perf: Cancel automatic closure of debugging dialog

[wangdan-fit2cloud]

What this PR does / why we need it?

Summary of your change

Please indicate you've done the following:

• Made sure tests are passing and test coverage is added if needed.
• Made sure commit message follow the rule of Conventional Commits specification.
• Considered the docs impact and opened a new docs issue or PR with docs changes if needed.

[f2c-ci-robot]

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[f2c-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[shaohuzhang1]

Code Review

The provided code appears to be part of an application that manages workflow settings, includes buttons and collapsible elements for adding components, debugging nodes, and setting visibility or publication status. Here's a review highlighting any irregularities, potential issues, or optimization suggestions:

Irregularities/Potential Issues

1. Redundant Click Outside Handler: The clickoutsideDebug method is declared but never used. It's likely intended to handle clicks outside the debug container to close it, but the function body has been commented out.

2. String Manipulation Logic: The logic within error message handling can be simplified and made more readable. For example:

   // Simplified and improved version:
   function showErrorMessage(errorResponse) {
     const stepName = errorResponse.node.properties?.stepName;
     if (errorResponse instanceof Error) { // Assume responseType is actually an object with properties
       MsgError(`${stepName} "${errorResponse.message}"`);
     } else if (errorResponse.errMessage) {
       MsgError(`${stepName} "${typeof errorResponse.errMessage === 'string' ? errorResponse.errMessage : [...Object.values(errorResponse.errMessage)][0].message}"`);
     }
   }

3. Unused Function: Commented-out functions (clickoutsideDebug) are not necessary in this context.

4. Class Naming Consistency: While consistent classes like .workflow-debug-container, .custom-header, etc., were applied consistently across instances, consider using class variables for dynamic styling to improve maintainability.

5. Dynamic Class Application: Ensure dynamic styling classes remain up-to-date based on conditions such as isDefaultTheme.

Optimization Suggestions

• Code Smell Removal: Remove redundant lines of code where comments explain obvious operations like MsgError, which should be directly implemented in methods without explicit commentary.

• Avoid Multiple Calls to t() Function: If $t() translates text multiple times inside template literals, use helper functions to cache results or refactor them into reusable strings.

These adjustments should lead to cleaner, more efficient code, improving readability and potentially performance.

[shaohuzhang1]

The code appears to be well-formatted and clear with no major discrepancies or inconsistencies. There is one suggestion for improving readability:

In line 6, "对话ID" could potentially be clearer in context if it were changed to "会话 ID". This ensures that the phrase accurately reflects its meaning as a reference to an identifier for a conversation.

Overall, the code looks good, but this minor suggestion can help clarify the text better.

[shaohuzhang1]

The code looks mostly correct. However, there's a small grammatical issue in the translation of "chatID":

Original:

chatId: '對話ID',

Suggested correction (more natural English):

chatId: '對話 号碼',

OR

comment out if not needed
// chatId: '對話 ID',
// chatId: 'conversation ID', // also good option

This change makes the text more standard and clear, especially for non-native speakers. If you don't require users to see 对話ID as is, feel free to comment it out or replace with an appropriate term like '对话号码'.