Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[DocDB] PITR in conjunction with xCluster Replication #10820

Closed
sanketkedia opened this issue Dec 9, 2021 · 0 comments
Closed

[DocDB] PITR in conjunction with xCluster Replication #10820

sanketkedia opened this issue Dec 9, 2021 · 0 comments
Assignees
@sanketkedia
Labels
area/docdb YugabyteDB core features kind/enhancement This is an enhancement of an existing feature priority/medium Medium priority issue

Comments

@sanketkedia
Copy link
Contributor

sanketkedia commented Dec 9, 2021 •
edited by yugabyte-ci
Loading

Jira Link: DB-787

Description

We need to investigate PITR support for databases/tables on which xCluster replication is set up. Ideally, if we let replication lag to be 0 and stop all reads/writes then we should be able to perform data-only restores. However, restoring metadata i.e. restoring DDLs wouldn't be possible.
@sanketkedia sanketkedia added the area/docdb YugabyteDB core features label Dec 9, 2021
@sanketkedia sanketkedia self-assigned this Dec 9, 2021
@bmatican bmatican mentioned this issue Dec 9, 2021
Closed
@yugabyte-ci yugabyte-ci added kind/bug This issue is a bug priority/medium Medium priority issue labels Jun 8, 2022
@yugabyte-ci yugabyte-ci added kind/enhancement This is an enhancement of an existing feature and removed kind/bug This issue is a bug labels Jul 30, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@sanketkedia sanketkedia

Labels
area/docdb YugabyteDB core features kind/enhancement This is an enhancement of an existing feature priority/medium Medium priority issue
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@sanketkedia @yugabyte-ci