Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ACS-7389][ADF] Break Viewer dependency on Material Module #9631

Merged

Conversation

tamaragruszka
Copy link
Contributor

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

  • The commit message follows our guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check one with "x")

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • Documentation
  • Other... Please describe:

What is the current behaviour? (You can also link to an open issue here)
https://hyland.atlassian.net/browse/ACS-7389

What is the new behaviour?
Removed material module dependency, all components of viewer are standalone

Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one with "x")

  • Yes
  • No

If this PR contains a breaking change, please describe the impact and migration path for existing applications: ...

Other information:

@DenysVuika
Copy link
Contributor

needs rebase

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented May 9, 2024

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
1 Security Hotspot
4.9% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 3%)
B Reliability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarLint

@DenysVuika DenysVuika merged commit 0414fa7 into develop May 9, 2024
32 of 33 checks passed
@DenysVuika DenysVuika deleted the ACS-7389-ADF-Break-Viewer-dependency-on-Material-Module branch May 9, 2024 17:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants