Location: Microsoft.AzureArcData/stable/2021-08-01/azurearcdata.json#L1249
⚠️ R3027 - TrackedResourceListByResourceGroup	The tracked resource, 'DataControllerResource', must have a list by resource group operation.(This rule does not apply for tenant level resources.) Location: Microsoft.AzureArcData/preview/2021-07-01-preview/azurearcdata.json#L1568
⚠️ R3028 - TrackedResourceListBySubscription	The tracked resource, 'DataControllerResource', must have a list by subscriptions operation. Location: Microsoft.AzureArcData/stable/2021-08-01/azurearcdata.json#L1249

️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for Avocado.

️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for ModelValidation.

️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for SemanticValidation.

️️✔️Cross-Version Breaking Changes succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

There are no breaking changes.

️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

There is no credential detected.

️️✔️[Staging] SDK Track2 Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for SDKTrack2Validation

The following tags are being changed in this PR

The following errors/warnings are introduced by current PR:

|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"azurearcdata/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-2021-08-01",
"details":"> Installing AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.8.0)"|
|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"azurearcdata/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-2021-08-01",
"details":"> Installed AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.8.0->1.8.0)"|

The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"azurearcdata/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-2021-08-01",
"details":"> Loading AutoRest extension '@autorest/modelerfour' (4.15.456->4.15.456)"|
|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"azurearcdata/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-preview-2021-07-01",
"details":"> Loading AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.8.0->1.8.0)"|
|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"azurearcdata/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-preview-2021-07-01",
"details":"> Loading AutoRest extension '@autorest/modelerfour' (4.15.456->4.15.456)"|

️️✔️[Staging] PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for PrettierCheck.

️️✔️[Staging] SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for SpellCheck.

️️✔️[Staging] Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).

_{Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?}

openapi-pipeline-app · 2021-08-31T22:53:22Z

Swagger Generation Artifacts

️️✔️[Staging] ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

 Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account.

️️✔️[Staging] SDK Breaking Change Tracking succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Breaking Changes Tracking

️✔️azure-sdk-for-python-track2 - track2_azure-mgmt-azurearcdata - first release
️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - azurearcdata/mgmt/2021-08-01/azurearcdata - v57.0.0

️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]

⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from e23a590. SDK Automation 14.0.0

command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json

️✔️track2_azure-mgmt-azurearcdata [View full logs] [Release SDK Changes]
- azure_mgmt_azurearcdata-1.0.0b1-py2.py3-none-any.whl
- azure-mgmt-azurearcdata-1.0.0b1.zip
```
info	[Changelog]   - Initial Release
```

️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-java warning [Detail]

⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from e23a590. SDK Automation 14.0.0

command	./eng/mgmt/automation/init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initOutput.json
command	./eng/mgmt/automation/generate.py ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateOutput.json
cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-15 05:40:32 INFO [VERSION][Found] current version "com.azure.resourcemanager:azure-resourcemanager-azurearcdata;1.0.0-beta.1;1.0.0-beta.2"
cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-15 05:40:32 INFO [VERSION][Not Found] cannot find stable version, current version "1.0.0-beta.2"
cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-15 05:40:32 INFO autorest --version=3.6.0 --use=@autorest/java@4.0.37 --java.azure-libraries-for-java-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-java --java.output-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-java/sdk/azurearcdata/azure-resourcemanager-azurearcdata --java.namespace=com.azure.resourcemanager.azurearcdata   --java --pipeline.modelerfour.additional-checks=false --pipeline.modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication=true --azure-arm --verbose --sdk-integration --fluent=lite --java.fluent=lite --java.license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_SMALL  ../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/azurearcdata/resource-manager/readme.md
cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-15 05:40:59 INFO [CI][Skip] ci.yml already has module azure-resourcemanager-azurearcdata
cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-15 05:40:59 INFO [POM][Process] dealing with pom.xml
cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-15 05:40:59 INFO [POM][Skip] pom already has module azure-resourcemanager-azurearcdata
cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-15 05:40:59 INFO [POM][Success] Write to pom.xml
cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-15 05:40:59 INFO [POM][Process] dealing with root pom
cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-15 05:40:59 INFO [POM][Skip] pom already has module sdk/azurearcdata
cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-09-15 05:40:59 INFO [POM][Success] Write to root pom

️✔️azure-resourcemanager-azurearcdata [View full logs] [Release SDK Changes]

cmderr	[Inst] 2021-09-15 05:42:47 DEBUG Got artifact_id: azure-resourcemanager-azurearcdata
cmderr	[Inst] 2021-09-15 05:42:47 DEBUG Got artifact: pom.xml
cmderr	[Inst] 2021-09-15 05:42:47 DEBUG Got artifact: azure-resourcemanager-azurearcdata-1.0.0-beta.2-sources.jar
cmderr	[Inst] 2021-09-15 05:42:47 DEBUG Got artifact: azure-resourcemanager-azurearcdata-1.0.0-beta.2-javadoc.jar
cmderr	[Inst] 2021-09-15 05:42:47 DEBUG Got artifact: azure-resourcemanager-azurearcdata-1.0.0-beta.2.jar
cmderr	[Inst] 2021-09-15 05:42:47 DEBUG Match jar package: azure-resourcemanager-azurearcdata-1.0.0-beta.2.jar
cmderr	[Inst] 2021-09-15 05:42:47 DEBUG output: {"full": "```sh\ncurl -L \"https://portal.azure-devex-tools.com/api/sdk-dl-pub?p=Azure/15874/azure-sdk-for-java/azure-resourcemanager-azurearcdata/azure-resourcemanager-azurearcdata-1.0.0-beta.2.jar\" -o azure-resourcemanager-azurearcdata-1.0.0-beta.2.jar\nmvn install:install-file -DgroupId=com.azure.resourcemanager -DartifactId=azure-resourcemanager-azurearcdata -Dversion=1.0.0-beta.0 -Dfile=azure-resourcemanager-azurearcdata-1.0.0-beta.2.jar -Dpackaging=jar -DgeneratePom=true
```"}

️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from e23a590. SDK Automation 14.0.0

command	sh ./initScript.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
command	generator automation ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json

️✔️azurearcdata/mgmt/2021-08-01/azurearcdata [View full logs] [Release SDK Changes]
```
info	[Changelog] This is a new package
```

️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from e23a590. SDK Automation 14.0.0

warn	Skip initScript due to not configured
command	autorest --version=V2 --typescript --license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_NO_VERSION --use=@microsoft.azure/autorest.typescript@4.7.0 --typescript-sdks-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-js/azure-sdk-for-js ../../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/azurearcdata/resource-manager/readme.md

️✔️@azure/arm-azurearcdata [View full logs] [Release SDK Changes]

azure-arm-azurearcdata-1.0.0.tgz

cmderr	[npmPack] loaded rollup.config.js with warnings
cmderr	[npmPack] (!) Unused external imports
cmderr	[npmPack] default imported from external module 'rollup' but never used
cmderr	[npmPack] ./esm/azureArcDataManagementClient.js → ./dist/arm-azurearcdata.js...
cmderr	[npmPack] created ./dist/arm-azurearcdata.js in 341ms

️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-net succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from e23a590. SDK Automation 14.0.0

warn	Skip initScript due to not configured
command	sudo apt-get install -y dotnet-sdk-5.0
command	autorest --version=V2 --csharp --reflect-api-versions --license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_NO_VERSION --use=@microsoft.azure/autorest.csharp@2.3.82 --csharp-sdks-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk ../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/azurearcdata/resource-manager/readme.md
cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied

️✔️Microsoft.Azure.Management.AzureArcData [View full logs] [Release SDK Changes]
```
warn	Skip artifact folder because it doesn't exist: artifacts/packages
```

️⚠️ azure-resource-manager-schemas warning [Detail]

⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from e23a590. Schema Automation 14.0.0

command	.sdkauto/initScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json
cmderr	[initScript.sh] WARN old lockfile
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile The package-lock.json file was created with an old version of npm,
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile so supplemental metadata must be fetched from the registry.
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile This is a one-time fix-up, please be patient...
cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
warn	File azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
command	.sdkauto/generateScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateOutput.json
warn	No file changes detected after generation

️✔️azurearcdata [View full logs]

_{Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?}

openapi-workflow-bot · 2021-08-31T22:55:01Z

Hi @sureleo, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review.
Action: To initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
If you want to know the production traffic statistic, please see ARM Traffic statistic.
If you think it is false positive breaking change, please provide the reasons in the PR comment, report to Swagger Tooling Team via https://aka.ms/swaggerfeedback.

sureleo · 2021-09-01T00:18:59Z

https://msazure.visualstudio.com/One/_workitems/edit/10744495

Breaking change review intake created.

sureleo · 2021-09-01T00:21:46Z

Also adding email from @sanjaiganesh

RpaaS is missing swagger validation in DELETE path. We need to add it, in a non-breaking way. Send out announcement to give time to partners and possibly enforcing in canary first.
Filed Product Backlog Item 10741831: Add swagger validation for DELETEs

Thanks
Sanjai

lirenhe · 2021-09-01T05:04:00Z

@sureleo, as your PR contains breaking change, please follow http://aka.ms/bcforapi to get it reviewed.

sureleo · 2021-09-01T17:26:02Z

@sureleo, as your PR contains breaking change, please follow http://aka.ms/bcforapi to get it reviewed.

Thanks. I have already created breaking change intake.

* Adding 202 for deletion call * Adding headers to suppress warnings

Adding 202 for deletion call

25c0fbd

openapi-pipeline-app bot added the BreakingChangeReviewRequired label Aug 31, 2021

Adding headers to suppress warnings

d2a42d8

openapi-sdkautomation bot mentioned this pull request Aug 31, 2021

[AutoPR azure-resourcemanager-azurearcdata] Adding 202 Accepted for deletion call AzureSDKAutomation/azure-sdk-for-java#10556

Closed

sureleo marked this pull request as ready for review September 1, 2021 00:17

openapi-assignment-bot bot assigned lirenhe Sep 1, 2021

lirenhe added the Reviewed-FeedbackProvided label Sep 1, 2021

JeffreyRichter added the Approved-BreakingChange DO NOT USE! OBSOLETE label. See https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/issues/6374 label Sep 13, 2021

lirenhe approved these changes Sep 15, 2021

View reviewed changes

lirenhe merged commit e23a590 into Azure:main Sep 15, 2021

sureleo deleted the dev/shul/add-delete-202 branch September 16, 2021 03:13

LeiWang3 pushed a commit to LeiWang3/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2022

Adding 202 Accepted for deletion call (Azure#15874)

26b1d0e

* Adding 202 for deletion call * Adding headers to suppress warnings

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Adding 202 Accepted for deletion call #15874

Adding 202 Accepted for deletion call #15874

sureleo commented Aug 31, 2021 •

edited

Loading

openapi-workflow-bot bot commented Aug 31, 2021

openapi-workflow-bot bot commented Aug 31, 2021

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Aug 31, 2021 •

edited

Loading

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Aug 31, 2021 •

edited

Loading

Breaking Changes Tracking

openapi-workflow-bot bot commented Aug 31, 2021

sureleo commented Sep 1, 2021

sureleo commented Sep 1, 2021

lirenhe commented Sep 1, 2021

sureleo commented Sep 1, 2021

Adding 202 Accepted for deletion call #15874

Adding 202 Accepted for deletion call #15874

Conversation

sureleo commented Aug 31, 2021 • edited Loading

Changelog

Contribution checklist:

ARM API Review Checklist

Breaking Change Review Checklist

openapi-workflow-bot bot commented Aug 31, 2021

openapi-workflow-bot bot commented Aug 31, 2021

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Aug 31, 2021 • edited Loading

Swagger Validation Report

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Aug 31, 2021 • edited Loading

Swagger Generation Artifacts

Breaking Changes Tracking

openapi-workflow-bot bot commented Aug 31, 2021

sureleo commented Sep 1, 2021

sureleo commented Sep 1, 2021

lirenhe commented Sep 1, 2021

sureleo commented Sep 1, 2021

sureleo commented Aug 31, 2021 •

edited

Loading

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Aug 31, 2021 •

edited

Loading

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Aug 31, 2021 •

edited

Loading