Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: use jsonparse for ND-JSON instead of the custom made implementa… #493

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 2, 2020
Merged

feat: use jsonparse for ND-JSON instead of the custom made implementa… #493

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 2, 2020

Conversation

juanjoDiaz
Copy link
Collaborator

JSON parse support ND-JSON perfectly. No reason to use custom implementation.

Also, my custom implementation is a lot weaker and might fail with escaped newlines and things like that.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling f6bfa50 on juanjoDiaz:ndjson_with_jsonparse into 471f5a7 on zemirco:master.

@knownasilya knownasilya merged commit 55aa0c7 into zemirco:master Nov 2, 2020
@juanjoDiaz juanjoDiaz deleted the ndjson_with_jsonparse branch November 2, 2020 07:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants