Fixing s360 violations related to recommendedactions APIs #12951
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Hi, @dsgouda Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips. Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vsswagger@microsoft.com |
Swagger Validation Report
|
| Rule | Message |
|---|---|
| The child tracked resource, 'firewallRules' with immediate parent 'Server', must have a list by immediate parent operation. Location: Microsoft.DBforPostgreSQL/stable/2018-06-01/PerformanceRecommendations.json#L377 |
|
| The child tracked resource, 'virtualNetworkRules' with immediate parent 'Server', must have a list by immediate parent operation. Location: Microsoft.DBforPostgreSQL/stable/2018-06-01/PerformanceRecommendations.json#L377 |
|
| The child tracked resource, 'databases' with immediate parent 'Server', must have a list by immediate parent operation. Location: Microsoft.DBforPostgreSQL/stable/2018-06-01/PerformanceRecommendations.json#L377 |
|
| The child tracked resource, 'configurations' with immediate parent 'Server', must have a list by immediate parent operation. Location: Microsoft.DBforPostgreSQL/stable/2018-06-01/PerformanceRecommendations.json#L377 |
|
| The child tracked resource, 'securityAlertPolicies' with immediate parent 'Server', must have a list by immediate parent operation. Location: Microsoft.DBforPostgreSQL/stable/2018-06-01/PerformanceRecommendations.json#L377 |
|
| The child tracked resource, 'privateEndpointConnections' with immediate parent 'Server', must have a list by immediate parent operation. Location: Microsoft.DBforPostgreSQL/stable/2018-06-01/PerformanceRecommendations.json#L377 |
|
| The child tracked resource, 'privateLinkResources' with immediate parent 'Server', must have a list by immediate parent operation. Location: Microsoft.DBforPostgreSQL/stable/2018-06-01/PerformanceRecommendations.json#L377 |
|
| The child tracked resource, 'queryTexts' with immediate parent 'Server', must have a list by immediate parent operation. Location: Microsoft.DBforPostgreSQL/stable/2018-06-01/PerformanceRecommendations.json#L377 |
|
| The child tracked resource, 'topQueryStatistics' with immediate parent 'Server', must have a list by immediate parent operation. Location: Microsoft.DBforPostgreSQL/stable/2018-06-01/PerformanceRecommendations.json#L377 |
|
| The child tracked resource, 'waitStatistics' with immediate parent 'Server', must have a list by immediate parent operation. Location: Microsoft.DBforPostgreSQL/stable/2018-06-01/PerformanceRecommendations.json#L377 |
️⚠️Avocado: 1 Warnings warning [Detail]
| Rule | Message |
|---|---|
| The default tag contains multiple API versions swaggers. readme: specification/postgresql/resource-manager/readme.md tag: specification/postgresql/resource-manager/readme.md#tag-package-2020-01-01 |
️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️[Staging] Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on preview version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️[Staging] Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on stable version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
️⚠️[Staging] SDK Track2 Validation: 61 Warnings warning [Detail]
Only 10 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.
- The following tags are being changed in this PR
| Rule | Message |
|---|---|
| "readme":"postgresql/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2018-06-01", "details":"The schema 'ServerProperties' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'" |
|
| "readme":"postgresql/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2018-06-01", "details":"The schema 'StorageProfile' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'" |
|
| "readme":"postgresql/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2018-06-01", "details":"The schema 'ServerPropertiesForCreate' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'" |
|
| "readme":"postgresql/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2018-06-01", "details":"The schema 'ServerPropertiesForDefaultCreate' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'" |
|
| "readme":"postgresql/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2018-06-01", "details":"The schema 'ServerPropertiesForRestore' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'" |
|
| "readme":"postgresql/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2018-06-01", "details":"The schema 'ServerPropertiesForGeoRestore' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'" |
|
| "readme":"postgresql/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2018-06-01", "details":"The schema 'ServerPropertiesForReplica' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'" |
|
| "readme":"postgresql/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2018-06-01", "details":"The schema 'Sku' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'" |
|
| "readme":"postgresql/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2018-06-01", "details":"The schema 'Server' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'" |
|
| "readme":"postgresql/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2018-06-01", "details":"The schema 'ServerForCreate' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'" |
️️✔️[Staging] PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
️️✔️[Staging] SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
Swagger Generation Artifacts
|
This was referenced Feb 11, 2021
|
Hi @dsgouda, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of
|
openapi-pipeline-app
bot
added
CI-FixRequiredOnFailure
and removed
CI-FixRequiredOnFailure
labels
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s). |
openapi-pipeline-app
bot
added
CI-FixRequiredOnFailure
and removed
CI-FixRequiredOnFailure
labels
|
@dsgouda, can you fix the avacado error on missing son files referenced in readme.md? If they are old, you can remove the referenced tag and files. |
allenjzhang
reviewed
Feb 19, 2021
| "tags": [ | ||
| "RecommendedActionSessions" | ||
| ], | ||
| "operationId": "CreateRecommendedActionSession", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
=> Advisors_CreateRecommendedActionSession. BTW, how does user get the session/id back? The response is empty.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As of now the API does not return anything and is in prod, please refer to existing mirror APis in mariadb/mysql here
openapi-pipeline-app
bot
added
CI-FixRequiredOnFailure
and removed
CI-FixRequiredOnFailure
labels
openapi-pipeline-app
bot
added
CI-BreakingChange-Python
CI-FixRequiredOnFailure
and removed
CI-FixRequiredOnFailure
labels
|
For avacado validation errors, can you fix the first two items? Once 2 is fixed, the other unreferenced error should disappear.
|
openapi-pipeline-app
bot
added
CI-FixRequiredOnFailure
and removed
CI-FixRequiredOnFailure
labels
openapi-pipeline-app
bot
added
CI-FixRequiredOnFailure
and removed
CI-FixRequiredOnFailure
labels
allenjzhang
approved these changes
Feb 25, 2021
This was referenced Feb 25, 2021
mkarmark
pushed a commit
to mkarmark/azure-rest-api-specs
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 21, 2021
* Fixing s360 violations related to recommendedactions APIs * update the md file * fixing operation id * addressing pr comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.
Changelog
Please ensure to add changelog with this PR by answering the following questions.
Contribution checklist:
If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.
ARM API Review Checklist
Ensure to check this box if one of the following scenarios meet updates in the PR, so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to involve ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs, all “removals” and “adding a new property” no more require ARM API review.
Please ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
Breaking Change Review Checklist
If there are following updates in the PR, ensure to request an approval from Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.
Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.