Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue #416 - Link description in policy definitions for China #419

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jan 4, 2023
Merged

Issue #416 - Link description in policy definitions for China #419

merged 8 commits into from
Jan 4, 2023

Conversation

4pplied
Copy link
Contributor

@4pplied 4pplied commented Dec 21, 2022

Overview/Summary

Replaced link description as duplicate commercial cloud instead of one commercial, one for china

This PR fixes/adds/changes/removes

  1. Link definition in policy definitions module readme to go to mooncake parameters.
  2. Fixes 🪲 Bug - Incorrect link description in Wiki page for Policy Definitions #416 & AB#25662

Breaking Changes

  1. N/A

Testing Evidence

N/A

As part of this Pull Request I have

@ghost ghost added the Needs: Triage 🔍 Needs triaging by the team label Dec 21, 2022
jfaurskov
jfaurskov previously approved these changes Dec 21, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@jfaurskov jfaurskov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jtracey93 jtracey93 added documentation and removed Needs: Triage 🔍 Needs triaging by the team labels Dec 21, 2022
Copy link
Collaborator

@jtracey93 jtracey93 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@4pplied
Copy link
Contributor Author

4pplied commented Dec 21, 2022

Thanks @JamJarchitect I found a couple of other instances of this bug to change:

Now it get's interesting!

  • roleAssignments uses the same Bicep module for both Commercial and China from the looks of things. I will amend the parameter link to say `Link to parameters' or something to that effect with mentioning default Mooncake parameters.
  • The policy/assignments/alzDefaults has parameter files for china, but not a separate module. I'll do the same as above and mention that default Mooncake parameters are available too.

Thoughts @jtracey93 ?

@ghost ghost removed the Needs: Author Feedback label Dec 21, 2022
@4pplied
Copy link
Contributor Author

4pplied commented Dec 22, 2022

Thanks @JamJarchitect I found a couple of other instances of this bug to change:

Now it get's interesting!

  • roleAssignments uses the same Bicep module for both Commercial and China from the looks of things. I will amend the parameter link to say `Link to parameters' or something to that effect with mentioning default Mooncake parameters.
  • The policy/assignments/alzDefaults has parameter files for china, but not a separate module. I'll do the same as above and mention that default Mooncake parameters are available too.

Thoughts @jtracey93 ?

Separate module for Mooncake exists mc-alzDefaultPolicyAssignments so I've amended the parameter link description to reflect accordingly!

@jtracey93
Copy link
Collaborator

@JamJarchitect is this good for re-review?

@4pplied
Copy link
Contributor Author

4pplied commented Dec 22, 2022

@JamJarchitect is this good for re-review?

I'm just debating a last couple of bits.

I'm think to put a note in each of the parameters section just stating that the module CAN be used in Mooncake, but there is no dedicated module for it, but we have example parameters in the folder - it'll just clear up any confusion.

Thoughts?

@jtracey93
Copy link
Collaborator

jtracey93 commented Dec 22, 2022 via email

@4pplied
Copy link
Contributor Author

4pplied commented Dec 22, 2022

Sounds good

Should be ready for review now. Updated the links to the markdowns appropriately and put a note in about the modules and Azure China

@4pplied
Copy link
Contributor Author

4pplied commented Jan 3, 2023

/azp run validateazcloud

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

Copy link
Collaborator

@jtracey93 jtracey93 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jtracey93
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run validateazcloud

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@jtracey93 jtracey93 merged commit 0f54bc5 into Azure:main Jan 4, 2023
@4pplied 4pplied deleted the policydeflink branch January 10, 2023 10:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

🪲 Bug - Incorrect link description in Wiki page for Policy Definitions
3 participants