Feature: PR Size to Time dependency #50
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request enhance the functionality of pull request statistics and visualizations within the project. Key modifications include the introduction of a new Changes
Poem
Warning Tool Failures:Tool Failure Count:Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
src/view/utils/createTimelineMonthComparisonChart.ts (1)
28-36: Consider refactoring for better maintainability and error handling.The current implementation could be improved in several ways:
- Extract the chart creation logic into a separate function for better readability
- Add error handling for chart creation failures
Consider this refactoring:
- [ - createTimelineMonthsXYChart( - data, - type as StatsType, - dates.filter((date) => date !== "total"), - user - ), - createSizeDependencyXYChart(data, type as StatsType, user), - ].join("\n") + const createCharts = (type: StatsType, user: string) => { + try { + const timelineChart = createTimelineMonthsXYChart( + data, + type, + dates.filter((date) => date !== "total"), + user + ); + const sizeChart = createSizeDependencyXYChart(data, type, user); + return [timelineChart, sizeChart].join("\n"); + } catch (error) { + console.error(`Failed to create charts for user ${user}:`, error); + return ""; + } + }; + createCharts(type as StatsType, user)src/view/utils/createSizeDependencyXYChart.ts (2)
1-5: Consider moving size categories to a configuration file.The hardcoded
sizesarray could be moved to a central configuration file to improve maintainability and ensure consistency across the codebase.-const sizes = ["xs", "s", "m", "l", "xl"]; +import { PR_SIZE_CATEGORIES } from "../../config/constants";
7-11: Improve type safety with dedicated interfaces.The nested Record type makes the code harder to understand and maintain. Consider creating dedicated interfaces for the data structure.
interface PullRequestStats { total?: { sizes?: { [size: string]: { [type in StatsType]: { timeToReview: number; timeToApprove: number; timeToMerge: number; }; }; }; }; } interface ChartData { [user: string]: PullRequestStats; } export const createSizeDependencyXYChart = ( data: ChartData, type: StatsType, user: string ) => {src/converters/types.ts (2)
81-103: Consider extracting nested types for better maintainability and reuse.The new
sizesproperty introduces complex nested types that could be reused elsewhere. Consider extracting these into separate type definitions.Here's a suggested refactoring:
+type TimeMetrics = { + timeToApprove: number; + timeToReview: number; + timeToMerge: number; +}; +type SizeTimeStats = { + timeToApprove: number[]; + timeToReview: number[]; + timeToMerge: number[]; + percentile: Partial<TimeMetrics>; + average: Partial<TimeMetrics>; + median: Partial<TimeMetrics>; +}; export type Collection = { // ... other properties ... - sizes?: Record< - string, - { - timeToApprove: number[]; - timeToReview: number[]; - timeToMerge: number[]; - percentile: { - timeToApprove?: number; - timeToReview?: number; - timeToMerge?: number; - }; - average: { - timeToApprove?: number; - timeToReview?: number; - timeToMerge?: number; - }; - median: { - timeToApprove?: number; - timeToReview?: number; - timeToMerge?: number; - }; - } - >; + sizes?: Record<string, SizeTimeStats>;This refactoring:
- Improves code reusability
- Reduces duplication
- Makes the type structure more maintainable
- Uses
Partial<T>for optional fields
81-103: Add JSDoc comments to document the new property.The new
sizesproperty would benefit from documentation explaining its purpose and structure.Add JSDoc comments like this:
export type Collection = { // ... other properties ... + /** + * Aggregated time metrics grouped by pull request size. + * Each size category (XS, S, M, L, XL) contains arrays of raw timing data + * and computed statistics (percentile, average, median). + */ sizes?: Record<string, { // ... rest of the type definition }>;src/converters/utils/preparePullRequestStats.ts (1)
37-60: Add helper function to reduce code duplication.The calculation pattern for percentile, median, and average is repeated for each time metric.
Consider extracting the calculations into a helper function:
function calculateTimeMetrics(data: { timeToReview?: number[], timeToApprove?: number[], timeToMerge?: number[] }) { return { percentile: { timeToReview: calcPercentileValue(data?.timeToReview), timeToApprove: calcPercentileValue(data?.timeToApprove), timeToMerge: calcPercentileValue(data?.timeToMerge), }, median: { timeToReview: calcMedianValue(data?.timeToReview), timeToApprove: calcMedianValue(data?.timeToApprove), timeToMerge: calcMedianValue(data?.timeToMerge), }, average: { timeToReview: calcAverageValue(data?.timeToReview), timeToApprove: calcAverageValue(data?.timeToApprove), timeToMerge: calcAverageValue(data?.timeToMerge), }, }; }Then use it in the main function:
sizes: Object.fromEntries( Object.entries(collection?.sizes || {}).map(([size, data]) => [ size, { ...data, ...calculateTimeMetrics(data) }, ]) ),🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 39-39: Avoid the use of spread (
...) syntax on accumulators.Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
build/index.js (2)
3640-3642: Ensure all imports are used or remove unused importsThe imported module
_1on line 3640 does not appear to be used in the code. Unused imports can clutter the codebase and may lead to confusion.Consider removing the unused import:
-const _1 = __nccwpck_require__(92884); const utils_1 = __nccwpck_require__(41002); const createContributionMonthXYChart_1 = __nccwpck_require__(78462);
3649-3652: Optimize nested loops to improve performanceThe current implementation uses multiple nested
filter,map, andreduceoperations, which may affect performance with large datasets. Refactoring the code to minimize the number of iterations can enhance efficiency.Consider refactoring as follows:
- .map((type) => [ - (0, createTimelineMonthXYChart_1.createTimelineMonthsXYChart)(data, type, dates.filter((date) => date !== "total"), user), - (0, createSizeDependencyXYChart_1.createSizeDependencyXYChart)(data, type, user), - ].join("\n")) + .forEach((type) => { + charts.push( + (0, createTimelineMonthXYChart_1.createTimelineMonthsXYChart)(data, type, dates.filter((date) => date !== "total"), user), + (0, createSizeDependencyXYChart_1.createSizeDependencyXYChart)(data, type, user) + ); + });This reduces the number of intermediate arrays created and may improve performance.
src/converters/utils/preparePullRequestTimeline.ts (2)
96-115: Refactor repetitive code for updating time arraysThe code block that updates time arrays (
timeToReview,timeToApprove,timeToMerge,timeToReviewRequest,timeInDraft) repeats the same pattern multiple times. This repetition can make the code harder to maintain and more prone to errors. Consider abstracting this logic into a helper function to improve readability and reduce duplication.Apply this refactor:
// Define a helper function function updateTimeArray( originalArray: number[] | undefined, newValue: number | null | undefined ): number[] | undefined { return typeof newValue === "number" ? [...(originalArray || []), newValue] : originalArray; } // Use the helper function in the return statement return { ...collection, timeToReview: updateTimeArray(collection.timeToReview, timeToReview), timeToApprove: updateTimeArray(collection.timeToApprove, timeToApprove), timeToMerge: updateTimeArray(collection.timeToMerge, timeToMerge), timeToReviewRequest: updateTimeArray(collection.timeToReviewRequest, timeToReviewRequest), timeInDraft: updateTimeArray(collection.timeInDraft, timeInDraft), // ... rest of the code };
118-175: Simplify nested structures to enhance readabilityThe nested structures within the
sizesobject are complex and can be difficult to read and maintain. Consider refactoring this code to reduce nesting and improve clarity. This can be achieved by extracting some logic into helper functions or restructuring the data manipulation.Example refactor:
- Extract the size key calculation:
const prSize = getPullRequestSize( pullRequestInfo?.additions, pullRequestInfo?.deletions );
- Extract or map the times into a separate object:
const sizeTimes = ['timeToApprove', 'timeToReview', 'timeToMerge'].reduce( (acc, key) => { const timeValue = { timeToApprove, timeToReview, timeToMerge }[key]; if (timeValue) { acc[key] = [ ...(collection?.sizes?.[prSize]?.[key] || []), timeValue, ]; } else { acc[key] = collection?.sizes?.[prSize]?.[key]; } return acc; }, {} as Record<string, number[] | undefined> );
- Update the
sizesproperty:sizes: { ...(collection.sizes || {}), [prSize]: { ...(collection.sizes?.[prSize] || {}), ...sizeTimes, }, },This refactor reduces repetition and makes the code easier to understand.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
build/index.js(5 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)src/converters/types.ts(1 hunks)src/converters/utils/preparePullRequestStats.ts(1 hunks)src/converters/utils/preparePullRequestTimeline.ts(2 hunks)src/view/utils/createSizeDependencyXYChart.ts(1 hunks)src/view/utils/createTimelineMonthComparisonChart.ts(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- package.json
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (5)
src/converters/types.ts (1)
Pattern **/*.ts: Check algorithms and propose the best options
src/converters/utils/preparePullRequestStats.ts (1)
Pattern **/*.ts: Check algorithms and propose the best options
src/converters/utils/preparePullRequestTimeline.ts (1)
Pattern **/*.ts: Check algorithms and propose the best options
src/view/utils/createSizeDependencyXYChart.ts (1)
Pattern **/*.ts: Check algorithms and propose the best options
src/view/utils/createTimelineMonthComparisonChart.ts (1)
Pattern **/*.ts: Check algorithms and propose the best options
🪛 Biome
src/converters/utils/preparePullRequestStats.ts
[error] 39-39: Avoid the use of spread (...) syntax on accumulators.
Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in .reduce) because it causes a time complexity of O(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.
(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/view/utils/createTimelineMonthComparisonChart.ts (2)
5-5: LGTM: Import statement is correctly placed and follows conventions.
28-36: Verify the performance impact of generating multiple charts.
The addition of size dependency charts doubles the chart generation workload. Let's verify the performance impact.
src/converters/utils/preparePullRequestStats.ts (1)
37-60: Verify the statistical calculations for PR sizes.
Since this is a new feature for PR size to time dependency visualization, we should verify that the statistical calculations are working as expected.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the statistical calculation functions.
Let me check the implementation of these statistical functions to ensure they're correctly implemented.
Statistical calculations for PR sizes are correctly implemented
The statistical functions are properly implemented with appropriate safeguards:
calcPercentileValue: Correctly implements weighted percentile calculation using the configured percentile valuecalcMedianValue: Properly handles both odd and even-length arrays with correct median calculationcalcAverageValue: Correctly implements arithmetic mean with proper null checks
The calculations are being consistently applied across all time metrics (review, approve, merge) for each PR size category.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for test files covering these statistical calculations
echo "Searching for test coverage of statistical calculations..."
rg -l "calcPercentileValue|calcMedianValue|calcAverageValue" --type ts --glob "*test*"
# Look for existing size-related calculations
echo "Checking for existing size-related calculations..."
rg "sizes?\." --type ts -A 3
Length of output: 1852
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the implementation of statistical calculation functions
echo "Searching for statistical calculation functions..."
ast-grep --pattern 'function calc$_Value($_) { $$$ }'
# Search for any test files that might have been missed
echo "Searching for test files..."
fd -e test.ts -e spec.ts
# Look for any usage of these calculations in the codebase
echo "Searching for usage of calculations..."
rg "calc(Percentile|Median|Average)Value" -A 2
Length of output: 15421
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the implementation of statistical calculation functions
echo "Checking calcPercentileValue implementation..."
cat src/converters/utils/calculations/calcPercentileValue.ts
echo "Checking calcMedianValue implementation..."
cat src/converters/utils/calculations/calcMedianValue.ts
echo "Checking calcAverageValue implementation..."
cat src/converters/utils/calculations/calcAverageValue.ts
Length of output: 1618
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 39-39: Avoid the use of spread (...) syntax on accumulators.
Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in .reduce) because it causes a time complexity of O(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.
(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
build/index.js (1)
3468-3505: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add input validation and error handling in createSizeDependencyXYChart
The createSizeDependencyXYChart function lacks input validation for the parameters data, type, and user. If any of these are undefined or null, it could cause runtime errors. Additionally, the function assumes that certain nested properties exist within data, which may not always be the case.
Consider adding checks at the beginning of the function:
const createSizeDependencyXYChart = (data, type, user) => {
+ if (!data || !type || !user) {
+ throw new Error('Invalid input parameters for createSizeDependencyXYChart');
+ }
+
+ const userData = data[user]?.total?.sizes;
+ if (!userData) {
+ return ''; // Or handle accordingly if data is missing
+ }
+
return (0, createXYChart_1.createXYChart)({
// Existing code...
});
};Likely invalid or redundant comment.
src/converters/utils/preparePullRequestTimeline.ts (1)
96-175: Ensure type safety and handle undefined values appropriately
Throughout the code, optional chaining (?.) is used extensively, which is good for handling undefined values. However, ensure that the rest of the code correctly handles potential undefined results, especially when performing operations like spreading arrays or adding to them.
Consider verifying that all properties used after optional chaining are correctly accounted for, and that any undefined values won't cause runtime errors.
| export const createSizeDependencyXYChart = ( | ||
| data: Record<string, Record<string, Collection>>, | ||
| type: StatsType, | ||
| user: string | ||
| ) => { | ||
| return createXYChart({ | ||
| title: `Pull request's size dependency timeline(${ | ||
| type === "percentile" ? parseInt(getValueAsIs("PERCENTILE")) : "" | ||
| }${type === "percentile" ? "th " : ""}${type}) ${user}`, | ||
| xAxis: sizes, | ||
| yAxis: { | ||
| min: 0, | ||
| max: Math.ceil( | ||
| Math.max( | ||
| ...sizes.map((size) => | ||
| Math.max( | ||
| ...["timeToReview", "timeToApprove", "timeToMerge"].map( | ||
| (key) => | ||
| data[user]?.total?.sizes?.[size]?.[type]?.[ | ||
| key as "timeToReview" | "timeToApprove" | "timeToMerge" | ||
| ] || 0 | ||
| ) | ||
| ) | ||
| ), | ||
| 1 | ||
| ) / 60 | ||
| ), | ||
| title: "hours", | ||
| }, | ||
| lines: [ | ||
| { | ||
| color: "gold", | ||
| name: "Time\\ To\\ Review", | ||
| values: sizes.map( | ||
| (size) => | ||
| Math.round( | ||
| ((data[user]?.total?.sizes?.[size]?.[type]?.timeToReview || 0) / | ||
| 60) * | ||
| 100 | ||
| ) / 100 | ||
| ), | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| color: "chartreuse", | ||
| name: "Time\\ To\\ Approve", | ||
| values: sizes.map( | ||
| (size) => | ||
| Math.round( | ||
| ((data[user]?.total?.sizes?.[size]?.[type]?.timeToApprove || 0) / | ||
| 60) * | ||
| 100 | ||
| ) / 100 | ||
| ), | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| color: "blueviolet", | ||
| name: "Time\\ To\\ Merge", | ||
| values: sizes.map( | ||
| (size) => | ||
| Math.round( | ||
| ((data[user]?.total?.sizes?.[size]?.[type]?.timeToMerge || 0) / | ||
| 60) * | ||
| 100 | ||
| ) / 100 | ||
| ), | ||
| }, | ||
| ], | ||
| }); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add unit tests for the chart generation logic.
This new functionality lacks test coverage. Consider adding tests for:
- Chart configuration generation
- Time conversion calculations
- Edge cases with missing or invalid data
- Different combinations of stats types and user data
Would you like me to help create a test suite for this functionality?
| max: Math.ceil( | ||
| Math.max( | ||
| ...sizes.map((size) => | ||
| Math.max( | ||
| ...["timeToReview", "timeToApprove", "timeToMerge"].map( | ||
| (key) => | ||
| data[user]?.total?.sizes?.[size]?.[type]?.[ | ||
| key as "timeToReview" | "timeToApprove" | "timeToMerge" | ||
| ] || 0 | ||
| ) | ||
| ) | ||
| ), | ||
| 1 | ||
| ) / 60 | ||
| ), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify max value calculation and document time conversions.
The max value calculation is complex and uses magic numbers. Consider:
- Extracting the time conversion logic to a utility function
- Using named constants for magic numbers
- Adding comments to explain the calculation
+const SECONDS_TO_HOURS = 60;
+const MIN_CHART_HOURS = 1;
+
+const convertSecondsToHours = (seconds: number): number => seconds / SECONDS_TO_HOURS;
+
+const getMaxTimeValue = (
+ data: ChartData,
+ user: string,
+ type: StatsType
+): number => {
+ const timeKeys = ["timeToReview", "timeToApprove", "timeToMerge"] as const;
+ const maxSeconds = Math.max(
+ ...sizes.map((size) =>
+ Math.max(...timeKeys.map((key) => data[user]?.total?.sizes?.[size]?.[type]?.[key] || 0))
+ ),
+ MIN_CHART_HOURS * SECONDS_TO_HOURS
+ );
+ return Math.ceil(convertSecondsToHours(maxSeconds));
+};
yAxis: {
min: 0,
- max: Math.ceil(
- Math.max(
- ...sizes.map((size) =>
- Math.max(
- ...["timeToReview", "timeToApprove", "timeToMerge"].map(
- (key) =>
- data[user]?.total?.sizes?.[size]?.[type]?.[
- key as "timeToReview" | "timeToApprove" | "timeToMerge"
- ] || 0
- )
- )
- ),
- 1
- ) / 60
- ),
+ max: getMaxTimeValue(data, user, type),
title: "hours",
},Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| lines: [ | ||
| { | ||
| color: "gold", | ||
| name: "Time\\ To\\ Review", | ||
| values: sizes.map( | ||
| (size) => | ||
| Math.round( | ||
| ((data[user]?.total?.sizes?.[size]?.[type]?.timeToReview || 0) / | ||
| 60) * | ||
| 100 | ||
| ) / 100 | ||
| ), | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| color: "chartreuse", | ||
| name: "Time\\ To\\ Approve", | ||
| values: sizes.map( | ||
| (size) => | ||
| Math.round( | ||
| ((data[user]?.total?.sizes?.[size]?.[type]?.timeToApprove || 0) / | ||
| 60) * | ||
| 100 | ||
| ) / 100 | ||
| ), | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| color: "blueviolet", | ||
| name: "Time\\ To\\ Merge", | ||
| values: sizes.map( | ||
| (size) => | ||
| Math.round( | ||
| ((data[user]?.total?.sizes?.[size]?.[type]?.timeToMerge || 0) / | ||
| 60) * | ||
| 100 | ||
| ) / 100 | ||
| ), | ||
| }, | ||
| ], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Reduce code duplication and improve maintainability.
The lines configuration has several issues:
- Duplicate time conversion logic
- Hardcoded colors
- Potentially unnecessary space escaping in names
+const CHART_COLORS = {
+ review: "gold",
+ approve: "chartreuse",
+ merge: "blueviolet"
+} as const;
+
+interface TimeMetric {
+ key: "timeToReview" | "timeToApprove" | "timeToMerge";
+ name: string;
+ color: string;
+}
+
+const TIME_METRICS: TimeMetric[] = [
+ { key: "timeToReview", name: "Time To Review", color: CHART_COLORS.review },
+ { key: "timeToApprove", name: "Time To Approve", color: CHART_COLORS.approve },
+ { key: "timeToMerge", name: "Time To Merge", color: CHART_COLORS.merge }
+];
+
+const calculateTimeValues = (
+ data: ChartData,
+ user: string,
+ type: StatsType,
+ metricKey: TimeMetric["key"]
+): number[] => {
+ return sizes.map(
+ (size) =>
+ Math.round(
+ convertSecondsToHours(
+ data[user]?.total?.sizes?.[size]?.[type]?.[metricKey] || 0
+ ) * 100
+ ) / 100
+ );
+};
lines: [
- {
- color: "gold",
- name: "Time\\ To\\ Review",
- values: sizes.map(
- (size) =>
- Math.round(
- ((data[user]?.total?.sizes?.[size]?.[type]?.timeToReview || 0) /
- 60) *
- 100
- ) / 100
- ),
- },
- // ... similar blocks for approve and merge
+ ...TIME_METRICS.map(({ key, name, color }) => ({
+ color,
+ name: name.replace(/ /g, "\\ "),
+ values: calculateTimeValues(data, user, type, key)
+ }))
],📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| lines: [ | |
| { | |
| color: "gold", | |
| name: "Time\\ To\\ Review", | |
| values: sizes.map( | |
| (size) => | |
| Math.round( | |
| ((data[user]?.total?.sizes?.[size]?.[type]?.timeToReview || 0) / | |
| 60) * | |
| 100 | |
| ) / 100 | |
| ), | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| color: "chartreuse", | |
| name: "Time\\ To\\ Approve", | |
| values: sizes.map( | |
| (size) => | |
| Math.round( | |
| ((data[user]?.total?.sizes?.[size]?.[type]?.timeToApprove || 0) / | |
| 60) * | |
| 100 | |
| ) / 100 | |
| ), | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| color: "blueviolet", | |
| name: "Time\\ To\\ Merge", | |
| values: sizes.map( | |
| (size) => | |
| Math.round( | |
| ((data[user]?.total?.sizes?.[size]?.[type]?.timeToMerge || 0) / | |
| 60) * | |
| 100 | |
| ) / 100 | |
| ), | |
| }, | |
| ], | |
| const CHART_COLORS = { | |
| review: "gold", | |
| approve: "chartreuse", | |
| merge: "blueviolet" | |
| } as const; | |
| interface TimeMetric { | |
| key: "timeToReview" | "timeToApprove" | "timeToMerge"; | |
| name: string; | |
| color: string; | |
| } | |
| const TIME_METRICS: TimeMetric[] = [ | |
| { key: "timeToReview", name: "Time To Review", color: CHART_COLORS.review }, | |
| { key: "timeToApprove", name: "Time To Approve", color: CHART_COLORS.approve }, | |
| { key: "timeToMerge", name: "Time To Merge", color: CHART_COLORS.merge } | |
| ]; | |
| const calculateTimeValues = ( | |
| data: ChartData, | |
| user: string, | |
| type: StatsType, | |
| metricKey: TimeMetric["key"] | |
| ): number[] => { | |
| return sizes.map( | |
| (size) => | |
| Math.round( | |
| convertSecondsToHours( | |
| data[user]?.total?.sizes?.[size]?.[type]?.[metricKey] || 0 | |
| ) * 100 | |
| ) / 100 | |
| ); | |
| }; | |
| lines: [ | |
| ...TIME_METRICS.map(({ key, name, color }) => ({ | |
| color, | |
| name: name.replace(/ /g, "\\ "), | |
| values: calculateTimeValues(data, user, type, key) | |
| })) | |
| ], |
| sizes?: Record< | ||
| string, | ||
| { | ||
| timeToApprove: number[]; | ||
| timeToReview: number[]; | ||
| timeToMerge: number[]; | ||
| percentile: { | ||
| timeToApprove?: number; | ||
| timeToReview?: number; | ||
| timeToMerge?: number; | ||
| }; | ||
| average: { | ||
| timeToApprove?: number; | ||
| timeToReview?: number; | ||
| timeToMerge?: number; | ||
| }; | ||
| median: { | ||
| timeToApprove?: number; | ||
| timeToReview?: number; | ||
| timeToMerge?: number; | ||
| }; | ||
| } | ||
| >; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding type safety for size keys.
The Record<string, ...> type allows any string as a key. Since this property stores PR size-related data, consider restricting the keys to valid PR size values.
Here's a suggested improvement:
+type PRSizeKey = 'XS' | 'S' | 'M' | 'L' | 'XL';
export type Collection = {
// ... other properties ...
- sizes?: Record<string, SizeTimeStats>;
+ sizes?: Record<PRSizeKey, SizeTimeStats>;This change:
- Ensures type safety by restricting keys to valid PR sizes
- Provides better IDE autocompletion
- Prevents accidental use of invalid size keys
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| timeToReview: typeof timeToReview === "number" | ||
| ? [...(collection?.timeToReview || []), timeToReview] | ||
| : collection.timeToReview, | ||
| timeToApprove: typeof timeToApprove === 'number' | ||
| timeToApprove: typeof timeToApprove === "number" | ||
| ? [...(collection?.timeToApprove || []), timeToApprove] | ||
| : collection.timeToApprove, | ||
| timeToMerge: typeof timeToMerge === 'number' | ||
| timeToMerge: typeof timeToMerge === "number" | ||
| ? [...(collection?.timeToMerge || []), timeToMerge] | ||
| : collection.timeToMerge, | ||
| timeToReviewRequest: typeof timeToReviewRequest === 'number' | ||
| timeToReviewRequest: typeof timeToReviewRequest === "number" | ||
| ? [...(collection?.timeToReviewRequest || []), timeToReviewRequest] | ||
| : collection.timeToReviewRequest, | ||
| timeInDraft: typeof timeInDraft === 'number' | ||
| timeInDraft: typeof timeInDraft === "number" | ||
| ? [...(collection?.timeInDraft || []), timeInDraft] | ||
| : collection.timeInDraft, | ||
| sizes: { | ||
| ...(collection.sizes || {}), | ||
| [(0, calculations_1.getPullRequestSize)(pullRequestInfo?.additions, pullRequestInfo?.deletions)]: { | ||
| ...(collection.sizes?.[(0, calculations_1.getPullRequestSize)(pullRequestInfo?.additions, pullRequestInfo?.deletions)] || {}), | ||
| timeToApprove: timeToApprove | ||
| ? [ | ||
| ...(collection?.sizes?.[(0, calculations_1.getPullRequestSize)(pullRequestInfo?.additions, pullRequestInfo?.deletions)]?.timeToApprove || []), | ||
| timeToApprove, | ||
| ] | ||
| : collection?.sizes?.[(0, calculations_1.getPullRequestSize)(pullRequestInfo?.additions, pullRequestInfo?.deletions)]?.timeToApprove, | ||
| timeToReview: timeToReview | ||
| ? [ | ||
| ...(collection?.sizes?.[(0, calculations_1.getPullRequestSize)(pullRequestInfo?.additions, pullRequestInfo?.deletions)]?.timeToReview || []), | ||
| timeToReview, | ||
| ] | ||
| : collection?.sizes?.[(0, calculations_1.getPullRequestSize)(pullRequestInfo?.additions, pullRequestInfo?.deletions)]?.timeToReview, | ||
| timeToMerge: timeToMerge | ||
| ? [ | ||
| ...(collection?.sizes?.[(0, calculations_1.getPullRequestSize)(pullRequestInfo?.additions, pullRequestInfo?.deletions)]?.timeToMerge || []), | ||
| timeToMerge, | ||
| ] | ||
| : collection?.sizes?.[(0, calculations_1.getPullRequestSize)(pullRequestInfo?.additions, pullRequestInfo?.deletions)]?.timeToMerge, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor to reduce code duplication when updating sizes
The code that updates the sizes property for each time metric (timeToApprove, timeToReview, timeToMerge) contains repetitive patterns. This can be refactored to improve maintainability and readability by iterating over the time metrics dynamically.
Here's a refactored version:
return {
...collection,
timeToReview: typeof timeToReview === "number"
? [...(collection?.timeToReview || []), timeToReview]
: collection.timeToReview,
timeToApprove: typeof timeToApprove === "number"
? [...(collection?.timeToApprove || []), timeToApprove]
: collection.timeToApprove,
timeToMerge: typeof timeToMerge === "number"
? [...(collection?.timeToMerge || []), timeToMerge]
: collection.timeToMerge,
// Other properties...
sizes: {
...(collection.sizes || {}),
[sizeKey]: {
...(collection.sizes?.[sizeKey] || {}),
- timeToApprove: timeToApprove
- ? [
- ...(collection?.sizes?.[sizeKey]?.timeToApprove || []),
- timeToApprove,
- ]
- : collection?.sizes?.[sizeKey]?.timeToApprove,
- timeToReview: timeToReview
- ? [
- ...(collection?.sizes?.[sizeKey]?.timeToReview || []),
- timeToReview,
- ]
- : collection?.sizes?.[sizeKey]?.timeToReview,
- timeToMerge: timeToMerge
- ? [
- ...(collection?.sizes?.[sizeKey]?.timeToMerge || []),
- timeToMerge,
- ]
- : collection?.sizes?.[sizeKey]?.timeToMerge,
+ ...['timeToApprove', 'timeToReview', 'timeToMerge'].reduce((acc, key) => {
+ const value = eval(key);
+ return {
+ ...acc,
+ [key]: typeof value === "number"
+ ? [
+ ...(collection?.sizes?.[sizeKey]?.[key] || []),
+ value,
+ ]
+ : collection?.sizes?.[sizeKey]?.[key],
+ };
+ }, {}),
},
},
// Remaining properties...
};Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| sizes: Object.entries(collection?.sizes || {}).reduce((acc, el) => ({ | ||
| ...acc, | ||
| [el[0]]: { | ||
| ...acc[el[0]], | ||
| percentile: { | ||
| timeToReview: (0, calculations_1.calcPercentileValue)(acc[el[0]]?.timeToReview), | ||
| timeToApprove: (0, calculations_1.calcPercentileValue)(acc[el[0]]?.timeToApprove), | ||
| timeToMerge: (0, calculations_1.calcPercentileValue)(acc[el[0]]?.timeToMerge), | ||
| }, | ||
| median: { | ||
| timeToReview: (0, calculations_1.calcMedianValue)(acc[el[0]]?.timeToReview), | ||
| timeToApprove: (0, calculations_1.calcMedianValue)(acc[el[0]]?.timeToApprove), | ||
| timeToMerge: (0, calculations_1.calcMedianValue)(acc[el[0]]?.timeToMerge), | ||
| }, | ||
| average: { | ||
| timeToReview: (0, calculations_1.calcAverageValue)(acc[el[0]]?.timeToReview), | ||
| timeToApprove: (0, calculations_1.calcAverageValue)(acc[el[0]]?.timeToApprove), | ||
| timeToMerge: (0, calculations_1.calcAverageValue)(acc[el[0]]?.timeToMerge), | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| }), collection?.sizes || {}), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential logical error in accumulator usage within the reducer
In the sizes reducer function, you are using acc[el[0]] to access the time metrics for calculations. However, acc represents the accumulating object being built, and at each iteration, acc[el[0]] may not have the expected data since it's being constructed. Instead, you should use el[1], which contains the actual data for the current size category from collection.sizes.
Here's a suggested fix:
sizes: Object.entries(collection?.sizes || {}).reduce((acc, el) => ({
...acc,
[el[0]]: {
...acc[el[0]],
percentile: {
- timeToReview: (0, calculations_1.calcPercentileValue)(acc[el[0]]?.timeToReview),
- timeToApprove: (0, calculations_1.calcPercentileValue)(acc[el[0]]?.timeToApprove),
- timeToMerge: (0, calculations_1.calcPercentileValue)(acc[el[0]]?.timeToMerge),
+ timeToReview: (0, calculations_1.calcPercentileValue)(el[1]?.timeToReview),
+ timeToApprove: (0, calculations_1.calcPercentileValue)(el[1]?.timeToApprove),
+ timeToMerge: (0, calculations_1.calcPercentileValue)(el[1]?.timeToMerge),
},
median: {
- timeToReview: (0, calculations_1.calcMedianValue)(acc[el[0]]?.timeToReview),
- timeToApprove: (0, calculations_1.calcMedianValue)(acc[el[0]]?.timeToApprove),
- timeToMerge: (0, calculations_1.calcMedianValue)(acc[el[0]]?.timeToMerge),
+ timeToReview: (0, calculations_1.calcMedianValue)(el[1]?.timeToReview),
+ timeToApprove: (0, calculations_1.calcMedianValue)(el[1]?.timeToApprove),
+ timeToMerge: (0, calculations_1.calcMedianValue)(el[1]?.timeToMerge),
},
average: {
- timeToReview: (0, calculations_1.calcAverageValue)(acc[el[0]]?.timeToReview),
- timeToApprove: (0, calculations_1.calcAverageValue)(acc[el[0]]?.timeToApprove),
- timeToMerge: (0, calculations_1.calcAverageValue)(acc[el[0]]?.timeToMerge),
+ timeToReview: (0, calculations_1.calcAverageValue)(el[1]?.timeToReview),
+ timeToApprove: (0, calculations_1.calcAverageValue)(el[1]?.timeToApprove),
+ timeToMerge: (0, calculations_1.calcAverageValue)(el[1]?.timeToMerge),
},
},
}), collection?.sizes || {}),Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| [getPullRequestSize( | ||
| pullRequestInfo?.additions, | ||
| pullRequestInfo?.deletions | ||
| )]: { | ||
| ...(collection.sizes?.[ | ||
| getPullRequestSize( | ||
| pullRequestInfo?.additions, | ||
| pullRequestInfo?.deletions | ||
| ) | ||
| ] || {}), | ||
| timeToApprove: timeToApprove | ||
| ? [ | ||
| ...(collection?.sizes?.[ | ||
| getPullRequestSize( | ||
| pullRequestInfo?.additions, | ||
| pullRequestInfo?.deletions | ||
| ) | ||
| ]?.timeToApprove || []), | ||
| timeToApprove, | ||
| ] | ||
| : collection?.sizes?.[ | ||
| getPullRequestSize( | ||
| pullRequestInfo?.additions, | ||
| pullRequestInfo?.deletions | ||
| ) | ||
| ]?.timeToApprove, | ||
| timeToReview: timeToReview | ||
| ? [ | ||
| ...(collection?.sizes?.[ | ||
| getPullRequestSize( | ||
| pullRequestInfo?.additions, | ||
| pullRequestInfo?.deletions | ||
| ) | ||
| ]?.timeToReview || []), | ||
| timeToReview, | ||
| ] | ||
| : collection?.sizes?.[ | ||
| getPullRequestSize( | ||
| pullRequestInfo?.additions, | ||
| pullRequestInfo?.deletions | ||
| ) | ||
| ]?.timeToReview, | ||
| timeToMerge: timeToMerge | ||
| ? [ | ||
| ...(collection?.sizes?.[ | ||
| getPullRequestSize( | ||
| pullRequestInfo?.additions, | ||
| pullRequestInfo?.deletions | ||
| ) | ||
| ]?.timeToMerge || []), | ||
| timeToMerge, | ||
| ] | ||
| : collection?.sizes?.[ | ||
| getPullRequestSize( | ||
| pullRequestInfo?.additions, | ||
| pullRequestInfo?.deletions | ||
| ) | ||
| ]?.timeToMerge, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Cache getPullRequestSize result to avoid redundant function calls
The getPullRequestSize function is called multiple times with the same arguments within this block. Caching its result in a variable will improve performance and enhance readability by eliminating redundant calls.
Apply this diff to cache the pull request size:
+ const prSize = getPullRequestSize(
+ pullRequestInfo?.additions,
+ pullRequestInfo?.deletions
+ );
sizes: {
...(collection.sizes || {}),
- [getPullRequestSize(
- pullRequestInfo?.additions,
- pullRequestInfo?.deletions
- )]: {
+ [prSize]: {
...(collection.sizes?.[
- getPullRequestSize(
- pullRequestInfo?.additions,
- pullRequestInfo?.deletions
- )
+ prSize
] || {}),
timeToApprove: timeToApprove
? [
...(collection?.sizes?.[
- getPullRequestSize(
- pullRequestInfo?.additions,
- pullRequestInfo?.deletions
- )
+ prSize
]?.timeToApprove || []),
timeToApprove,
]
: collection?.sizes?.[
- getPullRequestSize(
- pullRequestInfo?.additions,
- pullRequestInfo?.deletions
- )
+ prSize
]?.timeToApprove,
timeToReview: timeToReview
? [
...(collection?.sizes?.[
- getPullRequestSize(
- pullRequestInfo?.additions,
- pullRequestInfo?.deletions
- )
+ prSize
]?.timeToReview || []),
timeToReview,
]
: collection?.sizes?.[
- getPullRequestSize(
- pullRequestInfo?.additions,
- pullRequestInfo?.deletions
- )
+ prSize
]?.timeToReview,
timeToMerge: timeToMerge
? [
...(collection?.sizes?.[
- getPullRequestSize(
- pullRequestInfo?.additions,
- pullRequestInfo?.deletions
- )
+ prSize
]?.timeToMerge || []),
timeToMerge,
]
: collection?.sizes?.[
- getPullRequestSize(
- pullRequestInfo?.additions,
- pullRequestInfo?.deletions
- )
+ prSize
]?.timeToMerge,
},
},Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
package.json (1)
Based on the gathered evidence, I can now provide the final response:
Critical: Missing tests for PR size analytics confirmed
The verification reveals that there are no tests for the PR size analytics feature. Specifically:
- No tests exist for
getPullRequestSize.tswhich handles size classification logic- No tests for
createSizeDependencyXYChart.tswhich manages visualization- Other calculation utilities like
calcDifferenceInMinutesandcalcNonWorkingHourshave tests, showing an established testing pattern that should be followedRequired test coverage:
getPullRequestSize.ts: Test size classifications (xs, s, m, l, xl) based on additions and deletionscreateSizeDependencyXYChart.ts: Test chart data preparation and edge casespreparePullRequestStats.ts: Test size-related statistics aggregation🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-47: Critical: Tests are missing for the new feature.While the project has Jest testing infrastructure set up, the PR objectives indicate that tests haven't been added for the new PR size analytics feature. This is concerning because:
- The feature involves data processing and visualization logic that should be verified
- Missing tests could lead to undetected bugs in size calculations or chart generation
- Future maintenance and refactoring will be riskier without test coverage
Please add tests for:
- Size metric calculations
- Chart data preparation
- Edge cases in PR size analysis
Let's verify the current test coverage for related functionality:
Let me gather more specific information about the test coverage.
Let me verify if there are any tests in the test directory that might cover these functionalities, even if not named exactly the same.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for existing tests related to PR analytics and identify gaps # Look for test files related to PR size or charts echo "Searching for relevant test files..." fd -e test.ts -e spec.ts | grep -i "size\|chart\|stats" # Check for size-related test cases in all test files echo -e "\nSearching for size-related test cases..." rg -l "describe|it|test" -t ts | xargs rg -l "size|chart" --type tsLength of output: 817
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for test files specifically for the files that handle size calculations and charts echo "Checking for corresponding test files..." for file in src/converters/utils/calculations/getPullRequestSize.ts \ src/converters/utils/preparePullRequestStats.ts \ src/view/utils/createSizeDependencyXYChart.ts; do base_name=$(basename "$file" .ts) echo "Looking for tests for $base_name:" fd "${base_name}.test.ts|${base_name}.spec.ts" done echo -e "\nChecking content of size-related implementation files:" for file in src/converters/utils/calculations/getPullRequestSize.ts \ src/view/utils/createSizeDependencyXYChart.ts; do echo -e "\nContent of $file:" cat "$file" doneLength of output: 4622
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any test files that might test size or chart functionality echo "Searching in test files for size-related tests..." fd -e test.ts -e spec.ts | xargs rg -l "getPullRequestSize|createSizeDependencyXYChart" echo -e "\nSearching for size calculations in test files..." fd -e test.ts -e spec.ts | xargs rg "test\(.*size.*\)|it\(.*size.*\)|describe\(.*size.*\)" -l echo -e "\nChecking test directory structure..." fd . src/__tests__ -t d echo -e "\nListing all test files..." fd -e test.ts -e spec.tsLength of output: 949
src/view/utils/createTimelineMonthComparisonChart.ts (1)
28-36: Consider splitting chart generation into separate functions.The function is handling multiple responsibilities: filtering dates, validating data, and generating different types of charts. This makes it harder to maintain and test.
Consider:
- Creating a separate function for data validation
- Moving chart-specific logic into dedicated functions
- Adding error handling for chart generation failures
Example structure:
const validateTimelineData = (data: Collection, type: StatsType): boolean => { // Validation logic }; const generateUserCharts = ( data: Record<string, Collection>, type: StatsType, dates: string[], user: string ): string => { try { if (!validateTimelineData(data[user], type)) { return ''; } const filteredDates = dates.filter(date => date !== "total"); return `${createTimelineMonthsXYChart(data, type, filteredDates, user)} ${createSizeDependencyXYChart(data, type, user)}`; } catch (error) { console.error(`Failed to generate charts for user ${user}:`, error); return ''; } };src/view/utils/createSizeDependencyXYChart.ts (2)
1-5: Consider making PR size categories configurable.The
sizesarray is hardcoded, which might limit flexibility. Consider making it configurable through environment variables or configuration files to allow customization of size categories.-const sizes = ["xs", "s", "m", "l", "xl"]; +import { PR_SIZE_CATEGORIES } from "../../config"; +const sizes = PR_SIZE_CATEGORIES;
13-15: Simplify chart title construction.The title construction logic is complex and hard to read. Consider extracting it to a separate function.
+const getChartTitle = (type: StatsType, user: string): string => { + const percentileText = type === "percentile" + ? `${parseInt(getValueAsIs("PERCENTILE"))}th ` + : ""; + return `Pull request's size dependency timeline(${percentileText}${type}) ${user}`; +}; return createXYChart({ - title: `Pull request's size dependency timeline(${ - type === "percentile" ? parseInt(getValueAsIs("PERCENTILE")) : "" - }${type === "percentile" ? "th " : ""}${type}) ${user}`, + title: getChartTitle(type, user),src/converters/types.ts (1)
81-103: Consider extracting nested types for better maintainability.The nested structure for time metrics and statistics is repeated multiple times. Consider extracting these into reusable types:
+type TimeMetrics = { + timeToApprove?: number; + timeToReview?: number; + timeToMerge?: number; +}; +type SizeStats = { + timeToApprove: number[]; + timeToReview: number[]; + timeToMerge: number[]; + percentile: TimeMetrics; + average: TimeMetrics; + median: TimeMetrics; +}; export type Collection = { // ... other properties ... - sizes?: Record<string, { - timeToApprove: number[]; - timeToReview: number[]; - timeToMerge: number[]; - percentile: { - timeToApprove?: number; - timeToReview?: number; - timeToMerge?: number; - }; - average: { - timeToApprove?: number; - timeToReview?: number; - timeToMerge?: number; - }; - median: { - timeToApprove?: number; - timeToReview?: number; - timeToMerge?: number; - }; - }>; + sizes?: Record<string, SizeStats>;This refactoring:
- Improves code maintainability
- Reduces duplication
- Makes the type structure more readable
- Makes it easier to modify the metrics structure in the future
src/converters/utils/preparePullRequestTimeline.ts (1)
116-177: Consider improving type safety and reducing code duplication.While the logic is correct, there are two potential improvements:
- Add explicit TypeScript interfaces for the sizes structure to improve type safety and documentation.
- Extract the repeated pattern for timeToApprove, timeToReview, and timeToMerge into a helper function.
Here's a suggested approach:
// Add type definitions interface TimeMetrics { timeToApprove?: number[]; timeToReview?: number[]; timeToMerge?: number[]; } interface SizeMetrics { [size: string]: TimeMetrics; } // Add helper function const updateTimeMetric = ( collection: Collection, size: string, metricName: keyof TimeMetrics, newValue?: number ): TimeMetrics[keyof TimeMetrics] => { if (!newValue) { return collection?.sizes?.[size]?.[metricName]; } return [ ...(collection?.sizes?.[size]?.[metricName] || []), newValue, ]; };Then simplify the sizes object:
sizes: { ...(collection.sizes || {}), [prSize]: { ...(collection.sizes?.[prSize] || {}), timeToApprove: updateTimeMetric(collection, prSize, 'timeToApprove', timeToApprove), timeToReview: updateTimeMetric(collection, prSize, 'timeToReview', timeToReview), timeToMerge: updateTimeMetric(collection, prSize, 'timeToMerge', timeToMerge), }, },build/index.js (1)
3460-3508: Refactor to reduce code duplication increateSizeDependencyXYChartfunctionThe
linesarray in thecreateSizeDependencyXYChartfunction contains repetitive code for each time metric. Refactoring this to iterate over the time metrics can improve maintainability and reduce redundancy.Here’s a suggested refactor:
const sizes = ["xs", "s", "m", "l", "xl"]; const createSizeDependencyXYChart = (data, type, user) => { return (0, createXYChart_1.createXYChart)({ title: `Pull request's size dependency timeline(${type === "percentile" ? parseInt((0, utils_1.getValueAsIs)("PERCENTILE")) : ""}${type === "percentile" ? "th " : ""}${type}) ${user}`, xAxis: sizes, yAxis: { min: 0, max: Math.ceil(Math.max(...sizes.map((size) => Math.max(...["timeToReview", "timeToApprove", "timeToMerge"].map((key) => data[user]?.total?.sizes?.[size]?.[type]?.[key] || 0))), 1) / 60), title: "hours", }, - lines: [ - { - color: "gold", - name: "Time\\ To\\ Review", - values: sizes.map((size) => Math.round(((data[user]?.total?.sizes?.[size]?.[type]?.timeToReview || 0) / - 60) * - 100) / 100), - }, - { - color: "chartreuse", - name: "Time\\ To\\ Approve", - values: sizes.map((size) => Math.round(((data[user]?.total?.sizes?.[size]?.[type]?.timeToApprove || 0) / - 60) * - 100) / 100), - }, - { - color: "blueviolet", - name: "Time\\ To\\ Merge", - values: sizes.map((size) => Math.round(((data[user]?.total?.sizes?.[size]?.[type]?.timeToMerge || 0) / - 60) * - 100) / 100), - }, - ], + lines: ["timeToReview", "timeToApprove", "timeToMerge"].map((metric, index) => ({ + color: ["gold", "chartreuse", "blueviolet"][index], + name: ["Time\\ To\\ Review", "Time\\ To\\ Approve", "Time\\ To\\ Merge"][index], + values: sizes.map((size) => + Math.round( + ((data[user]?.total?.sizes?.[size]?.[type]?.[metric] || 0) / 60) * 100 + ) / 100 + ), + })), }); };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
build/index.js(5 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)src/converters/types.ts(1 hunks)src/converters/utils/preparePullRequestStats.ts(1 hunks)src/converters/utils/preparePullRequestTimeline.ts(2 hunks)src/view/utils/createSizeDependencyXYChart.ts(1 hunks)src/view/utils/createTimelineMonthComparisonChart.ts(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (5)
src/converters/types.ts (1)
Pattern **/*.ts: Check algorithms and propose the best options
src/converters/utils/preparePullRequestStats.ts (1)
Pattern **/*.ts: Check algorithms and propose the best options
src/converters/utils/preparePullRequestTimeline.ts (1)
Pattern **/*.ts: Check algorithms and propose the best options
src/view/utils/createSizeDependencyXYChart.ts (1)
Pattern **/*.ts: Check algorithms and propose the best options
src/view/utils/createTimelineMonthComparisonChart.ts (1)
Pattern **/*.ts: Check algorithms and propose the best options
🪛 Biome
src/converters/utils/preparePullRequestStats.ts
[error] 39-39: Avoid the use of spread (...) syntax on accumulators.
Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in .reduce) because it causes a time complexity of O(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.
(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
package.json (1)
3-3: LGTM: Version bump follows semantic versioning.
The minor version increment (4.1.0 → 4.2.0) is appropriate for adding new functionality (PR size analytics feature) while maintaining backward compatibility.
src/view/utils/createTimelineMonthComparisonChart.ts (1)
5-5: LGTM!
The import statement follows the established pattern and is correctly placed with other chart-related imports.
src/converters/utils/preparePullRequestTimeline.ts (2)
4-8: LGTM! Clean import organization.
The imports are well-structured and properly grouped.
96-115: LGTM! Well-structured time metrics handling.
The time metrics are handled consistently with proper null checks and optional chaining.
build/index.js (2)
1686-1706: Potential logical error in accumulator usage within the reducer
1784-1822: Refactor to reduce code duplication when updating sizes
| [ | ||
| createTimelineMonthsXYChart( | ||
| data, | ||
| type as StatsType, | ||
| dates.filter((date) => date !== "total"), | ||
| user | ||
| ), | ||
| createSizeDependencyXYChart(data, type as StatsType, user), | ||
| ].join("\n") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve performance and readability of chart generation.
The current implementation using array creation and joins for string concatenation can be improved.
Consider this more efficient and readable approach:
- [
- createTimelineMonthsXYChart(
- data,
- type as StatsType,
- dates.filter((date) => date !== "total"),
- user
- ),
- createSizeDependencyXYChart(data, type as StatsType, user),
- ].join("\n")
+ `${createTimelineMonthsXYChart(
+ data,
+ type as StatsType,
+ dates.filter((date) => date !== "total"),
+ user
+ )}
+${createSizeDependencyXYChart(data, type as StatsType, user)}`📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| [ | |
| createTimelineMonthsXYChart( | |
| data, | |
| type as StatsType, | |
| dates.filter((date) => date !== "total"), | |
| user | |
| ), | |
| createSizeDependencyXYChart(data, type as StatsType, user), | |
| ].join("\n") | |
| `${createTimelineMonthsXYChart( | |
| data, | |
| type as StatsType, | |
| dates.filter((date) => date !== "total"), | |
| user | |
| )} | |
| ${createSizeDependencyXYChart(data, type as StatsType, user)}` |
| }); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for chart creation.
The chart creation could fail if the data is malformed. Consider wrapping it in a try-catch block.
- });
+ }).catch(error => {
+ console.error('Failed to create size dependency chart:', error);
+ throw new Error(`Chart creation failed: ${error.message}`);
+ });📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| }); | |
| }; | |
| }).catch(error => { | |
| console.error('Failed to create size dependency chart:', error); | |
| throw new Error(`Chart creation failed: ${error.message}`); | |
| }); | |
| }; |
| export const createSizeDependencyXYChart = ( | ||
| data: Record<string, Record<string, Collection>>, | ||
| type: StatsType, | ||
| user: string | ||
| ) => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add input parameter validation.
The function should validate its input parameters to handle edge cases gracefully.
export const createSizeDependencyXYChart = (
data: Record<string, Record<string, Collection>>,
type: StatsType,
user: string
-) => {
+): ReturnType<typeof createXYChart> => {
+ if (!data || !user) {
+ throw new Error("Data and user parameters are required");
+ }
+ if (!data[user]?.total?.sizes) {
+ throw new Error(`No size data available for user: ${user}`);
+ }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export const createSizeDependencyXYChart = ( | |
| data: Record<string, Record<string, Collection>>, | |
| type: StatsType, | |
| user: string | |
| ) => { | |
| export const createSizeDependencyXYChart = ( | |
| data: Record<string, Record<string, Collection>>, | |
| type: StatsType, | |
| user: string | |
| ): ReturnType<typeof createXYChart> => { | |
| if (!data || !user) { | |
| throw new Error("Data and user parameters are required"); | |
| } | |
| if (!data[user]?.total?.sizes) { | |
| throw new Error(`No size data available for user: ${user}`); | |
| } |
Pull Request
Description
Added XY graph to show Time/PR size dependency
Type of Change
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores