You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have created a rule consisting of two boundary nodes joined by an edge. On the LHS the edge is undirected, on the RHS it is directed.
It seems that the matcher handles this correctly, but the direction is not present in the rewritten graph. Sees that variations on this theme where both vertices are not boundary work fine.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I get different behaviour for the two graphs. In 3-edges.qgraph I don't see any directions appearing in the matches at all. In 2-edges.qgraph I do get directions appearing, but only towards boundary nodes. I suspect this is more than one bug? Part of the issue could be that the rule matches on the interior of any wire, and is then left with a wire that is directed for part of its length, but undirected on others.
I have created a rule consisting of two boundary nodes joined by an edge. On the LHS the edge is undirected, on the RHS it is directed.
It seems that the matcher handles this correctly, but the direction is not present in the rewritten graph. Sees that variations on this theme where both vertices are not boundary work fine.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: