-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ability to disable private PTRs completely #3184
Comments
|
Merge in DNS/adguard-home from 3184-disable-ptr to master Updates #3184. Squashed commit of the following: commit b78ac2e Author: Eugene Burkov <e.burkov@adguard.com> Date: Wed May 26 17:20:34 2021 +0300 all: rename dns config field commit 3651213 Author: Ildar Kamalov <ik@adguard.com> Date: Wed May 26 15:55:44 2021 +0300 client: handle local ips rdns commit 9a69183 Author: Eugene Burkov <e.burkov@adguard.com> Date: Wed May 26 14:43:13 2021 +0300 all: imp naming commit 771b7a3 Author: Eugene Burkov <e.burkov@adguard.com> Date: Wed May 26 14:24:38 2021 +0300 all: imp docs, code commit be96089 Author: Eugene Burkov <e.burkov@adguard.com> Date: Wed May 26 13:23:56 2021 +0300 all: imp docs & log changes commit 4e645a5 Author: Eugene Burkov <e.burkov@adguard.com> Date: Wed May 26 12:49:44 2021 +0300 all: add the field into structs commit 22b5b61 Author: Eugene Burkov <e.burkov@adguard.com> Date: Tue May 25 15:10:31 2021 +0300 dnsforward: entitle lock, imp code
@DandelionSprout, thanks, but that wouldn't be an optimal solution for several reasons:
Eugene has already pushed the feature to the main branch, and it should arrive in one of the next |
I currently have the following rules to handle PTR queries:
Link-local and private addresses return |
Merge in DNS/adguard-home from 3184-disable-ptr to master Updates AdguardTeam#3184. Squashed commit of the following: commit b78ac2e Author: Eugene Burkov <e.burkov@adguard.com> Date: Wed May 26 17:20:34 2021 +0300 all: rename dns config field commit 3651213 Author: Ildar Kamalov <ik@adguard.com> Date: Wed May 26 15:55:44 2021 +0300 client: handle local ips rdns commit 9a69183 Author: Eugene Burkov <e.burkov@adguard.com> Date: Wed May 26 14:43:13 2021 +0300 all: imp naming commit 771b7a3 Author: Eugene Burkov <e.burkov@adguard.com> Date: Wed May 26 14:24:38 2021 +0300 all: imp docs, code commit be96089 Author: Eugene Burkov <e.burkov@adguard.com> Date: Wed May 26 13:23:56 2021 +0300 all: imp docs & log changes commit 4e645a5 Author: Eugene Burkov <e.burkov@adguard.com> Date: Wed May 26 12:49:44 2021 +0300 all: add the field into structs commit 22b5b61 Author: Eugene Burkov <e.burkov@adguard.com> Date: Tue May 25 15:10:31 2021 +0300 dnsforward: entitle lock, imp code
A lot of people seem to be under the impression that the “Enable reverse resolving of clients' IP addresses” checkmark is supposed to disable private PTR requests, which it doesn't. It's probably because of the UI design flaw: since it's close to the Private DNS servers input, people think that it's related. We should:
NXDOMAIN
.This should be solved early in the v0.107 cycle, so that we have it in early betas. There seems to be decent demand for this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: