Lock file maintenance #26716
Merged
Lock file maintenance #26716
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
matticbot
added
[Status] Needs Review
github-actions
bot
added
[Plugin] Backup
|
Are you an Automattician? You can now test your Pull Request on WordPress.com. On your sandbox, run |
anomiex
added
[Status] Blocked / Hold
and removed
[Status] Needs Review
|
We're going to look at this on Wednesday as a team learn-up |
matticbot
force-pushed
the
renovate/lock-file-maintenance
branch
from
cf423fd to
4b2787c
Compare
matticbot
force-pushed
the
renovate/lock-file-maintenance
branch
from
4b2787c to
977078a
Compare
anomiex
previously approved these changes
Oct 12, 2022
anomiex
approved these changes
Oct 12, 2022
anomiex
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2024
A change in some tooling (babel? terser?) seems to have broken one of the fixes recommended in the package's docs, so stop recommending that fix. It's something in #26716, according to `git bisect`, but I couldn't figure out what in there specifically changed.
anomiex
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2024
A change in some tooling (babel? terser?) seems to have broken one of the fixes recommended in the package's docs, so stop recommending that fix. It's something in #26716, according to `git bisect`, but I couldn't figure out what in there specifically changed.
3 tasks
anomiex
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2024
A change in some tooling (babel? terser?) seems to have broken one of the fixes recommended in the package's docs, so stop recommending that fix. It's something in #26716, according to `git bisect`, but I couldn't figure out what in there specifically changed.
spsiddarthan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 15, 2024
A change in some tooling (babel? terser?) seems to have broken one of the fixes recommended in the package's docs, so stop recommending that fix. It's something in #26716, according to `git bisect`, but I couldn't figure out what in there specifically changed.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR contains the following updates:
🔧 This Pull Request updates lock files to use the latest dependency versions.
Configuration
📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 3:00 am on Monday on the 7th through 13th day of the month" in timezone UTC, Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).
🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.
This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.