Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Update CI configuration for PyPy compatibility #47

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

anandgupta42
Copy link
Contributor

@anandgupta42 anandgupta42 commented Jan 9, 2025

  • Add proper GitHub Actions workflow configuration
  • Simplify tox configuration
  • Add explicit PyPy support
  • Fix dependency installation issues

Important

Update CI configuration for PyPy compatibility and improve code formatting and testing setup.

  • CI Configuration:
    • Added .github/workflows/ci.yml for GitHub Actions to run tests on multiple OS and Python versions, including PyPy 3.9 and 3.10.
    • Updated tox.ini to simplify environment definitions and add PyPy support.
  • Code Formatting:
    • Applied consistent formatting to long strings in check_macro_args_have_desc.py, check_macro_has_desc.py, and other files.
    • Reformatted import statements in setup.py and test_utils.py.
  • Miscellaneous:
    • Added setup.cfg for flake8 configuration.
    • Fixed minor typos and improved code readability in various files.

This description was created by Ellipsis for 73bf269. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.

- Add proper GitHub Actions workflow configuration
- Simplify tox configuration
- Add explicit PyPy support
- Fix dependency installation issues
Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to c471156 in 16 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 128 lines of code in 2 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 2 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .github/workflows/ci.yml:28
  • Draft comment:
    Add a newline at the end of the file for POSIX compliance.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 10%
    The CI configuration is missing a newline at the end of the file, which is a best practice for POSIX compliance.
2. tox.ini:33
  • Draft comment:
    Add a newline at the end of the file for POSIX compliance.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 10%
    The tox configuration is missing a newline at the end of the file, which is a best practice for POSIX compliance.

Workflow ID: wflow_xB51BbVEFlTVcImN


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

- Add matrix strategy for all Python versions
- Include all operating systems
- Restore check and docs jobs
- Fix PyPy configuration
Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 8835e6a in 37 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 85 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .github/workflows/ci.yml:41
  • Draft comment:
    Setting multiple Python versions in a single job can lead to unexpected behavior. Consider setting only one version per job run.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
    The comment appears to misunderstand the setup. This is a standard tox testing setup where multiple Python versions are installed to run the test matrix. The TOXENV environment variable is set from matrix.tox-env, and tox-gh-actions will handle selecting the appropriate Python version for each test run. This is actually the recommended way to set up Python testing with tox in GitHub Actions.
    Maybe there could be some overhead from installing multiple Python versions when only one is needed for each specific test run?
    The slight overhead of installing multiple versions is outweighed by the benefits of having a single job definition that handles all test combinations, making the workflow more maintainable.
    The comment should be deleted as it raises a false concern. The multiple Python version setup is intentional and correct for this tox-based testing workflow.

Workflow ID: wflow_ojlBhtrrlhvNazaF


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

- Map each tox environment to specific Python version
- Add proper matrix includes
- Improve error reporting with verbose tox output
- Fix dependency installation steps
Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 0ff8179 in 39 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 97 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .github/workflows/ci.yml:34
  • Draft comment:
    The include section under matrix is redundant since all the environments are already listed in the tox-env array. Consider removing the include section to simplify the configuration.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
    The comment suggests removing the include section because it lists the same environments, but this misses the crucial point that the include section adds the python-version mapping that's needed for the workflow to function. Without this mapping, the workflow wouldn't know which Python version to use for each tox environment. The include section serves an essential purpose.
    Could there be a simpler way to map tox environments to Python versions that I'm not seeing? Maybe there's a tox feature that makes this mapping unnecessary?
    While there might be other ways to handle the version mapping, the current approach using matrix.include is a standard GitHub Actions pattern and clearly shows the relationship between tox environments and Python versions.
    The comment should be deleted because it's incorrect - the include section serves a necessary purpose by mapping tox environments to their corresponding Python versions.

Workflow ID: wflow_qFGHgYdWFAIuZTb8


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on aee1fa4 in 19 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 182 lines of code in 2 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .github/workflows/ci.yml:35
  • Draft comment:
    The --skip-missing-interpreters false option is redundant since skip_missing_interpreters = true is already set in tox.ini. Consider removing it for clarity.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 50%
    The --skip-missing-interpreters false option in the tox command is redundant because the tox.ini file already has skip_missing_interpreters = true. This redundancy should be removed for clarity and to avoid confusion.

Workflow ID: wflow_P0okNJTow1SuYN16


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

- Install gettext using Homebrew on macOS runners
- Force link gettext to resolve library dependency
- Conditional execution only on macOS
Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on c377c5c in 52 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 18 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .github/workflows/ci.yml:27
  • Draft comment:
    Using brew link gettext --force can overwrite existing symlinks, which is not ideal. Consider using brew link --overwrite gettext instead.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
    The comment is about changed code. While technically correct that '--overwrite' is an alternative, '--force' is a commonly used and valid option. The difference between them is minor, and both would work. The current solution with '--force' is not wrong or problematic.
    The comment might be pointing out a real best practice for Homebrew that I'm not aware of. There could be subtle differences between '--force' and '--overwrite' that matter in CI environments.
    While there might be subtle differences, the current solution with '--force' is well-established and commonly used. The suggested change doesn't provide significant benefits to justify a code change.
    Delete the comment because it suggests an alternative that isn't clearly better than the current valid solution.

Workflow ID: wflow_NSMOfkiTG906uvGN


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on d069284 in 11 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 49 lines of code in 2 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .github/workflows/ci.yml:24
  • Draft comment:
    Consider adding a comment or note explaining why PyPy 3.8 support is being removed, as this could impact users relying on that version. This applies to both the CI configuration and the tox environment list.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 50%
    The removal of PyPy 3.8 from the CI configuration and tox environment list is consistent across both files. However, the reason for this removal is not documented in the PR description. It would be beneficial to include a comment or note explaining why PyPy 3.8 support is being dropped, as this could impact users relying on that version.

Workflow ID: wflow_MCjy7HXK9HVgSZUY


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 73bf269 in 1 minute and 13 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 558 lines of code in 23 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. src/datapilot/core/platforms/dbt/utils.py:265
  • Draft comment:
    The get_hard_coded_references function should identify hard-coded references like schema.table1, not templated references like {{ var('schema.table') }}. Please ensure the function and its test cases are aligned with this purpose.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful.

Workflow ID: wflow_DCNEu28GuNy59F3g


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant