Tooling: Add support for bundled jq version in dev environment check

[tbradsha]

As of macOS 10.15, jq is included. The version is 1.6-159-apple-gcff5336-dirty, which would be parsed as being less than 1.6, and thus fails dev environment checks. That said, the referenced commit is from 2022, so in reality it's newer than 1.6:

jqlang/jq@cff5336

I'm not even sure why the check requires 1.6 (it might be arbitrary), but this PR should at least let people proceed with the version they have.

Other information:

• Have you written new tests for your changes, if applicable?
• Have you checked the E2E test CI results, and verified that your changes do not break them?
• Have you tested your changes on WordPress.com, if applicable (if so, you'll see a generated comment below with a script to run)?

Jetpack product discussion

Does this pull request change what data or activity we track or use?

Testing instructions:

On a Mac without jq installed manually (or at least added in the path), run tools/check-development-environment.sh.

[github-actions]

Thank you for your PR!

When contributing to Jetpack, we have a few suggestions that can help us test and review your patch:

• ✅ Include a description of your PR changes.
  
• ✅ Add a "[Status]" label (In Progress, Needs Team Review, ...).
  
• ✅ Add a "[Type]" label (Bug, Enhancement, Janitorial, Task).
  
• ✅ Add testing instructions.
  
• ✅ Specify whether this PR includes any changes to data or privacy.
  
• ✅ Add changelog entries to affected projects
  

This comment will be updated as you work on your PR and make changes. If you think that some of those checks are not needed for your PR, please explain why you think so. Thanks for cooperation 🤖

---

The e2e test report can be found here. Please note that it can take a few minutes after the e2e tests checks are complete for the report to be available.

---

Follow this PR Review Process:

1. Ensure all required checks appearing at the bottom of this PR are passing.
2. Choose a review path based on your changes:
   • A. Team Review: add the "[Status] Needs Team Review" label
     • For most changes, including minor cross-team impacts.
     • Example: Updating a team-specific component or a small change to a shared library.
   • B. Crew Review: add the "[Status] Needs Review" label
     • For significant changes to core functionality.
     • Example: Major updates to a shared library or complex features.
   • C. Both: Start with Team, then request Crew
     • For complex changes or when you need extra confidence.
     • Example: Refactor affecting multiple systems.
3. Get at least one approval before merging.

Still unsure? Reach out in #jetpack-developers for guidance!

[kraftbj]

➜ jq --version && ./tools/check-development-environment.sh
jq-1.6-159-apple-gcff5336-dirty
Jetpack development environment check
=====================================

Monorepo path: /Users/kraft/code/jetpack

Shell tools
===========

* Usable version of bash                   ... ok (version 5.2.37(1)-release)
* Standard tools are available             ... yes
* If sed accepts -E                        ... yes
* Usable version of jq                     ... ok (version 1.6-159-apple-gcff5336-dirty)

[anomiex]

I'm not even sure why the check requires 1.6 (it might be arbitrary)

Probably semi-arbitrary, in that it was the current version when 5f9ce13 added the version check.

I see 1.7 was released since. I wonder how long until we accidentally use a new-in-1.7 feature in a script that's used outside of CI. 😅

[tbradsha]

Yeah, and it somewhat pains me to add a specific check like the one in this script, but I think the benefits of not forcing a dependency install make it worth it for now.