-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Resume V2021-02-01-Preview BackupShortTermRetentionPolicies API Specification #14671
Resume V2021-02-01-Preview BackupShortTermRetentionPolicies API Specification #14671
Conversation
Hi, @lululilliancoding Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips. Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vsswagger@microsoft.com |
Swagger Validation Report
|
Rule | Message |
---|---|
1041 - AddedPropertyInResponse |
The new version has a new property 'diffBackupIntervalInHours' in response that was not found in the old version. New: Microsoft.Sql/preview/2021-02-01-preview/BackupShortTermRetentionPolicies.json#L259:7 Old: Microsoft.Sql/preview/2021-02-01-preview/BackupShortTermRetentionPolicies.json#L259:7 |
1045 - AddedOptionalProperty |
The new version has a new optional property 'diffBackupIntervalInHours' that was not found in the old version. New: Microsoft.Sql/preview/2021-02-01-preview/BackupShortTermRetentionPolicies.json#L259:7 Old: Microsoft.Sql/preview/2021-02-01-preview/BackupShortTermRetentionPolicies.json#L259:7 |
️⚠️
LintDiff: 2 Warnings warning [Detail]
- Linted configuring files (Based on source branch, openapi-validator v1.10.0 , classic-openapi-validator v1.1.8 )
- Linted configuring files (Based on target branch, openapi-validator v1.10.0 , classic-openapi-validator v1.1.8 )
Rule | Message |
---|---|
Do not have duplicate name of x-ms-example, make sure every x-ms-example name unique. Duplicate x-ms-example: Get the short term retention policy for the database. Location: Microsoft.Sql/preview/2021-02-01-preview/BackupShortTermRetentionPolicies.json#L68 |
|
Do not have duplicate name of x-ms-example, make sure every x-ms-example name unique. Duplicate x-ms-example: Update the short term retention policy for the database. Location: Microsoft.Sql/preview/2021-02-01-preview/BackupShortTermRetentionPolicies.json#L135 |
The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:
Only 10 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.
Rule | Message |
---|---|
R2020 - RequiredPropertiesMissingInResourceModel |
Model definition 'FirewallRule' must have the properties 'name', 'id' and 'type' in its hierarchy and these properties must be marked as readonly. Location: Microsoft.Sql/preview/2020-11-01-preview/FirewallRules.json#L308 |
R2020 - RequiredPropertiesMissingInResourceModel |
Model definition 'ProxyResourceWithWritableName' must have the properties 'name', 'id' and 'type' in its hierarchy and these properties must be marked as readonly. Location: Microsoft.Sql/preview/2020-11-01-preview/FirewallRules.json#L298 |
R4010 - RequiredDefaultResponse |
The response is defined but without a default error response implementation.Consider adding it.' Location: Microsoft.Sql/stable/2014-04-01/backups_legacy.json#L52 |
R4010 - RequiredDefaultResponse |
The response is defined but without a default error response implementation.Consider adding it.' Location: Microsoft.Sql/stable/2014-04-01/backups_legacy.json#L88 |
R4010 - RequiredDefaultResponse |
The response is defined but without a default error response implementation.Consider adding it.' Location: Microsoft.Sql/stable/2014-04-01/connectionPolicies.json#L57 |
R4010 - RequiredDefaultResponse |
The response is defined but without a default error response implementation.Consider adding it.' Location: Microsoft.Sql/stable/2014-04-01/connectionPolicies.json#L100 |
R4010 - RequiredDefaultResponse |
The response is defined but without a default error response implementation.Consider adding it.' Location: Microsoft.Sql/stable/2014-04-01/dataMasking.json#L63 |
R4010 - RequiredDefaultResponse |
The response is defined but without a default error response implementation.Consider adding it.' Location: Microsoft.Sql/stable/2014-04-01/dataMasking.json#L103 |
R4010 - RequiredDefaultResponse |
The response is defined but without a default error response implementation.Consider adding it.' Location: Microsoft.Sql/stable/2014-04-01/dataMasking.json#L170 |
R4010 - RequiredDefaultResponse |
The response is defined but without a default error response implementation.Consider adding it.' Location: Microsoft.Sql/stable/2014-04-01/dataMasking.json#L218 |
️⚠️
Avocado: 1 Warnings warning [Detail]
Rule | Message |
---|---|
The default tag contains multiple API versions swaggers. readme: specification/sql/resource-manager/readme.md tag: specification/sql/resource-manager/readme.md#tag-package-composite-v5 |
️️✔️
ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️
SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️
Cross-Version Breaking Changes succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️
CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
️️✔️
[Staging] SDK Track2 Validation succeeded [Detail]
- The following tags are being changed in this PR
|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"sql/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-composite-v5",
"details":"> Installing AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.8.0)"|
|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"sql/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-composite-v5",
"details":"> Installed AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.8.0->1.8.0)"|
The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:
Rule | Message |
---|---|
AutorestCore/Exception |
"readme":"sql/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-composite-v5", "details":"Error: Plugin pre-namer reported failure." |
💬 AutorestCore/Exception | "readme":"sql/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-composite-v5", "details":"> Loading AutoRest extension '@autorest/modelerfour' (4.15.456->4.15.456)" |
️️✔️
[Staging] PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
️️✔️
[Staging] SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️
[Staging] Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
[Call for Action] To better understand Azure service dev/test scenario, and support Azure service developer better on Swagger and REST API related tests in early phase, please help to fill in with this survey https://aka.ms/SurveyForEarlyPhase. It will take 5 to 10 minutes. If you already complete survey, please neglect this comment. Thanks. |
Swagger Generation Artifacts
|
NewApiVersionRequired reason: |
…01-preview_BackupShortTermRetention
Hi, @lululilliancoding your PR are labelled with WaitForARMFeedback. A notification email will be sent out shortly afterwards to notify ARM review board(armapireview@microsoft.com). cc @ |
Hi, @lululilliancoding your PR are labelled with WaitForARMFeedback. A notification email will be sent out shortly afterwards to notify ARM review board(armapireview@microsoft.com). cc @lmazuel |
The breaking change is an optional field. And it will not break exisitng cmdlet |
Hi, @lululilliancoding your PR are labelled with WaitForARMFeedback. A notification email will be sent out shortly afterwards to notify ARM review board(armapireview@microsoft.com). |
According to <https://dev.azure.com/msazure/AzureWiki/_wiki/wikis/AzureWiki.wiki/37684/Breaking-Changes>: |
https://msazure.visualstudio.com/One/_workitems/edit/10130746 ->Sent email and pinged the group azbreakchangereview@microsoft.com. |
@zhenglaizhang can you also help to merge this one? Thanks! |
For python, the breaking change is expected. |
…licies API Specification (#1763) Create to sync Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#14671 [ReCreate this PR](https://github.com/azure-resource-manager-schemas/compare/master...AzureSDKAutomation:sdkAuto/sql?expand=1)
…fication (Azure#14671) * Resume V2021-02-01-Preview BackupShortTermRetentionPolicies API Specification * Prettier check fix * comment Co-authored-by: Lillian Liu <liulu@microsoft.com>
…fication (Azure#14671) * Resume V2021-02-01-Preview BackupShortTermRetentionPolicies API Specification * Prettier check fix * comment Co-authored-by: Lillian Liu <liulu@microsoft.com>
MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.
Changelog
Please ensure to add changelog with this PR by answering the following questions.
We have Public Preview at around July 20th so we need to release the API Specification before 6/16.
Feature already deployed WW but is OFF on most Production regions controlled by a feature switch. For some reason, we will not turn it to ON before Public Preview. We plan to release .net sdk before Public Preview. When FS is Off and customer is using the new version of SDK, service will ignore the new parameter diffBackupIntervalInHours.
Before 6/16.
Contribution checklist:
If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.
ARM API Review Checklist
Ensure to check this box if one of the following scenarios meet updates in the PR, so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to involve ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs, all “removals” and “adding a new property” no more require ARM API review.
Please ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
Breaking Change Review Checklist
If there are following updates in the PR, ensure to request an approval from Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.
Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.