-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cost Management: Add typescript support and add more aggregation functions #14600
Cost Management: Add typescript support and add more aggregation functions #14600
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Rob Long <Robert.Long@lv.com>
Add Avg, Max and Min to set of available aggregation functions. Signed-off-by: Rob Long <Robert.Long@lv.com>
Hi, @bobalong79 Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips. Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vsswagger@microsoft.com |
[Call for Action] To better understand Azure service dev/test scenario, and support Azure service developer better on Swagger and REST API related tests in early phase, please help to fill in with this survey https://aka.ms/SurveyForEarlyPhase. It will take 5 to 10 minutes. If you already complete survey, please neglect this comment. Thanks. |
Swagger Validation Report
|
Rule | Message |
---|---|
R4005 - UniqueXmsEnumName |
Must not have duplicate name of x-ms-enum extension , make sure every x-ms-enum name unique. The duplicate x-ms-enum name: operatortype, path: $.ReportConfigComparisonExpression.properties.operator Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2019-11-01/costmanagement.exports.json#L672 |
R4011 - DeleteOperationResponses |
The delete operation is defined without a 200 or 204 error response implementation,please add it.' Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2019-11-01/costmanagement.exports.json#L256 |
R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat |
The integer type does not have a format, please add it. Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2019-11-01/costmanagement.json#L1004 |
R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat |
The integer type does not have a format, please add it. Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2019-11-01/costmanagement.json#L1086 |
R4018 - OperationsApiResponseSchema |
The response schema of operations API '/providers/Microsoft.CostManagement/operations' does not match the ARM specification. Please standardize the schema. Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2019-11-01/costmanagement.json#L1406 |
Since operation 'Dimensions_ByExternalCloudProviderType' response has model definition 'x-ms-pageable', it should be of the form '_list'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2019-11-01/costmanagement.json#L1042 |
|
Since operation 'Exports_GetExecutionHistory' response has model definition 'array', it should be of the form '_list'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2019-11-01/costmanagement.exports.json#L328 |
|
'GET' operation 'Dimensions_ByExternalCloudProviderType' should use method name 'Get' or Method name start with 'List'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2019-11-01/costmanagement.json#L1042 |
|
'PATCH' operation 'Alerts_Dismiss' should use method name 'Update'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2019-11-01/costmanagement.json#L654 |
|
The enum types should have x-ms-enum type extension set with appropriate options. Property name: direction Location: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2019-11-01/costmanagement.json#L1597 |
️️✔️
Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️
ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️
SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️
Cross-Version Breaking Changes succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️
CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
️️✔️
[Staging] SDK Track2 Validation succeeded [Detail]
- The following tags are being changed in this PR
|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"cost-management/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-2019-11",
"details":"> Installing AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.8.0)"|
|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"cost-management/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-2019-11",
"details":"> Installed AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.8.0->1.8.0)"|
The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:
Rule | Message |
---|---|
PreCheck/DuplicateSchema |
"readme":"cost-management/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2019-11", "details":"Duplicate Schema named QueryDataset -- properties.filter.$ref: undefined => "#/components/schemas/schemas:268" ; This error can be temporarily avoided by using the 'modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication' setting. NOTE: This setting will be removed in a future version of @autorest/modelerfour; schemas should be updated to fix this issue sooner than that." |
PreCheck/DuplicateSchema |
"readme":"cost-management/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2019-11", "details":"Duplicate Schema named QueryFilter -- properties.and.$ref: undefined => "#/components/schemas/schemas:269", properties.or.$ref: undefined => "#/components/schemas/schemas:270" ; This error can be temporarily avoided by using the 'modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication' setting. NOTE: This setting will be removed in a future version of @autorest/modelerfour; schemas should be updated to fix this issue sooner than that." |
AutorestCore/Exception |
"readme":"cost-management/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2019-11", "details":"Error: Plugin prechecker reported failure." |
💬 AutorestCore/Exception | "readme":"cost-management/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2019-11", "details":"> Loading AutoRest extension '@autorest/modelerfour' (4.15.456->4.15.456)" |
️️✔️
[Staging] PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
️️✔️
[Staging] SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️
[Staging] Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
Swagger Generation Artifacts
|
Thank you for your contribution bobalong79! We will review the pull request and get back to you soon. |
@bobalong79 please let me know when this is ready to merge |
Hi @ArcturusZhang please go ahead and merge it now as it's a prerequisite for Azure/azure-sdk-for-js#15469 Many thanks |
…tions (Azure#14600) * Add typescript support to Cost Management Signed-off-by: Rob Long <Robert.Long@lv.com> * Extend set of aggregation functions Add Avg, Max and Min to set of available aggregation functions. Signed-off-by: Rob Long <Robert.Long@lv.com>
MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.
Changelog
Please ensure to add changelog with this PR by answering the following questions.
Contribution checklist:
If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.
ARM API Review Checklist
Ensure to check this box if one of the following scenarios meet updates in the PR, so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to involve ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs, all “removals” and “adding a new property” no more require ARM API review.
Please ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
Breaking Change Review Checklist
If there are following updates in the PR, ensure to request an approval from Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.
Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.