Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Exclude run() methods in schedule tests when evaluating code coverage. #209

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 15, 2023

Conversation

Anders429
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@Anders429 Anders429 added C - Testing Category: Verifying the correctness of code. P - Low Priority: Not particularly urgent. A - Scheduling Area: Parallel scheduling of systems. labels Apr 15, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 15, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #209 (f8bc560) into dev (cb3a526) will increase coverage by 1.53%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev     #209      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   95.40%   96.94%   +1.53%     
==========================================
  Files          89       89              
  Lines       14115    14142      +27     
==========================================
+ Hits        13467    13710     +243     
+ Misses        648      432     -216     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/lib.rs 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/system/schedule/mod.rs 100.00% <100.00%> (+25.99%) ⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@Anders429 Anders429 merged commit dc391f7 into dev Apr 15, 2023
@Anders429 Anders429 deleted the cov branch April 15, 2023 02:59
@Anders429 Anders429 added this to the 0.9.0 milestone Apr 18, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A - Scheduling Area: Parallel scheduling of systems. C - Testing Category: Verifying the correctness of code. P - Low Priority: Not particularly urgent.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant