-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.CostManagement to add version stable/2019-11-01 #12884
[Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.CostManagement to add version stable/2019-11-01 #12884
Conversation
Hi, @elabicha Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips. Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vsswagger@microsoft.com |
Swagger Validation Report
|
Rule | Message |
---|---|
1041 - AddedPropertyInResponse |
The new version has a new property 'tagKey' in response that was not found in the old version. New: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2019-11-01/costmanagement.json#L1469:7 Old: Microsoft.CostManagement/stable/2019-11-01/costmanagement.json#L1469:7 |
️️✔️
LintDiff succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for LintDiff.
️️✔️
Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️
ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️
SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️
[Staging] Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on preview version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️
[Staging] Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on stable version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️
CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
️❌
[Staging] SDK Track2 Validation: 3 Errors, 37 Warnings failed [Detail]
Only 10 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.
- The following tags are being changed in this PR
Rule | Message |
---|---|
PreCheck/DuplicateSchema |
"readme":"cost-management/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2019-11", "details":"Duplicate Schema named QueryDataset -- properties.filter.$ref: undefined => "#/components/schemas/schemas:243" ; This error can be temporarily avoided by using the 'modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication' setting. NOTE: This setting will be removed in a future version of @autorest/modelerfour; schemas should be updated to fix this issue sooner than that." |
PreCheck/DuplicateSchema |
"readme":"cost-management/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2019-11", "details":"Duplicate Schema named QueryFilter -- properties.and.$ref: undefined => "#/components/schemas/schemas:244", properties.or.$ref: undefined => "#/components/schemas/schemas:245" ; This error can be temporarily avoided by using the 'modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication' setting. NOTE: This setting will be removed in a future version of @autorest/modelerfour; schemas should be updated to fix this issue sooner than that." |
AutorestCore/Exception |
"readme":"cost-management/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2019-11", "details":"Error: Plugin prechecker reported failure." |
"readme":"cost-management/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2019-11", "details":"The schema 'ReportConfigDefinition' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'" |
|
"readme":"cost-management/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2019-11", "details":"The schema 'ReportConfigTimePeriod' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'" |
|
"readme":"cost-management/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2019-11", "details":"The schema 'ReportConfigDataset' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'" |
|
"readme":"cost-management/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2019-11", "details":"The schema 'ReportConfigDatasetConfiguration' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'" |
|
"readme":"cost-management/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2019-11", "details":"The schema 'ReportConfigAggregation' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'" |
|
"readme":"cost-management/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2019-11", "details":"The schema 'ReportConfigSorting' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'" |
|
"readme":"cost-management/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2019-11", "details":"The schema 'ReportConfigGrouping' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'" |
️️✔️
[Staging] PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
️️✔️
[Staging] SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
Swagger Generation Artifacts
|
In the Window Period to fix mismatches between swagger and service, when PR is labelled with “FixS360”, breaking change can be approved by PR assignee; the Azure Breaking Change Board is no longer required to approve the PR. Please ensure to clarify what s360 action items to be solved, and @ mention PR assignee for awareness. Please check this wiki [Window to Fix Broken]( Window to Fix Broken - Overview (azure.com)) for more details. |
Can you attach the s360 issue link? @elabicha |
/azp run unifiedPipeline |
No pipelines are associated with this pull request. |
…rsion stable/2019-11-01 (Azure#12884) * Adding tagValue and tagKey to ReportConfigFilter * remove the addition of tagValue
This is a PR generated at OpenAPI Hub. You can view your work branch via this link.
Changelog
Please ensure to add changelog with this PR by answering the following questions.
Contribution checklist:
If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.
ARM API Review Checklist
Ensure to check this box if one of the following scenarios meet updates in the PR, so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to involve ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs, all “removals” and “adding a new property” no more require ARM API review.
Please ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
Breaking Change Review Checklist
If there are following updates in the PR, ensure to request an approval from API Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.
Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.