Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix CompletionPolicy for BookkeepingQualitySink #2465

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 30, 2024

Conversation

knopers8
Copy link
Collaborator

A label for matching the correct CompletionPolicy in BookkeepingQualitySink was missing. This was causing it to wait indefinitely for matching inputs for the same timeslice if QOs from different Data Processors were requested. The change allows BookkeepingQualitySink to consume the inputs immediatelly and pass them to any other process which may also need them.

A label for matching the correct CompletionPolicy in BookkeepingQualitySink was missing. This was causing it to wait indefinitely for matching inputs for the same timeslice if QOs from different Data Processors were requested.
The change allows BookkeepingQualitySink to consume the inputs immediatelly and pass them to any other process which may also need them.
Copy link
Collaborator

@justonedev1 justonedev1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thank you

@knopers8
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The command below with the provided configuration file reproduces the issue observed by Robert. With this fix, the reproducer behaves OK.

o2-qc-run-producer | o2-qc --config json://home/pkonopka/alice/QualityControl/Framework/basic.json

basic.json

@knopers8 knopers8 enabled auto-merge (squash) October 30, 2024 10:19
@knopers8 knopers8 merged commit e1052ca into AliceO2Group:master Oct 30, 2024
7 checks passed
@knopers8 knopers8 deleted the fix-sync-bkp branch October 30, 2024 12:51
Barthelemy pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2024
A label for matching the correct CompletionPolicy in BookkeepingQualitySink was missing. This was causing it to wait indefinitely for matching inputs for the same timeslice if QOs from different Data Processors were requested.
The change allows BookkeepingQualitySink to consume the inputs immediatelly and pass them to any other process which may also need them.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants