Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ReleasePR servicefabric] Service Fabric - Add missing property recreateApplication to ApplicationUpgradePolicy #1808

Merged
1 commit merged into from
Jul 22, 2021

Conversation

openapi-sdkautomation[bot]
Copy link

Service Fabric - Add missing property recreateApplication to ApplicationUpgradePolicy (#15128)

* add missing property recreateApplication

* add recreateApplication to all missing api versions

* fix issue with cluster difinition AvoidAnonymousTypes

* ClusterVersions add default response

* add integer format

* more integer formats

* add type object

* more type object

* more type object

* more type object

* more type object 3

Co-authored-by: Alfredo Santamaria Gomez <alsantam@microsoft.com>
@ghost ghost added the automerge label Jul 22, 2021
Copy link

@ghost ghost left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This PR has been auto-approved by the @msftbot for the azure-resource-manager-schemas repo.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jul 22, 2021

Hello @msftbot[bot]!

Because this pull request has the automerge label, I will be glad to assist with helping to merge this pull request once all check-in policies pass.

Do note that I've been instructed to only help merge pull requests of this repository that have been opened for at least 1 minute. No worries though, I will be back when the time is right! 😉

p.s. you can customize the way I help with merging this pull request, such as holding this pull request until a specific person approves. Simply @mention me (@msftbot) and give me an instruction to get started! Learn more here.

This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants